Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 26 1234511 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 257
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    three topologies for three fusions

    Theoretically, the three fusion reactions of two deuterium atoms are given by the following:

    (1) D + D ® Heł + n + energy
    (2) D + D ® Tł + p + 4.0 MeV
    (3) D + D ® He + 28.3 MeV

    In these nuclear reactions D represents a deuterium atom. Heł and He represent helium atoms with their different atomic mass numbers indicated by the superscripts. The letter p and n, respectively, represent a proton and a neutron. The letter T represents one tritium atom as the radioisotope of hydrogen. All excess energies are given in million electronvolts (MeV). The three products: Heł, He, and Tł are associated by its distinct space-time topologies. These are composite topologies of the proton topology and neutron topology. For the purpose of simplified discussions, the proton can be represented by an H-plus topology whiles the neutron by an H-minus topology.


    By these distinct topologies, Heł is composed of two H-pluses and one H-minus. Tł is composed of one H-plus and two H-minuses. He is composed of two H-pluses and two H-minuses. The orientations of these composite topologies can be represented by triangle, square, or tetrahedron. If these topologies are replaced with ball magnets then simple experiments demonstrate that by using the packing theorem the triangular pattern is more compact than the tetrahedral pattern and the tetrahedron is more compact than the square pattern of 4 ball magnets. The three composite topologies are then given by triangle, square, and tetrahedron. Reaction 1 and 2 both are triangles, while reaction 3 can be assigned to both square and tetrahedral topology. Which of these topologies is assigned to deuteron cold fusion can be answered by performing certain critical experiments.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    We need only one thank goodness.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    Since experiments has already determined the probability of each reaction, it is now for us to change the probability of the correct reaction. I'm hoping to change the probability of the 3rd reaction.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Since experiments has already determined the probability of each reaction, it is now for us to change the probability of the correct reaction. I'm hoping to change the probability of the 3rd reaction.
    I wish you every success my friend.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    But system stability is known to be the reciprocal of greater system probability of occurrence.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But system stability is known to be the reciprocal of greater system probability of occurrence.
    Right,that makes it more viable right?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    That means stable systems (either macroscopic or microscopic) are less likely to occur than unstable dynamic systems.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    That means stable systems (either macroscopic or microscopic) are less likely to occur than unstable dynamic systems.
    It seems then that unstable dynamic systems are the ones to look at.

    regardsmichael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    The key is to achieve dynamic equilibrium.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]˛=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c˛

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: three topologies for three fusions

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    The key is to achieve dynamic equilibrium.
    That's the way forward then.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 26 1234511 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top