I'm having difficulty connecting infinity to the absolute. Infinity to me is the unknowable while absolute is the immovable or unchangeable.
I'm having difficulty connecting infinity to the absolute. Infinity to me is the unknowable while absolute is the immovable or unchangeable.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
In math, infinity is a continuous function of infinitely extended domains and and ranges along the ordinate and the abscissa.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Godel proved that there is no logic in mathematics that gave it an absolute foundation.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
If you mean the illogical of missing logic. Missing logic is logical in the intuitive sense. Can a person who always lie ever tell the truth. The truth is the person is always a liar.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
The theory of syllogistic logic is a one way street to arrive at the truth. Or it is a theory of the excluded middle. It can be 'yes' or 'no' but not 'maybe.'
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)