Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 73
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    topology in the first dimension

    Physical reality is totally and completely one-dimensional. This simple conjecture is much easier said than it is proven. The two basic ingredients of one-dimensional topology are simply line and circle. These are generalized into opened-curves and closed-curves. All opened-curves have two ends, while every one of the closed-curves simply looped back continuously on itself. The study of one-dimensional topology, at the least, comprises the various minimal transformations of opened-curve into a line or closed-curve into a circle. Hence, line and circle represent the geodesics of one-dimensional Euclidean topology.


    A ball of spaghetti and a ball of rubber bands are good examples of three-dimensional representations of open-curves and closed-curves. Sadly, there are no higher dimensional representations although by advanced mathematical abstractions there are. Fortunately, these are not important for the formulation of a quantum theory of the spacetime continuum. Furthermore, for this proposed quantum theory, opened-curves are extra baggage for the quantum travelers and they are much better left behind at the train of thought station. In the final analysis, the one and only ingredient of one-dimensional topology are special kinds of closed-curves called Hopf links. These subdivided into two distinct topologies called H-plus and H-minus. Both are represented by Hadamard matrices. Luckily, a unique algebra is constructed for the multiplicative, additive, and subtractive operations of these matrices in order to justify the quantitative science of mass and charge variability of physical reality and giving answers to the fundamental question why electric charge is a relativistic invariance while physical mass is not.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    I always thought that we lived in a three dimensional reality and not one,but then you are talking about just physical reality right? And not including the mind aspect of it?


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Material beings must exist at most in 3 dimensions. Time is not a fourth dimension. Time is simply a gauging of physical decay from 3D back to lower dimensions, 2D and then 1D. Mind is truly one dimensional.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Material beings must exist at most in 3 dimensions. Time is not a fourth dimension. Time is simply a gauging of physical decay from 3D back to lower dimensions, 2D and then 1D. Mind is truly one dimensional.
    Yes that's what I thought,the mind seems to be back of all existence.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Ideas about theory of flow work better and effectively in one or two dimensions. The most constant of all flow is time and it flows in one dimension or one direction always toward the future. But in a quantum theory of the spacetime continuum, both space and time flow around a Mobius topology.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Ideas about theory of flow work better and effectively in one or two dimensions. The most constant of all flow is time and it flows in one dimension or one direction always toward the future. But in a quantum theory of the spacetime continuum, both space and time flow around a Mobius topology.
    So within the mobius topology it would be timeless then?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    As a parameter, time is simply used to track the local infinitesimal motion of a Mobius topology. Outside this topology, time does not exist independently.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    As a parameter, time is simply used to track the local infinitesimal motion of a Mobius topology. Outside this topology, time does not exist independently.
    Yes that's exactly what I thought.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    That is how we live forever by riding the waves of the Mobius topology. But the caveat is after one complete cycle our right hands become our left hands our left hearts become our right hearts. Completing the second cycle put everything back to the normal configuration.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: topology in the first dimension

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    That is how we live forever by riding the waves of the Mobius topology. But the caveat is after one complete cycle our right hands become our left hands our left hearts become our right hearts. Completing the second cycle put everything back to the normal configuration.
    That makes sense,btw,my stepfather's heart was on the right side of his body and not the left,maybe he was a reverse Mobius topology?

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 8 12345 ... LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top