Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    FYI, Godel already proved that mathematics is incomplete and the axiomatic foundation of mathematics cannot be found. If you dont know this fact then you can continue to repeat the same worthless efforts other mathematicians have done before the implication of Godel's assertion. As a scientist exploring the mysteries of the cosmos you would need the correct tools (all established mathematics not just the operator of addition) to carry out all your investigations. You also need the correct method called the scientific method. What you got is just a screw driver not even one with the correct head to fit the screw.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #22
    3rd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    410
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 164x in 144 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    The facts of my geometry representations of the formula 6n + or -1 = all primes and some non-primes is a correct fact based on scientific method.......as you have stated you do not understand anything I've stated.....

    If you want to understand and find the truth you may need to get yourself a beginners guide to mathematics and I can help walk you through the 2nd line in both of these threads....

    Addition is not that difficult to grasp and I'm sure many 10 yrs olds can understand some if not all these simple mathematics I have posted.....

    The truth is out there for those with some effort and desire to find the truth.......imho

    Here below is 2nd line of "Slippage" post once again.....it is simple and I can help you to understand when your ready to find the truth......
    6 + 10 + 15 = 31( Icosahedron spun equators{3D}

    Here below is first line of this thread and again, when you ready to understand the truth I will help you......this is not as difficult as you may think......

    2D triangle = 2D area/opening
    ..{ 3 chordal edges }...

    Rybo
    Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.

  3. #23
    3rd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    410
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 164x in 144 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    http://home.usit.net/~rybo6/rybo/id26.html

    Here is link to jpg of my recent---2012----scenario possibilites on Mass or Higgs boson if exists---being related to internal radial vectors of the three, and only three, primary structurally stable, and regular, 3D, volumetric polyhedra of Universe.

    1) tetrahedron = 10:6 ratio
    ..{ 10 radial vs 6 chords }...

    2) octahedron = 18:12 ratio
    ..{ 18 radials vs 12 chords }...

    3) icosahedron = 50:30 ratio
    ..{ 50 radials vs 30 chords }...


    Mass Internal Tetrahedron?

    This link above gives new and additional visual graphic to help better understand this 2012 mass as radials scenario.

    2D triangle = 2D area/opening
    ..{ 3 chordal edges }...

    3D tetrahedron = 3D volume/openings
    ..{ 6 chordal edges }...

    2D subdivided triangle = 1 + 3 = 4( solid? membrane )

    2D Here and Now

    ..{ 3 chordal edges and 3 radial edges }..

    3D subdivided tetrahedron = 1 + 4 =5( solid? mass )
    ..{ 6 chordal edges and 4 radial edges }..

    2D subdivided triangle( nucleated ) = 6 internal surface angles
    ..{ 540 surface degrees }..

    3D subdivided tetrahedron( nucleated ) = 12 internal surface and 12 internal volume angles

    Subdivided tet 1/4 A mod

    ..{ 720 surface degrees }
    ..{ two 360 degree circles / four 180 degree surface triangles }
    ..{ plus 6, precessed, internal volume triangles }...
    ..{ precessed = at 90 degrees to each other...see graphic for internal volume triangles }...

    Compare the above 12 + 12 angles to the below 24 chordal edges and 24 radial edges
    3D > 2D > 1D

    1D = linear number line 0, 1, 2, 3,4, 5, 6, 7 etc...
    .{ <--------0--------> }.

    2D = 4 parrallel number lines that correspond 2D, hexa or hepta-wave-
    linear set.

    Prime-wave Reflexive Revisoning
    Sine-wave Landscape

    ...0..................6..
    .....1.............5....( all primes fall on this line except 2 and 3 )
    ........2......4..........
    ...........3...............

    .{ \/\/\/\ }...

    and the 2D wave-linear number lines, translate into a 2D hexagonal as 6 number lines radiating from a common center point and this hexagonal format, all primes fall on two radial lines.

    455.11 6 GRCs
    ..{ see hexagon }...

    .{ \/
    .{ /\ }...

    3D = 12 or 24 radial lines that define four hexagons aka the cubo- octahedron or Vector Equilibrium ergo more omni-directional-like.

    455.11 6 GRCs

    ..{ \/
    >-----<
    ... /\ }......

    In construction of the VE from four individual circles or hexagons, there is a total of 24 radial edges, and 24 chordal edges ergo Vector Equilibrium.

    Compare this to the nucleated tetrahedron above with 12 internal surface angles and 12 internal volume angles

    Rybo
    Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.

  4. #24
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    By your insistence, I need you to suggest a beginner's book on mathematics that I can read. I challenge you to tell me the author of this book if it is not you yourself who wrote it. If you failed I have to stop you from continue posting nonsense.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #25
    3rd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    410
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 164x in 144 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    That you cannot understand simple mathematical additions is not my fault....as you suggest.

    Here is first line of this thread. When you are ready to understand the truth of this comment please let me know

    2D
    triangle = 2D area/opening
    ..{ 3 chordal edges }...

    The truth is out there for those with some effort and desire to find the truth......

    Were not dealing with rocket science here....simple addition....a 10 can understand this with a little help from their friends......I've ben friendly in my offers to help you understand these simple additions and you refuse my help.....

    If you will not accept my help to understand then get yourself a book or find someone else to help you understand these simple additions.....

    If you have any 15 yr friends who have had math in school they too can probably also walk you through these simple additions.....imho...Rybo
    Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.

  6. #26
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    I'll base your worthiness to post further by the following questions.

    1. Is addition commutative?
    2. Is addition associative?
    3. Is there an inverse to every element of addition?
    4. What is the element called the identity of addition?
    5. Why is it that addition is called a binary operator?

    Any wrong answer would eject you from this forum.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  7. #27
    3rd degree Black Belt
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    410
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 164x in 144 Posts
    Rep Power
    0

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    Ive offered to help you understand simple addition and you refuse my help repeatedly dude....it is obvious to me you have no desire to understand any of the many simple truths I have offered you...ergo it is a waste of my time to continue to offer you my help....

    Come back and talk to me when you have sincere desire to understand anything I've stated...

    Not likely based on your comments to date....the truth is out there and you appear to be stuck in some ego place that keeps you blind to the simple my simple truths and speculations thereupon.....

    Rybo
    Icosahedral gravity is the most spherical regular polyhedron ergo it the highest quasi-physical dimensioning(powering) serving as the intermediate buffer-zone between all that is physical all that is metaphysical.

  8. #28
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: Translating 3D > 2D > 1D

    The feeling is mutual so I request you from further senseless discussion.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top