Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    change in topology

    The more things change the more they stay the same. For example, the seasonal change of planet Earth. Everyone took it for granted that after every winter there is a spring. But before every winter there was an autumn. On the other hand, from the perspective of a summer, after every summer there is an autumn. But before every summer there was a spring. Some plant things grow in the spring, while some plant things decay in the autumn. Nevertheless, at both poles there exist perpetual winters without any plant thing, while at the equator there exists perpetual summer of abundant plant things. True change comes if the Earth decided to spin in the opposite direction or its geomagnetism begins another reversal. Any change in spin or the direction of the magnetic field is equivalent to a change in topology.


    For elementary particles, it is this change in topology that allows scientists to differentiate different kinds of elementary particles. The global property of this topology is known as the electric charge. For example, although the total mass of the electron can change depending on its state of motion, its rest mass is an apparent topological invariance. If the speed of the electron reaches lightspeed then the relativistic mass of the electron becomes infinite hence its total mass is infinite. The component of motion for an object with infinite mass is zero. That is the object is truly at rest. However, its electric charge is a true topological invariance. It is independent of the state of motion of the particle. These facts guided the design of both linear as well as circular particle accelerators at CERN and elsewhere. The discovery of positronium in 1951 by Martin Deutsch of MIT is an experimental proof that change in topology does occur for the production and destruction of elementary particles.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: change in topology

    Change is forever occuring,this world is no exception,the change happening now will bring great hardships and heartache to this age.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  3. #3
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: change in topology

    Are you referring to the Age of the Internet? I thought it has saved the forest from the trees? Preventing deforestation is one way of slowing down the speed of global warming.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #4
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: change in topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Are you referring to the Age of the Internet? I thought it has saved the forest from the trees? Preventing deforestation is one way of slowing down the speed of global warming.
    Yes that is right,with the wide use of the internet everyone is better and more quickly informed about global events.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  5. #5
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: change in topology

    Knowing might not be as good as acting quickly to reverse the bad effects.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #6
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: change in topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    Knowing might not be as good as acting quickly to reverse the bad effects.
    Yes action is needed and soon if we are to have any real positive effects on climate change.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  7. #7
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: change in topology

    My first action was to get rid of the car I used to drive and to rely on public transportation.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #8
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: change in topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    My first action was to get rid of the car I used to drive and to rely on public transportation.
    Good Idea,I have no car either and use the bus.


    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

  9. #9
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    Re: change in topology

    But one or two persons couldnt really slow down the effect of global warming?
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  10. #10
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Re: change in topology

    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
    But one or two persons couldnt really slow down the effect of global warming?

    If there impact was great enough yes,otherwise no.

    regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top