| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
10-03-2005, 09:17 PM
| The 3D building block is 
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0  | |
10-04-2005, 02:58 PM
| Guille,
I took calculus as a senior in highschool. You should definitely be able to learn calculus before entering college. If you wish, I can PM you a series of lectures explaining calculus, that is if your school won't be offering it or something. Do you mind if I ask what grade you are in?
I know what you mean about being born in the wrong time. Sometimes I swear I was born at the single worst point in human history, that I have been given a disgrace of a world which I now am obligated to fix. Nonetheless, as Antonio pointed out, we all currently exist at a most PIVOTAL point in human history, one in which revolution, change, and reformation are imminent, not just because of the TOE, but that will definitely be a BIG thing, so maybe we should take the problem as a challenge, an opportunity, and rise to the occasion! Remember, peak oil production is coming or is already here so we may be riding in carriages again sooner than you think 
ps. I am earning a degree in engineering (environmental) as a practical way to make money and promote sustainability, but increasingly I am becoming disenchanted with what is said to be "practical" and instead have become devoted, obsessed, indeed completely POSESSED by my theory which I believe is my true calling, my destiny to reveal. In other words, when forging a path, be sure to follow your heart, and your destiny will find you. SOrry if I talk about destiny too much, but it's true!
-subversion  | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
10-06-2005, 04:47 PM
| disconnectivies of local spacetime 
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
10-08-2005, 10:49 AM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by subversion Guille,
I took calculus as a senior in highschool. You should definitely be able to learn calculus before entering college. If you wish, I can PM you a series of lectures explaining calculus, that is if your school won't be offering it or something. Do you mind if I ask what grade you are in?
I know what you mean about being born in the wrong time. Sometimes I swear I was born at the single worst point in human history, that I have been given a disgrace of a world which I now am obligated to fix. Nonetheless, as Antonio pointed out, we all currently exist at a most PIVOTAL point in human history, one in which revolution, change, and reformation are imminent, not just because of the TOE, but that will definitely be a BIG thing, so maybe we should take the problem as a challenge, an opportunity, and rise to the occasion! Remember, peak oil production is coming or is already here so we may be riding in carriages again sooner than you think
ps. I am earning a degree in engineering (environmental) as a practical way to make money and promote sustainability, but increasingly I am becoming disenchanted with what is said to be "practical" and instead have become devoted, obsessed, indeed completely POSESSED by my theory which I believe is my true calling, my destiny to reveal. In other words, when forging a path, be sure to follow your heart, and your destiny will find you. SOrry if I talk about destiny too much, but it's true!
-subversion | I would apreciate it if you send me those lectures on calculus.
I'm in grade 10. Which means I have to years of school after this year, and then I'll be 18 and go to university.
I see your point on TOE creation.
I read in a newspaper that oil production will peak in February 2006 nearly for sure. So true, carraiges may come back.....But if I have to say whcih candidate I think that will win the race for travelling energy fuel, it is hydrogen for sure (or power cell, which is hydrogen and electricity).
I think there is no problem in getting obsessed by theoretical thought. It only is bad if you stop looking at your health (both mental and physical). And anyway, all practical use is derived from theoretical knowledge. | | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
10-08-2005, 10:50 AM
| | Antonio,
is a connection beteween two space-time points pure energy? or what? | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
10-08-2005, 05:25 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by GUILLE is a connection beteween two space-time points pure energy? or what? | It is the addition of two squares of energy that are of the same dimension. Squares of energy of different dimensions cannot be added together.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
10-08-2005, 06:00 PM
| The spacetime structures for up and down quarks where the space charge of H+ is 1/6 ( electric charge of up is 2/3=[H+][H+][H+][H+][H+][H-]) and the space charge of H- is -1/6 ( electric charge of down is -1/3=[H+][H-][H-][H-]). Notice that the up is a octahedron structure and the down is a tetrahedron structure. The lengths of connection are arbitrary. 
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
10-08-2005, 06:50 PM
| The structure for electron and photon are the following 
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
10-09-2005, 06:53 AM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao It is the addition of two squares of energy that are of the same dimension. Squares of energy of different dimensions cannot be added together. | Does this impply that you something cannot change of dimensionality?
How can something physical such as a connection (bridge) between two points be the "addition of twh sqaures of energy"? | | | | The Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 3,278
48 | |
10-09-2005, 06:58 AM
| | There is one unique big thing I don't understand in this model of the fundamental structure of matter spacetime and energy:
What is the H physically? Is it a force? Energy? Is the H a particle? A spacetime point? Is it the chargfe that determines all the other charges? A force of all forces?... | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:14 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
