Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    23 general math problems by Hilbert

    The website describes the 23 mathematical problems addressed by Hilbert at the turn of the century 1900.

    http://babbage.clarku.edu/~djoyce/hilbert/
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #2
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    The following site shows what problems remain unsolved
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert's_problems
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  3. #3
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    I had read some things about the Hilbert problems. Going through the list, I recognise some of them.

    There are only two completely open problems left. There is one partially solved, one non-mathematical solution, one which is described as "too vague", and one with "no consensus", and I don't know what thsi last one means?

    The problem I most like is the 6th "Axiomatize all physics" which has been solved but not mathematically. I believe it's the most atractive to have a go at, I'll try it.

    Another one I like is the first problem. What set of numbers could there be between reals and integers?

    I see mentions about a 24th problem in the links. What problem is it????
    Last edited by Guille; 10-20-2005 at 06:32 AM.

  4. #4
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    I see mentions about a 24th problem in the links. What problem is it????
    The 24th problem was a theory of proof based on the criterion of simplicity. Simplicity is the property, condition, or quality of being simple or un-combined. It often connotes beauty. Simple things are usually easier to explain and understand than complex ones. Simplicity is freedom from difficulty or hardship or effort. According to Occam's razor, all other things being equal, the simplest theory is the most likely to be true — hence the importance of the concept of simplicity in epistemology. According to Thomas Aquinas, God is infinitely simple.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  5. #5
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    The 24th problem was a theory of proof based on the criterion of simplicity. Simplicity is the property, condition, or quality of being simple or un-combined. It often connotes beauty. Simple things are usually easier to explain and understand than complex ones. Simplicity is freedom from difficulty or hardship or effort. According to Occam's razor, all other things being equal, the simplest theory is the most likely to be true — hence the importance of the concept of simplicity in epistemology. According to Thomas Aquinas, God is infinitely simple.
    And according to Guillermo Garrido, thomas aquinas himself was infinatelly stupid for the fact of believing in an-according-to-him infinatelly stupid god, and believing in the superiority of this un existing element.

    But the idea of "simpel is beautifull" is a philsophical theory, and, that impplies, there is ano opposite theory for it. And actually there is. It can be sum up as thid quote which I don't know who said first: "The streight line is the shortest distance between two points. But not at all the most interesting" and interesting can be replaced with beautifull.

 

 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 10
    Last Post: 02-03-2008, 06:44 AM
  2. WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB
    By Serge Patlavskiy in forum Theory Characteristics
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 09-11-2007, 10:18 PM
  3. important of Hilbert space
    By AntonioLao in forum Philosophy of Math
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-29-2006, 12:40 PM
  4. Unify for Quantum Mechanics & General Theory of Relativi
    By vacuum-mechanics in forum TOE Theories
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-22-2004, 09:36 PM
  5. Modification of Einstein general theory of relativity
    By vacuum-mechanics in forum General Physics
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-22-2004, 05:04 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top