Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics
Reload this Page 23 general math problems by Hilbert
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
23 general math problems by Hilbert
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
23 general math problems by Hilbert - 10-19-2005, 01:03 PM

The website describes the 23 mathematical problems addressed by Hilbert at the turn of the century 1900.

http://babbage.clarku.edu/~djoyce/hilbert/


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
10-19-2005, 03:09 PM

The following site shows what problems remain unsolved
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hilbert's_problems


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
10-19-2005, 04:26 PM

I had read some things about the Hilbert problems. Going through the list, I recognise some of them.

There are only two completely open problems left. There is one partially solved, one non-mathematical solution, one which is described as "too vague", and one with "no consensus", and I don't know what thsi last one means?

The problem I most like is the 6th "Axiomatize all physics" which has been solved but not mathematically. I believe it's the most atractive to have a go at, I'll try it.

Another one I like is the first problem. What set of numbers could there be between reals and integers?

I see mentions about a 24th problem in the links. What problem is it????

Last edited by Guille : 10-20-2005 at 06:32 AM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to allAntonioLao is a name known to all
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,613
Thanks Given: 790
Thanked 180x in 174 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 80
   
10-20-2005, 02:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
I see mentions about a 24th problem in the links. What problem is it????
The 24th problem was a theory of proof based on the criterion of simplicity. Simplicity is the property, condition, or quality of being simple or un-combined. It often connotes beauty. Simple things are usually easier to explain and understand than complex ones. Simplicity is freedom from difficulty or hardship or effort. According to Occam's razor, all other things being equal, the simplest theory is the most likely to be true — hence the importance of the concept of simplicity in epistemology. According to Thomas Aquinas, God is infinitely simple.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 48
   
10-21-2005, 05:31 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The 24th problem was a theory of proof based on the criterion of simplicity. Simplicity is the property, condition, or quality of being simple or un-combined. It often connotes beauty. Simple things are usually easier to explain and understand than complex ones. Simplicity is freedom from difficulty or hardship or effort. According to Occam's razor, all other things being equal, the simplest theory is the most likely to be true — hence the importance of the concept of simplicity in epistemology. According to Thomas Aquinas, God is infinitely simple.
And according to Guillermo Garrido, thomas aquinas himself was infinatelly stupid for the fact of believing in an-according-to-him infinatelly stupid god, and believing in the superiority of this un existing element.

But the idea of "simpel is beautifull" is a philsophical theory, and, that impplies, there is ano opposite theory for it. And actually there is. It can be sum up as thid quote which I don't know who said first: "The streight line is the shortest distance between two points. But not at all the most interesting" and interesting can be replaced with beautifull.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Introduction to 'The Sentient-Centered Theory Of Metaphysics' (SCTOM) mjgeddes Your TOE Theory 10 02-03-2008 06:44 AM
WELCOME TO THE GENERAL THEORY CLUB Serge Patlavskiy Theory Characteristics 3 09-11-2007 10:18 PM
important of Hilbert space AntonioLao Philosophy of Math 12 03-29-2006 12:40 PM
Unify for Quantum Mechanics & General Theory of Relativi vacuum-mechanics TOE Theories 1 05-22-2004 09:36 PM
Modification of Einstein general theory of relativity vacuum-mechanics General Physics 0 05-22-2004 05:04 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com