[theunify]

Unlike briane greene and super string theory Robert has provided us with a forum to discuss open minded ideas with like-minded fellows. This is good because if we only accept one notion for scientific merit and overlook others our results come into question. In order for totality of correctness in our final conclusions all thoughts must collide to form one normal causualty. That is why I believe TOequest deserves the Nobel Prize, because we are actually furthering Truth in Science, Rather than forcing our Science as Truth!


Or So it goes..theunify

[Graybeard]

Originally Posted by theunify ..... This is good because if we only accept one notion for scientific merit and overlook others our results come into question. In order for totality of correctness in our final conclusions all thoughts must collide to form one normal causualty. Or So it goes..theunify

TheUnify ...

I agree with you. But Brian Greene is 'one notion of scientific merit'. What I mean is, in order for totality of correctness we cannot overlook string theory. Who knows, it may form part of the final theory?

greg

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Graybeard TheUnify ... I agree with you. But Brian Greene is 'one notion of scientific merit'. What I mean is, in order for totality of correctness we cannot overlook string theory. Who knows, it may form part of the final theory? greg

You know,you might be right there mate,on the other hand very wrong!

We will find out later?



regards michael.