Quote:
Originally Posted by N0B0DY  It's a lofty, noble endeavor, John, but as the genius I mentioned always says, "It is inevitable." Everyone is working on this technology and it will be used for selfish reasons and for war, which is why I oppose all parts of it. Perhaps Pat from this site might be able to offer assistance. I think he is an accountant. |
Hello NB:
I am very much aware of the natural odds of me being the one to come out on top, out of the millions that are in this race. But there are two things that keep me trying in spite of the odds.
#1: If I do nothing, the chances are ZERO.
#2: (((FAITH))) If we are correct in our assumption as to the existence of a greater intelligence, then it is the power of intention that will win without regard to the odds. Probability must also be the tool of the divine. I feel that the one that has the best intention for mankind will be the winner here. I do not mean me.
I mean whoever is best. If there is another with intentions as good or better and abilities as good or better I would be glad to add my efforts to this system or method. For the time being I have not found better, so I proceed. Not only do I not see better, I can not find any that work with the intention to improve the future of mankind. I have yet to see a viable idea that would replace what my goals are.
I would be MUCH HAPPIER if their was in fact many that were at least trying to improve the future of mankind in this area. To be honest. most are to busy with self capital, games and war. In history this will be seen as DIDDLING. Sort of like fiddling while Rome burns. I do my share if this along with everyone else out there. If we do nothing, nothing will get done. If we do something, something will get done.
The world is full of good intentioned people that do nothing but talk. The only thing that gets done is talk.
Anybody and everybody has something that they can add. Even if it is nothing more than moral support. I will produce a document that explains what the companion is, how it will work, what the outcome will be. I understand that it is not very clear at this point except for the people that I have already talked to about this. It will be a natural progression but it must begin and have a goal to get to the picture that I have in my mind.
I will write the document and post it on my blog. Give me a week to figure out exactly how I can explain what I am thinking Then I will bring up the idea of #13 again. For the time being any that have ideas as to the by laws for the creation of the non profit company that makes all customers like a stock holder so that all profits go back to the customers and employees.
Anybody can take the software and learn to use it when you have the time. This software will become the companion as we learn how to do this. Some people can help simply by trying to use it, and commenting on the functioning of the system. This is feedback. Feedback is needed. The way that the system works this is how most people will pay for the companion. By taking it and using it and sending back feedback. As we learn the system improves. Everyone involved simply does what they can. From talking to the system as a user to improving the system as a programmer. All people are treated the same. They are all members of the organization. This is why the by laws are so important they will be the keys to making this system function from the very beginning.
The software that I have at this point will be ready to give to people by August or September this year.
The text only communication network should be functional in May or June this year.
Maybe I should start a thread under philosophy that talks about the possibility of a not for profit company in this role?
At this point It would be interesting to me to see how many people would want to take this software to look at and comment on it?
John.
Linear Mode
