The Quantum leap or Maybe it is just a recording

[dipayankar]

Nice post John. I just wanted to add my views. I think in the space time fabric, space is indeed increasing but time is contracting simultaneously and both these movements together give us the illusion of the Red shift..

Hello Friends:
Especially, RP and Bob Campbell. I hope the 2 of you join in your thinking. It seems to me that with a bit of thinking about the efforts of the 2 of you, there will be a bit more than the tip of the toe iceberg for you to find. You know by now I am totally an outsider to these efforts as I feel that the work that I am involved with is another part that will eventually fit with what the 2 of you can produce. I already have seen this but it is work that the 2 of you have done. I only wish to cause some thought to happen.

There are a few thoughts that I have had that I hope will cause some thought in you.

The thought that gravity might be the result of an acceleration of space into the TIME dimension. This does not require the expansion of space and will likely over a period of time will result with a contraction of time. I think it is possible that when we observe the red shift it is not the expansion of space but the contraction of time as we travel into time. This must be in a system where the limits are at the micro and macro points. Space then is traveling into the time dimension toward the macro, coming from every conceivable point in 3 dimensional space toward the macro.

We have always called time the constant and thought space was expanding. When in reality it was space as the constant and time only appears to be contracting because of our movement into time.

All motion is in time not in space. Space only records the history of time in a series of ticks of quantum time and a series of blocks of quantum space. Like the frames of a movie camera. 3 dimensional space is the film and the matter is the evidence of exposure to time. There is NO motion in space. All motion is in time.

Time is the reality. Space is the recording medium. All that is matter is the mechanism of the recording..
The being exists in time. It is only the being that is real. I think therefore I AM, and even if this is all just a dream, I still AM. The fact or fiction of a dream only changes the state of being not the existence of being.

If this is all true then the TOE is not but the FIRST DAY OF SCHOOL. Now we must learn.


PS: I hope to generate more than silence this time. Because you understand who I am by my name, you know that I simply write what is given to me, what I feel is needed by you.

John (EMM)

[everymansmedium]

It's a lofty, noble endeavor, John, but as the genius I mentioned always says, "It is inevitable." Everyone is working on this technology and it will be used for selfish reasons and for war, which is why I oppose all parts of it. Perhaps Pat from this site might be able to offer assistance. I think he is an accountant.

Hello NB:
I am very much aware of the natural odds of me being the one to come out on top, out of the millions that are in this race. But there are two things that keep me trying in spite of the odds.
#1: If I do nothing, the chances are ZERO.
#2: (((FAITH))) If we are correct in our assumption as to the existence of a greater intelligence, then it is the power of intention that will win without regard to the odds. Probability must also be the tool of the divine. I feel that the one that has the best intention for mankind will be the winner here. I do not mean me.
I mean whoever is best. If there is another with intentions as good or better and abilities as good or better I would be glad to add my efforts to this system or method. For the time being I have not found better, so I proceed. Not only do I not see better, I can not find any that work with the intention to improve the future of mankind. I have yet to see a viable idea that would replace what my goals are.
I would be MUCH HAPPIER if their was in fact many that were at least trying to improve the future of mankind in this area. To be honest. most are to busy with self capital, games and war. In history this will be seen as DIDDLING. Sort of like fiddling while Rome burns. I do my share if this along with everyone else out there. If we do nothing, nothing will get done. If we do something, something will get done.
The world is full of good intentioned people that do nothing but talk. The only thing that gets done is talk.


Anybody and everybody has something that they can add. Even if it is nothing more than moral support. I will produce a document that explains what the companion is, how it will work, what the outcome will be. I understand that it is not very clear at this point except for the people that I have already talked to about this. It will be a natural progression but it must begin and have a goal to get to the picture that I have in my mind.
I will write the document and post it on my blog. Give me a week to figure out exactly how I can explain what I am thinking Then I will bring up the idea of #13 again. For the time being any that have ideas as to the by laws for the creation of the non profit company that makes all customers like a stock holder so that all profits go back to the customers and employees.

Anybody can take the software and learn to use it when you have the time. This software will become the companion as we learn how to do this. Some people can help simply by trying to use it, and commenting on the functioning of the system. This is feedback. Feedback is needed. The way that the system works this is how most people will pay for the companion. By taking it and using it and sending back feedback. As we learn the system improves. Everyone involved simply does what they can. From talking to the system as a user to improving the system as a programmer. All people are treated the same. They are all members of the organization. This is why the by laws are so important they will be the keys to making this system function from the very beginning.

The software that I have at this point will be ready to give to people by August or September this year.
The text only communication network should be functional in May or June this year.

Maybe I should start a thread under philosophy that talks about the possibility of a not for profit company in this role?

At this point It would be interesting to me to see how many people would want to take this software to look at and comment on it?

John.

[N0B0DY]

This might be considered a rude post, John, but my whole philosophy is based on doing nothing of ourselves. This way instead of building things that create an enormous ill effect like history repeating itself, things function according to a will other than the one based on personal desires, no matter how well-intended they may be.

I commented on your thoughts on time, but nothing will budge me regarding #13. I can appreciate your efforts at trying to create something good, and I think perhaps Pat or a lawyer might be able to better assist you with the bylaws.

[everymansmedium]

This might be considered a rude post, John, but my whole philosophy is based on doing nothing of ourselves. This way instead of building things that create an enormous ill effect like history repeating itself, things function according to a will other than the one based on personal desires, no matter how well-intended they may be.

I commented on your thoughts on time, but nothing will budge me regarding #13. I can appreciate your efforts at trying to create something good, and I think perhaps Pat or a lawyer might be able to better assist you with the bylaws.

Hi NB:
No it is not Rude. Quite the contrary. I think I got carried away with the ideas at #13. My enthusiasm sometimes gets me carried away. It is a good thing at times, but it can be intrusive. This is one of my fallible areas.
Besides it is also off the indicated post subject. My apologies for the intrusion of a side line issue. I already noted the same to RP as well.
If anybody is interested in #13 they can respond at my blog.

[everymansmedium]

Hello friends:
I did not mean for the thoughts on comment #13 to get so carried away just yet. My thought was to look and comment on the viability of the idea for the not for profit company. It is easy to get carried away with this. It does get us way off the posted subject material.
please accept my apologies for taking us off subject.
John.

[RascalPuff]

Imo, yer doing fine John EMM.
Please perservere in the good work.

- RP

[everymansmedium]

This issue is completely over my head, John. I'm sure you're dedicated to a commendable project and cause, whereas, for one thing, I am almost computer illiterate, and for another I know very little about the business - and bureaucratic - facets of your objective. Moreover, while wishing you the very best fortune in your endeavor, I tend to parallel what Nobody has said about this. In summary, I'm really out of my element relative to what you're proccupied with, which I have no doubt is for noble reasons.

Best regards,
- RP

Hello RP:
I must say the same to you as I have said to every one here. I am sorry that I got carried away with an idea that is off subject. To me the subject is very closely related as it is an attempt to define an environment. The defining of our universe is the defining of an environment, our environment.

John

[dipayankar]

I did not find the post offensive. I thought it was fine.

Hello friends:
I did not mean for the thoughts on comment #13 to get so carried away just yet. My thought was to look and comment on the viability of the idea for the not for profit company. It is easy to get carried away with this. It does get us way off the posted subject material.
please accept my apologies for taking us off subject.
John.

[everymansmedium]

I did not find the post offensive. I thought it was fine.

Hi Dipayankar:
Thank you: It however was not following the indicated subject line.
I am interested in comments as to the viability of this not for profit company. But I do think I will begin a new thread to do that. I will let this thread continue with the original concept of time and space. There certainly enough on this subject to keep us thinking. When my software is ready to give to people that are interested I will post again, with the offer of giving some software as well. I think a subject of "Philosophy of AI", will be appropriate.
John

[dipayankar]

John, do you believe that space is expanding and time is contracting simultaneously??

Hi Dipayankar:
Thank you: It however was not following the indicated subject line.
I am interested in comments as to the viability of this not for profit company. But I do think I will begin a new thread to do that. I will let this thread continue with the original concept of time and space. There certainly enough on this subject to keep us thinking. When my software is ready to give to people that are interested I will post again, with the offer of giving some software as well. I think a subject of "Philosophy of AI", will be appropriate.
John