[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick BTW Lloyd,if you further reply to this post,itwill prove to all fellow toequesters just how really "excited" you are about the whole idea? You have been cautioned my friend. regards michael.

I'm counting on enough posts against your self-unrealized insanity, may be enough to push you into the real state, and then we'd be rid of your nonsense...

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie I'm counting on enough posts against your self-unrealized insanity, may be enough to push you into the real state, and then we'd be rid of your nonsense...

You are grossly mistaken my friend and way of beam,if you think that day will ever arrive
like youarewith most of your other boring illusary nonsence you peddle as a sick relative
to some imagined reality existing in your worn out school book.

What it shows to me is that this idea "really excites" you,but youare afraid of giving in to
it,my advice is "let go" of your fear,and embrace this truth!


regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick You are grossly mistaken my friend and way of beam,if you think that day will ever arrive like youarewith most of your other boring illusary nonsence you peddle as a sick relative to some imagined reality existing in your worn out school book. What it shows to me is that this idea "really excites" you,but youare afraid of giving in to it,my advice is "let go" of your fear,and embrace this truth! regards michael.

Believe me MK, if you had any truth, I'd embrace it, but all I see is moot redundant ontological word spray, connected to absolutely no substance, and containing no substance. You forget the mind is no more than an infinite intuitive mirror of true and false axioms, the false axioms produced by the over-worship of the intuitive axiomator, of reflection back into a false spirit ego interpretation. You can not escape the infinite intuitive axiomator mirrors, you can only choose intuitive sanity or false-intuitive insanity___I choose real intuitive sanity, over your real intuitive-insanity...

regards,

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie Believe me MK, if you had any truth, I'd embrace it, but all I see is moot redundant ontological word spray, connected to absolutely no substance, and containing no substance. You forget the mind is no more than an infinite intuitive mirror of true and false axioms, the false axioms produced by the over-worship of the intuitive axiomator, of reflection back into a false spirit ego interpretation. You can not escape the infinite intuitive axiomator mirrors, you can only choose intuitive sanity or false-intuitive insanity___I choose real intuitive sanity, over your real intuitive-insanity... regards,

I think the mirror image reflection principle proves otherwise Lloyd,it suggests that you
are acutely magnetised to this relection of reality,but you are afraid to "launch out into
the deep" and accept it,possibly because you fear the reactions from your peers,well nevermind them Lloyd,I will accept you into the fold,come home son,all is forgiven.

regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick I think the mirror image reflection principle proves otherwise Lloyd,it suggests that you are acutely magnetised to this relection of reality,but you are afraid to "launch out into the deep" and accept it,possibly because you fear the reactions from your peers,well nevermind them Lloyd,I will accept you into the fold,come home son,all is forgiven. regards michael.

Sorry sonny, been there, done that___it's stupid!

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Lloyd Gillespie Sorry sonny, been there, done that___it's stupid!

If that is so then Lloyd,I suggest that you have had adequate time to make your point
on this thread,ie;that you do not accept the premise of this thread,that being so,i now ask
you to refrain from further posting here as you are becoming a nuisance and a distraction
from the thread theme.

I feel I have been very tolerant of your negitive comments,but that is enough,any more
will be deleted by me,and reported to Robert.


regards michael.

[Mr. Nobody]

Is not the simplest solution always right?
Why add a mind when none is required? Our surroundings are full of things without a mind and work perfectly without your mind
Chaos first, anthropic emergence of patterns in accordance with evolution next, mind last

[mkirkpatrick]

Originally Posted by Mr. Nobody Is not the simplest solution always right? Why add a mind when none is required? Our surroundings are full of things without a mind. Chaos first, anthropic emergence of patterns in accordance with evolution next, mind last

Well thats where we differ Mr Nobody,I have added nothing,mind is inherit within all
universal manifestation,including chaos,thats the whole premise of this thread,that the
entire physical universe is wholly and absolutely a product of mind.There is nothing only
mindful consciousness.

And of course evolution is the outworking on that mindful intention.


regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

I have often marveled at great buildings,in particular the pyramids and the Spinx,when I
look at these I have to remind myself that these great buildings were once just thoughts
in the architects mind that were then translated to paper,then drawn up to plan and scale.

Same to for this physical universe,which I firmily maintain is solely a product of mind too,
which came into being and is maintained within that original "thought form"we to then are also a product of mind and our very "existence" is no more than a thought form
too!



regards michael.

[mkirkpatrick]

Man cannot yet seem to grasp the basic fundamental power of thought,failure to see that
this very universe in which we live ,move,and have our being is purely the result of
willed ideation.

Motion arises from within the idea forming process,without this arisen consciousness
no motion,matter,or phenomenal existence would be possible!



regards michael.