An Idea that became a cosmos

[Mikal]

Thanks Drift....smiles....alls well between peaceful spirits...was feeling bad last night that you may have went away. So glad you didn't...


Peace Mikal

[Fredrick]

This is not a non-duality forum like the one I left before coming here...

Not wanting to stir up a conflict, but at this moment the question should be asked/answered/debated if we are then in an agreement that the potential (or god) can/should be seen as:

non-dual and/or dual;
singular and/or plural;
formed and/or not(yet)formed;
agreeing and/or disagreeing.

And that this exists all at the same time with the potential (and in some way exists with the materialized universe as well, but under stricter conditions we call natural laws), and that each individual choice/answer given about the potential is correct, but that collectively all choices/answers contain an automatic conflict if we include the process towards materialization.

Looking forward to see your replies.

[Drifter]

Not wanting to stir up a conflict, but at this moment the question should be asked/answered/debated if we are then in an agreement that the potential (or god) can/should be seen as:

non-dual and/or dual;
singular and/or plural;
formed and/or not(yet)formed;
agreeing and/or disagreeing.

And that this exists all at the same time with the potential (and in some way exists with the materialized universe as well, but under stricter conditions we call natural laws), and that each individual choice/answer given about the potential is correct, but that collectively all choices/answers contain an automatic conflict if we include the process towards materialization.

Looking forward to see your replies.

Each wayward soul makes an apparent choice, personally...or not...

[Drifter]

Not wanting to stir up a conflict, but at this moment the question should be asked/answered/debated if we are then in an agreement that the potential (or god) can/should be seen as:

non-dual and/or dual;
singular and/or plural;
formed and/or not(yet)formed;
agreeing and/or disagreeing.

And that this exists all at the same time with the potential (and in some way exists with the materialized universe as well, but under stricter conditions we call natural laws), and that each individual choice/answer given about the potential is correct, but that collectively all choices/answers contain an automatic conflict if we include the process towards materialization.

Looking forward to see your replies.

"And that this exists all at the same time with the potential."

Yes.

Answers to other querie's are in the Enneads as previously posted... duplication, is energy wasted...

Everything arises in Nothing...and Nothing Ever was/is/will be...

http://www.amaravati.org/abm/english..._is/03eta.html

[mkirkpatrick]

The most powerful force within this universe is that of absolute focussed intent,thought,
it is after all how we came into "apparent existence"!



regards michael.

[austintorn@aol.com]

Thanks, Michael and Drift,

Nothing never aries from nothing nor ever will. We are still what arose, be it from a near-nothing or a large intent. As products that arose, we live as we were made do for reasons unknown—and can participate in the dance or not.

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks, Michael and Drift,

Nothing never aries from nothing now ever will. We are still what arose, be it from a near-nothing or a large intent. As products that arose, we live as we were made do for reasons unknown—and can participate in the dance or not.

Quite so Austin,we arose from within the Absolute,and are still arising toward our
full potential.



regards michael.

[Drifter]

Thanks, Michael and Drift,

Nothing never aries from nothing now ever will. We are still what arose, be it from a near-nothing or a large intent. As products that arose, we live as we were made do for reasons unknown—and can participate in the dance or not.

wrong "I" Austin...

The ones who only saw one way were called the uncircumsized for a reason they didn;t/couldn't understand[hood-winked ... as it were/is] ...they were the literalists, in other words...the ultimate cosmic-joke.

hey buddy...you just pissed on my leg...
is your doctor Rabbi Cohen?
yes...but how'd you know that?
that explains it...he always cuts on a bias...!

[Fredrick]

Thank you, guys,

If I read between, up, under and through the lines (while ignoring some punches and ducks), I believe we agree.

[austintorn@aol.com]

Drift,

Say what you will… about 'wrong'… You already know the response about the rapture and the more than rapture…

The rabbi now circumcises elephants; the pay is low, but he gets big tips.

Good tidings to you all.