| Re: An Idea that became a cosmos
I'd like to contribute to this thread with requesting a closer look at words we use.
If we can listen carefully to these words: "In the beginning there was the word," would we then conclude this was really a word? Or should we see it as a description, spoken by an ancient speaker who used specific words that got repeated, but who really wanted to let us in on how the universe was thought to have come into being.
Did the speaker mean a word or did the speaker mean something else, such as movement, direction, pulse, interest, and the speaker could simply not find a better word than a word to use? Would the story have been accepted in those days if the speaker had said: an inclination? Would that have made that person laughable to others?
Michael, I think you are correct when mentioning that an idea started our universe. Yet, if you know some of my other posts, you also know that I believe it was an idea that went awry. Any ideas on such idea?
__________________
The difference between a structure based on unification and a structure without unification hinges on the question if nothing is just plain nothing or if nothing is mighty fundamental. Read In Search of a Cyclops with titillating mathematical evidence (see homepage) to find out if separation belongs to the fundamental basics of our universe - or not. | 
Re: An Idea that became a cosmos 
Linear Mode
