The theory of knowledge.

[socratus]

The Theory of Knowledge

The man acts: 1) at usual under logic program,
2) sometimes on intuition (unconsciousness).

Brain of a man approximately consists of sixteen million neurons. All of them form the system that manages human body. That is why it is of no wonder that with the work of all the sixteen million neurons of brain, a man cannot catch a single impulse of Electron, Quantum of light, his God:

(mass of electron is equal 10-31 kg., charge of electron is equal 10-19 k.)

Quantum of light, Spiritual particle, which has created us, turned out to be under control of the material existence. However, the spiritual particle aspires to establish its supremacy over material nature. And the possibilities to reign over material nature are limited. The expansion of the possibilities of the development of spiritual particle is connected with the creation of specific (vacuum) conditions. These conditions are reached as a result of constant religious practice. To perceive the universe, to perceive the spiritual essence, it is necessary to the man to take possession of religious practice.

PRACTICE. THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES.

We pray the GOD and we do not realize that HE is inside us. Each of us carries in him the SPIRITUAL PARTICLE(QUANTUM OF LIGHT - AN ELECTRON). But we do not realize that HE is inside us.
Behind the habitual forces of nature there is one force hidden - a spiritual one (h - е). But ITS action is almost completely disguised by the other forces (mechanical, electromagnetic, nuclear, and chemical and others). Therefore it remains unnoticed in an ordinary processes.

But God never operates outside of natural principles. There are the processes in which He reveals himself. Therefore, His disclosing is a technical question.
How can we learn it?

For this purpose it is necessary to create the following effects in our computer-brain:
A). Nonlinear effect
B). Superconducting effect
C). Holographic effect
D). Vacuum effect.

Nobody, except for us, can make this technical work. Only we (by the constant, thin, internal practice) can create conditions for these effects.
This practice has called "a Religious practice". In this lies an essence of Religion - to establish the communication of a Human being with his Divine origin.

Our computer-brain works on a dualistic basis.

In a usual daily life all we do is done logically, under an influence of our feelings. On the other hand, in a religious practice it is vital to learn to perceive and to operate:
1) Without the participation of the sense organs.
2) Without the participation of the logic mental processes.

When these conditions will be created, then the opportunity to operate will be given to a QUANTUM OF LIGHT (AN ELECTRON), to OUR DIVINE ESSENCE. We will acquire new forces, new abilities.

Once again.
An electron's mass is 10-28gr . The size is 10-13sm. A charge is 10-19k .
With these characteristics it is hard for IT to become apparent. Therefore it is clear, why don't we know IT in an ordinary life. ITS cognition is achieved by a very hard, thin and laborious work. This work demands of a person to be obsessed by it.

[baudrunner]

There is TOE science and there is practical TOE science.

In a practical Universe, God is, or was, as much an expression of the predetermined manifestation of consciousness as are we all. He learned to deconstruct reality in order to separate the corporeal from the spiritual, which is again a higher form that is dependent on the development of spiritual identity in the corporeal.

Insomuch as we are made in His image, we too will someday learn to deconstruct the physical realm, but that day is a function of probability because we may very well self-destruct before that happens.

To lean on God as being so far above us that he is capable of having created this Universe is not just irrational thinking, it is the product of an institutionalized mind which adheres to the premises postulated by individuals who had absolutely no scientific knowledge thousands of years before we decided that breaking the sound barrier would be an impossible task.

God is as real as you or I. But he is not GOD!

[Guille]

Socratus,

The unconsciousness is the greater part of our minds. The intuitional, emotional, sensational, primordial types of intelligences (and no so intelligent) are parts of the subconsciousness. The size of a thought is not measured by the time of activity it overtakes. The size of a thought is measured by the importance it overtakes in our activity. There is a great difference.

I like studying physics by analogy of a human being, and studying a human being by analogy of the society. It we look at humanity, the important figures that have changed more our lives, our world, and our system have all been extreme of some kind, critical, powerful, radical, inconformist and convinced. Good examples are Napoleon, Urban II (the pope), third Duke of Alba, Hitler, Bismark, Columbus, Lenin, Reagan... And in history class we study them, not anyone else (I'm not saying by this that these men were good, or great, or better than others, or more valuable...) Well the same in the mind. Hitler in 10 years revolutionized Germany and confronted Europe and the World, just like the feeling of anger during 5 minutes can change my view of the whole week.

What I'm trying to say is that although it may seem that we live in a rational, intelligent, scientifico-mathematical world, full of consciousness, it is because we live in the spacetime point where consciousness has occupied maximum of the mind, but still the sub/un consciousness, magical things, myths, religions, fanatism, feelings live and mark our lives and being.

[michellemfry]

Can the theory of knowledge tell me why we don't know everything all the time? Wouldn't it be more efficient? Wouldn't we expend much less energy and effort?

[Guille]

Can the theory of knowledge tell me why we don't know everything all the time? Wouldn't it be more efficient? Wouldn't we expend much less energy and effort?

Well, for example computers that have a really big capacity are not that fast, and vice versa. So knowing everything wouldn't be that efficient. In fact, it would be the less efficient point together with knowing nothing. The most efficient point, thus, would be the middle one: middle knowledge and middle speed, for a good working mind. Most people are near it, but some are extreme, not equilibrated.

[socratus]

The doctrine of a personal God could never be refuted by science.