[Robert]

Members, as you may have noticed, we have a new moderator. Neutralino has graciously excepted the role of moderator for the Cosmology and Physics forums and is working to revive the Scientific Study sub-forum so be sure and check out the changes there in the near future.

A little background... Neutralino is currently a research student in theoretical cosmology with the focus being the early Universe and inflation. He has an undergraduate degree in Mathematics with a specialization in Mathematical/Theoretical Physics. Neutralino has a firm grasp of relativity and is knowledgeable in quantum physics, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics and the mathematical fields of real/complex analysis, linear algebra and topology.

Let's welcome Neutralino as moderator and give him our support. It can be a tough job being moderator so, all of you, be good! Especially you Sally.

--Robert

[PoPpAScience]

I for one welcome Neutralino's input and knowledge in this forum. I think he is a great choice as a moderator.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Just as a fair critique I think Neutralino needs to work better at being an excellent moderator. He should be sure and see whether posts are on topic or not before he deletes them, and he should not put his personal apprehensions and disbeliefs in control of his actions. He should not judge, but lead by demonstration.

[Robert]

Originally Posted by purveyor of knowledge Just as a fair critique I think Neutralino needs to work better at being an excellent moderator. He should be sure and see whether posts are on topic or not before he deletes them, and he should not put his personal apprehensions and disbeliefs in control of his actions. He should not judge, but lead by demonstration.

Pok,

You're post was reinstated a while back. However, you were using Neutralino's thread as a spring-board to your 1/0 theory and that's not appropriate. It is rude to hi-jack a thread with your own agenda. Do as I recommended (in a PM) and start your own thread that you then link to from another.

As I stated in the first post, Be Good!

--Robert

[neutralino]

Thanks Robert and Allen. (btw, Robert, you spelt my name wrong in the opening post!)

PoK, please read your PM before you complain openly in the forums any further.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Neutralino, you did not send me a PM until after I pointed out your mistake. And Robert, I did not use Neutralino's thread as a spring board for my theory. It was Neutralino and Max Tegmark who did that. SO apparently it's not just my theory it's also Max Tegmark's and also the guy who wrote the website "Learning to See Timelessness." Gosh I'm just showing you guys the connections and you get all pissed off and jealous it seems.

[neutralino]

Originally Posted by purveyor of knowledge Neutralino, you did not send me a PM until after I pointed out your mistake. And Robert, I did not use Neutralino's thread as a spring board for my theory. It was Neutralino and Max Tegmark who did that. SO apparently it's not just my theory it's also Max Tegmark's and also the guy who wrote the website "Learning to See Timelessness." Gosh I'm just showing you guys the connections and you get all pissed off and jealous it seems.

I sent you a private message after your second offtopic post in that thread. How am I being a spring board for your theory when I have told you it is wrong?! Anyway, I'm not the one that's upset; it's pretty apparent from your use of language (which you should tone down) that you're the one that's getting upset!

Congratulations on hijacking yet another thread.

[purveyor of knowledge]

Thanks for helping me. Here's your problem. You think Max Tegmark is right and I am wrong. You are confused Neutralino in that regard.