Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Philosophy > Philosophical Thought
Reload this Page Can we find the Protyle Atom?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
exchange particles
Old
  (#11 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
exchange particles - 11-08-2005, 09:24 PM

objects with mass exchange gravitons at the speed of light. These exchanges make objects come closer together (attractive) and the distance between decreases so that the space in spacetime decreased since time is connected to space time must also decrease but instead it moves backward.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
unzip the shading and the idea pops out
Old
  (#12 (permalink))
Moderator
mkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to beholdmkirkpatrick is a splendid one to behold
 
mkirkpatrick's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 7,340
Thanks Given: 348
Thanked 703x in 655 Posts
Join Date: Aug 2005
Rep Power: 94
   
Smile unzip the shading and the idea pops out - 11-08-2005, 10:54 PM

Antonio,gravitons going backward in time to Before!Will they be able to leave
now and invelop in the before?A thought occurs about finding the protyle atom,
as we encounter finer and finer aspects of matter,then we will see that matter will enfold and entwine into mind,matter will and does Shade into mind,and is con
sciousness,the Atom would seem to be teasingly just outside of materiality by
a dimensional divide of no more than a proverbial Quark-deep!!So near and yet so far away.Maybe the destiny of all matter is to become-Realised and in so doing would unzip itself become finer and finer matter,until it transfigured back
into its original formless form?which is mind,then a cycle would be complete and
all the physical atoms would phase out of phenomenalbility and return to whence
they came the Protyle-Atom???

kindest regards michael.


Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#13 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-09-2005, 02:19 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
objects with mass exchange gravitons at the speed of light. These exchanges make objects come closer together (attractive) and the distance between decreases so that the space in spacetime decreased since time is connected to space time must also decrease but instead it moves backward.
I believe not. Gravitons make things go slower in time, but not backwards. And gravitons themselves don't go back in time, they go at the speed in time of the "time horizon" which I've invented, and it is something that each object with mass has.

By the way, if everything exchanges gravitons, then our thoughts also exchange gravitons. So, of course, that's it! As our brain is electric if we devide it's field by the mind's magnetic field, we get the gravitational field of our brain-mind duality. So this proofs the idea of magnetic minds and of E/M=G.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#14 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
11-09-2005, 12:59 PM

I need to use imaginaries again to clear up at the minimum about forward and backward time. And I need to rely on the idea of time axis again. Be back as quickly as is humanly possible without stepping backward in the time axis.

This image is showing the 4D spacetime geometry for a surface of the 4D sphere. The vertical z-axis the eternal sleeping axis of universal time. The angle phi indicates the alignment between an indiividual time axis and the universal axis. At time of death, these axes aligned. All matter at the same time axis exist along the circumference of the latitude circle.




the x-axis and the y-axis of the image are the space axis. If the speed is light speed then all existence are along the equator. Subluminal speed exist at the upper hemisphere. The lower hemisphere exist for all antimatter.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

Last edited by dleviwing : 03-19-2007 at 03:00 PM.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#15 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 01:45 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
Gravitons are pulling the time axes closer and closer to the universal axis.
Is the universal axis that of time, of space, or of what?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#16 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
11-11-2005, 02:47 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
Is the universal axis that of time, of space, or of what?
It is the universal time axis. As shown in the previous image, it is the vertical z-axis, pointing up for positive time and point down for negative time. But moving backward in time is just the change in angular orientation with respect to the universal time z-axis.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#17 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 03:04 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
It is the universal time axis. As shown in the previous image, it is the vertical z-axis, pointing up for positive time and point down for negative time. But moving backward in time is just the change in angular orientation with respect to the universal time z-axis.
And the universal time axis the time axis on which the universe is by it's expansion time speed, right?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
expansion and space axis
Old
  (#18 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
expansion and space axis - 11-11-2005, 03:16 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
And the universal time axis the time axis on which the universe is by it's expansion time speed, right?
The universal expansion is a variable of the space axis.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#19 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
11-11-2005, 03:19 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The universal expansion is a variable of the space axis.
But also of the time exis, right? It must, because universal expansion is both time and space.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
only magnitude
Old
  (#20 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,319
Thanks Given: 728
Thanked 124x in 122 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 74
   
only magnitude - 11-11-2005, 03:40 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
because universal expansion is both time and space.
only the magnitudes of the positive and negative components of the time axis changed not its direction or orientation.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Young's Experiment humanbydefault Philosophy Articles 1 05-20-2007 08:00 AM
Rediscovering the Atomic Model (Part One) humanbydefault Physics Articles 1 04-02-2006 05:48 PM
The story of PHOTON as I see it jessebonin Your TOE Theory 17 02-22-2006 09:18 PM
Rediscovering the Atomic Model (Part Two) humanbydefault Physics Articles 2 12-18-2005 11:55 AM
Alien Harmonics versus Quantum Mechanics