Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.

[socratus]

Science & Philosophy. Religion & Physics. XXIc.



The GOD, the ZERO and the MATERIAL WORLD .

The God could begin to create the Universe only in an absolute

reference system and only under physical and mathematical laws.

Now is consider, that an absolute reference system is

the cosmic microwave background radiation Т = 2,7К.

But this relic radiation is extending and decreasing.

Therefore in the future it will come to Т = 0К.

From Т=0К the physics begins.

From Т=0К the religion begins.

From Т=0К the philosophy begins.

From Т=0К the psychology begins.

From Т=0К the Genesis begins.

From Т=0К the formation of stars begins.

From Т=0К the God creates all.

How the God has made it?

The quantum physics approves, that in the beginning God has created

" virtual particles ".

Astrophysics approves, that in the beginning God has created " latent mass ",

"invisible particles ".

From them the God has created all.

But nobody knows, that such " virtual particles ",

that such " latent mass ", " invisible particles ".

About it and about the creation of Existence

it is telling in the book and on a site.

[socratus]

The Old Philosophical Problem.
The dispute on the divisibility of a particle has been conducted from ancient times.

There were two opposing views:

1) a particle can be divided infinitely,
2) the division of a particle comes to an end when it reaches the ultimate particle

They began by splitting a body into finer and finer parts: to molecules,

molecule to atoms, atoms to electrons, protons and neutrons.

Then they constructed accelerators. They began see if protons and neutrons

could be divided into other elementary particles and in the process,

creating so many particles that it is even difficult to list them.

But physicists do not believe that there is a true initial particle.

In listening to their explanation of the situation in the microcosm, one is reminded of a madhouse. Only there is it possible to learn that the part is more than whole.

When physicists began to study the macrocosm, they were sure that

in using the formulas, equations and laws they relieved the

consciousness of man from prejudice. Therefore the physics was considered

an ally of common sense. But when they began to study the microcosm,

they began to complain of paradoxical devices. Then physics became an enemy

of common sense.

Can physics be paradoxical? Can nature be paradoxical? Is it the

laws of nature or the thinking of the physicist?

A Simple example.

From the time of Newton–Huygens, the dualism of light was known

and debated. To set the question:

If we ask how can the wave become a particle, the question will be paradoxical.

But if we ask how the particle can create waves, the question will be logical.

For over 300 years there has been no one that formulated such a question.

[socratus]

The tree is covered with a lot of leaves.

The leaves rustle, speak, argue among themselves.

But shouldn't they know that the roots feed them?

Physicists behave as leaves.

They rustle, speak, argue among themselves.

But they forget the roots of science, namely that we build the base

of a science on abstract ideas.

The base of the classical mechanics is constructed on abstract

Separate absolute space and abstract separate absolute time of Newton.

The base of thermodynamics is constructed on the abstract

ideal gas theory.

The base of the theory of radiation is constructed on

the abstract black body theory.

The base of SRT is constructed on the abstract theory

of four-dimensional space theory.

On this abstract base, physicists build a concrete building of

science and are surprised when they discover paradoxes in it.

But in nature there are no paradoxes observed.

Something is not in order with logical thinking.

It is necessary to stop, look back and

to reconsider the abstract base of science.

But everyone is in a hurry to try to understand reality,

and they create new abstraction. It is a way to “mad infinity”.

Therefore we live in the world of abstraction, of paradoxes,

in the Orwell,s world.

How to break off this circuit of abstraction?

* * *

If you have time and desire, I ask you to visit my site

http://www.socratus.com

Bestwishes.

Socratus.

[socratus]

The laws of physics and mathematics in the different countries of the world

are identical, but religions - different. Why?

Because the religion is not proved by the laws of physics and mathematics.

And unless it is possible?

In my book and on a site I approve that it is possible.