[purveyor of knowledge]

Originally Posted by neutralino Please attempt to stay on track in this thread. I will not give "alternative definitions" to points relevant to your theory in someone else's thread!

Then you will have nothing to say at all. There is no such thing as an opinion that serves to divide.

KJ,
I totally agree with everything you're saying. Nothing exists outside of the universe in principle. That is very true.

So basically you are saying that the definition of everything is that nothing must be greater than everything. Correct? Additionally, it seems also to be true of nothing that the value of nothing must be smaller than every other value. This means that nothing must be less than everything. So it is demonstrated to be true that nothing is both greater than and less than everything. At least that's how it would appear if you think about it

0<1/0<0

[N0B0DY]

Originally Posted by Profpat Thats odd, I would think anything is better than nothing. There is a theory of nothing thread, however, that you may be interested in. Best, Pat

I think no poke in the eye is better than a poke in the eye, but it's true that nothing is a misnomer. The point being that nothing and everything are equated as absolutes, which with regards to this thread would be rendered: neither nor; therefore not.

Further, only 0/0 can equal nothing, something, anything, everything, and even the elusive infinity because no number, some number, any number, every number, and an infinitely large number or an infinite amount of numbers multiplied by zero equals zero. To imply that the net effect of the absolute omniverse equals zero.