understandability and simplicity and reproducibility.Originally Posted by GUILLE
understandability and simplicity and reproducibility.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
What is that principle (accountability) then have to do with the other two, probability and relativity? And, most fundamentally, what does it have to do with the base for these two principles, dependency?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
it brings us back to Einstein's dream of determinism and absolute certainty that probability is always 1.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Yes. But it's exactly the opposite of what relativity and probability are, they are preciselly about not being sure, but accountability is being sure. Why should unifying them make any good?Originally Posted by AntonioLao
the unification of relativity and probability becomes absolutivity. There is no traces of the two previous disciplines.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
But this absolutivity is only absolute for each particular different relative-probabilistic case. So there are infinatelly many of these absolutivities.Originally Posted by AntonioLao
But not the one with infinity as a solution.Originally Posted by GUILLE
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
Physics will soon begin to value the idea of mind being the essence matter,
there will be a bridge between the esoteric sciences of the east and the exoteric disciplines of the west.This merging will bring a sense of enlightenment.
kind regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)