Welcome to the ToeQuest.
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 28 of 28
  1. #21
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    ACCOUNTABILITY?
    understandability and simplicity and reproducibility.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  2. #22
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    understandability and simplicity and reproducibility.
    What is that principle (accountability) then have to do with the other two, probability and relativity? And, most fundamentally, what does it have to do with the base for these two principles, dependency?

  3. #23
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    determinism and absolute certainty

    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    what does it have to do with the base for these two principles, dependency
    it brings us back to Einstein's dream of determinism and absolute certainty that probability is always 1.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  4. #24
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    it brings us back to Einstein's dream of determinism and absolute certainty that probability is always 1.
    Yes. But it's exactly the opposite of what relativity and probability are, they are preciselly about not being sure, but accountability is being sure. Why should unifying them make any good?

  5. #25
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158

    absolutivity

    the unification of relativity and probability becomes absolutivity. There is no traces of the two previous disciplines.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  6. #26
    The Thinker
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Spain
    Posts
    3,278
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks Given
    0
    Thanked 12x in 9 Posts
    Rep Power
    63
    Quote Originally Posted by AntonioLao
    the unification of relativity and probability becomes absolutivity. There is no traces of the two previous disciplines.
    But this absolutivity is only absolute for each particular different relative-probabilistic case. So there are infinatelly many of these absolutivities.

  7. #27
    Raider of the lost time
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    11,784
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thanks Given
    1,106
    Thanked 1,474x in 1,194 Posts
    Rep Power
    158
    Quote Originally Posted by GUILLE
    So there are infinatelly many of these absolutivities.
    But not the one with infinity as a solution.
    Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²

  8. #28
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    11,625
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    296
    Thanked 896x in 724 Posts
    Rep Power
    154

    Smile a melding process will unfold.

    Physics will soon begin to value the idea of mind being the essence matter,
    there will be a bridge between the esoteric sciences of the east and the exoteric disciplines of the west.This merging will bring a sense of enlightenment.






    kind regards michael.
    Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
    reveal herself?

 

 
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Excellent undergraduate physics program
    By PassatAmnesiac in forum General Physics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-20-2005, 08:48 PM
  2. A New Foundation for Physics
    By volantis in forum TOE Theories
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 09-17-2005, 08:32 AM
  3. Sequential Physics and the Time Derivative
    By Rod Johnson in forum Introductions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-31-2005, 11:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Back to top