Before evolution was Involution.

[harmonygirl]

Are you leaving out half of humanity, rp, or do these only apply to men?

[r.p.bibra]

gr;ls. stands corrected; the thought relates to the entire universe.if 'interconnectivith' is followed in earnest, this world would be living in harmony.ls.

"When ignorance and its concomitant& delusion disappear, the Athma (soul, inner voice) in everyone shines in its splendour. All that we see is as a mirage, the superimposition of something over the Real and the mistaking of that for this. things have a beginning and they end, they evolve and involve, there is evolution as well as involution. When all is subsumed by involution, or as Prahlaya (dissolution), only Moolaprakrithi or the Casual Substance endures. Only the Unmanifested Cause survives the universe dissolution".
A FOOD FOR THOUGHT.
dear michael, the above is an extract from an ancient indian book. inolution is a complete science, but it is the inverse side of the evolution.ls.

[mkirkpatrick]

is this another take on aether?

In a nutshell,Harmony,No!

regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

could you clarify the relationship between the protyle principle and aether?

[mkirkpatrick]

I will attempt to clarify Harmony,the protyle principle,(atom)and the aether.
As I see it,the Protyle principle is the "point of emergence",the singularity,
It is the "point" where intent motions from absolute unity,and via the portal
of entry,"the singularity,into what will now shortly become our universe.The
aether is then unfolded from within this already placed "notion"The aether
unfolds to then provide a "field" for the shortly to arise dynamics of
expansion and energy transferences!It is also at this time that the Ying
and Yang are brought into play,and unfolded,as coming conductors of force
via the economy and principle of the vortex?Hope this helps Harmony.

kindest regards michael.

[harmonygirl]

thanks for that Michael. I am afraid I don't understand your reference to economy and how it fits...

[mkirkpatrick]

thanks for that Michael. I am afraid I don't understand your reference to economy and how it fits...

Prehaps I should have omitted the reference to economy,as that was more
than the question asked warrented!

regards michael.

[jim barlow]

Evolution and its contrary (by whatever name) have to be occuring simultaneously.
I think the mind has a single issue training (guilty or innocent, male or female etc). This two-valued logic (I think they call it) is practical for politics but it has a tendency to invade other thinking as well where it can be quite impractical leading to all kinds of distortions.

Why 2 value? Why not 3 or 4? Why not one which includes both opposites?
I think it should depend on the situation.

[mkirkpatrick]

You have raised an interesting notion there Jim,why not more than two,reminds me of
the saying there are two sides to this story!Why not three or four!

regardsmichael.