Welcome to the ToeQuest.
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    29

    "Between the devil and the deep blue sea"

    As Hume expressed in his old years, humanity will never be able to [physically] see into the deepest secrets of matter, space and time due to our own limitations, however I believe that we could make a faithful representation of such puzzles with the help of our mind.

    BETWEEN THE DEVIL AND THE DEEP BLUE SEA
    (Article number five)

    “The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.” [Albert Einstein]

    “I personally like to regard a probability wave as a real thing, certainly as more than a tool for mathematical calculations… How could we rely on probability predictions if we do not refer to something real and objective?” [Max Born on quantum mechanics]

    I’m glad to know that a good part of my previous articles have been welcomed with a mix of confronting feelings and emotions… after all, we are just humans. It will take some time before, those who had manifested sincere interest on them, will be able to process in their minds some of the concepts expressed in plain and simple words. It won’t be an easy task to accept the representation of reality in other fashion completely different than a pure “abstract mathematical formalism.”

    Today as usual, I will talk more about those alien “propositions” and “universe of discourses” that in just a matter of days have earned the attention of so many people interested in the secrets of our universe and how the last was actually seen through alien eyes.

    But before going straight ahead to analyze in detail a couple of physical phenomena that have been the center of countless investigations worldwide, allow me to quote a small paragraph about the dangerous “scattering” of probabilistic conclusions from those who believe themselves to be the rightful ambassadors of the truth:

    “To be fair, some recent works deal with the latest results, which would be excellent news were it not for the fact that the authors often embark on wild speculations. This is a dangerous trend, as much for the public at large as for philosophers, who have difficulty finding their way, especially since some reputable physicists are among the writers. They certainly deserve praise for reporting on the current avenues of research, but they mislead the reader by not sufficiently warning* him or her that these avenues may well lead nowhere. It is so easy to dream with the help of some mathematics in the wonderland of general relativity.” [“Quantum Philosophy” Roland Omnes, physics professor].

    I guess you will find easier to understand why aliens find themselves “between a rock and a hard place.”

    It took millenniums in the history of those worlds before accepting such concepts as “instantaneous action of the entire universe upon violations of its rules,” “Faster than light speed” or “infinitesimally small specks of energy and mass.” On the other hand, humans haven’t had any problem in accepting (without unanimity) an incredibly formal concept of a “wave function.” Due [in part] to the obvious impossibility of explaining a paradoxical limitation in the act of a simultaneous measuring of the position and the momentum of a human-assumed-to-exist “sub-atomic particle,” such “partial compromise” immersed in a background of probabilistic approaches came to the rescue of an old vision of reality.

    “Science should never compromise on the strict basis of satisfying merely blind demands imposed by a bunch of happy observers.” “Said to me once an alien colleague not long ago”

    Was Einstein wrong when he stated the speed of light as a universal constant? Of course not! The speed of light [and we know that light is made out of photons whose nature was no other than that of bosons] was the fastest one a quantum of energy could propagate across the ether. The speed of propagation of quantized energy throughout space always depends on a necessary feedback mechanism found in the nature of the ether. We have learned recently from alien harmonics that the speed of an electron and that of the photon as well were the same in the vacuum even though we now know that electrons were nothing more than E-M energy re-modulated at both sides of two atomic couplings. Fermions [outside the atom] ultimately were the “manufacture” of energy of two [bonding] fermions made possible through the existence of a bond or “entangled couplings” provided the right supply of external energy. We have said [make no mistake about it] that such phenomenon occurred at every scale in the structure of the atom, inside the nucleus, the molecule, the crystal and so on.

    So, we can see that electrons are more complex in their physiognomy than their “primitive cousins” we know as photons. The spin of E-M energy modulated inside an entangled coupling with the capacity of modulation equal to “one-electron mass” is what aliens know as electrons. The same conditions for modulation but inside “quarks bonding” are responsible for the scattering of “protons” and “neutrons” outside the atom once a higher and denser energy was provided by particle collisions inside “atom smashers.”

    After this short recapitulation of concepts I believe we could continue with the truth behind the speed of light. So, Einstein was right in his conclusions. He ignored the roll of mass in the propagation of a quantum across the vacuum and that was unfortunate, but hey! No one is perfect! [Not even aliens ok?]

    Is then a contradiction here when I spoke of the existence of a speed faster than light [in more than one case] in the realm of physical reality?

    [BREAK]
    Absolutely not! The only thing missing in the human interpretation of the “Law of conservation of energy” was the speed at which that specific process takes place in the quantum world. Given the limitation in observing such impressive speed they have built in “their hearts and minds” the existence of particles [they don’t know where they came from or what they are] and all these years they have taking them for granted. We have constructed our theories and models of representation based on the rightful existence of matter with a mind of its own. There are places in this universe [just in case you didn’t know] where matter was present in such state that mass was not part of the equation at all. Plasma and nebulas are just a couple of those places where some form of energy replaced the roll of mass… You know what I’m talking about here, are you? If not, I suggest you to read my earlier articles… It will be fun!

    This is a very curious point indeed, so let’s make quick stop right here and see inside the atom for other thing than just mass.

    Did the universe actually cool itself as we have probably read in every single book about astronomy? No way! This is what I referred to every time I see a bunch of aliens having such a good time while reading our science books… It just hurt to see that!

    Across eons, radiation energy has been conveniently stored inside each and every atom, molecule and crystal forming part of planets, moons and stars inside hundreds of galaxies. All that power was hidden inside what we see today as cold and visible matter around us. It’s practically impossible for a standard human mind accepting at first glance such incredible truth but it was practically demonstrated here on Earth fifty years ago with the first nuclear explosion in American soil.

    Where did you think that huge amount of radiation energy came from? The fission of the atomic nucleus of “enriched” Uranium or Plutonium liberated an energy that have been kept safely guarded from immediate dissipation across billions of billions of years. I said immediate dissipation because during that long period of time a process called decay had been the only one in charge of keeping a perfect balanced inside the structure of energy interactions at deeper levels of atomic nuclei. Now and then a small but quantized magnitude of radiation energy was able to leave the internal structures of the nucleus in order to keep up with a slowly but surely change in the evolutionary state of the universe.

    Listen to this, guy! They may be just a bunch of green ugly fellows, but they know their stuff…

    The other night I was at an alien bar having a couple of drinks of some alien stuff when a drunken alien came to me and said “-You humans… why can’t you accept that even green people could be right sometimes…” – And suddenly he fell asleep. I couldn’t hold any longer a good human laughing in front of everyone else, however if my alien friends weren’t there to rescue me from the crowd I could have ended up sold as slave in a far-reaching alien colony … The first human slave of the quantum era!

    The “Cartesian Project” seems to gain popularity among “process philosophers” along with intellectual followers of Bohr’s vision on the ultimate roll of science. Logos have imposed their will over words. The fundamental laws of the universe at work in the quantum world are being baptized with formalism and probabilistic outcomes.

    Dr. Richard Feynman used to say to his students that it was literally impossible to imagine an electromagnetic field. I wouldn’t be so sure about that…

    I will ask you to imagine in your mind the lines of force spreading out from a magnet. Do you remember the pattern obtained after we pour some tiny skirls of metal around a magnet?

    Of course you do! So! Think of those “lines of force” as what they really are… harmonics!

    Their energy [magnetic force] decreased following the inverse square law. The longer the distance from the magnet the lower the presence of energy in space. The areas where no tiny piece of metal was found corresponded to the gap where harmonics were “neutral.”

    I bet you still remember what I wrote in this regard in my article titled “Alien Harmonics versus Quantum Mechanics.” I said that the same harmonics recognized as “neutrons” [human particles] were the same projection of “complete sub-shells” in electron orbits and those were also the same ones across the crystal.

    Between those “neutral patterns” where energy and harmonic was filled to its ultimate capacity the spatial projection of another incomplete pattern [“unknown particle”-quarks-protons-“one electron sub-shell”-crystal] was spreading too. The case of ferromagnetic metals is a special case and an interesting one.

    Resuming what I said earlier, we could say that those harmonics could be considered as 1 or 0. In the case energetic fulfillment is achieved as in the case of neutrons and complete electron sub-shells the case is 0. If on the other hand, harmonics spreading in octaves from the core of the atom are in their incomplete state of energy with respect to harmonic capacity we could say that the case is 1. Being that the case of protons, one electron sub-shell and the case mentioned of tunneling when the projection reaches the other side of the barrier. Today we could consider every atom like one atom of hydrogen with one-electron energy in its outermost orbit. It’s been finally observed that each sub-shell holds the capacity for “two-electrons,” that being the case of 0. In the case the outermost orbital where the bond takes place held just “one electron” the case corresponded to 1. The big difference between the human argument just mentioned and the truth as aliens have stated before was reduced to say that couplings were in fact harmonics and those ones where the result of spatial projections also originated after the interaction of deeper ones. Fair is to say that quarks, protons, neutrons and electrons were the results of a desperate attempt of pure deadly radiation energy trying to avoid final dissipation. It’s fair to say that no matter who was right in representing the truth and describing reality, the winner will always be science.

    [BREAK]

    THE SECRET BEHIND THE ABILITY OF MAGNETS TO PRODUCE CURRENT

    The amazing secret hidden in ferromagnetic materials is that the spatial spreading [configuration] of the field-harmonics is holding the magnitude of one-electron energy in each line of force.

    That’s why little pieces of metals were attracted just like vectors in space. That’s why a wire was capable of manufacturing electrical current [your electrons outside the atom] when moved near a magnet.

    Recapitulating a little bit, I said earlier that in order to “fabricate” an electron [as current] we needed to guarantee that an exact and quantized magnitude of external E-M energy was applied to the couplings forming the lattice of the wire, neither a little more nor a little less. The reason was simple: ‘to push dust up to the intermolecular space allowing the absorption of E-M energy in place of mass inside the entangled “modulator.”

    Q/ What E-M energy are you talking about?

    A/ Didn’t I say that the energy equivalent to one-electron was present in each “line of force” coming from the magnet across space?

    By moving a wire making it cross those mentioned “lines of force” [our harmonics] the exact magnitude of energy needed to fill the oscillator was properly supplied, mass was forced to exile for a short while and everybody happy!

    We could do it with a battery… No big deal! But Faraday discovered in 1831 that even a magnet could produce electrical currents. It was a great discovery however after all this time the “science” behind its true nature remains fuzzy among most human physicists. The same way the concept of “a force at a distance” used by Newton with respect to gravity and later on by Faraday when referring to the lines of force present in magnetic fields has become a cross too heavy to carry out on our backs. The same “ghost” appeared once again in Einstein’s EPR experiment when trying to make a link between the collapse entanglement of the green photon with the instantaneous reaction of the blue photon in Betelgeuse. Whether no parallel stands between both examples, the sole mentioning of “force at a distance” is capable of terrorizing the heart of any human physicist.

    Back to our magnets and their singular harmonic projection, aliens could find only one explanation to it:

    A configuration of harmonics coming from the nucleus of the ferromagnetic atom was able to promote such special overlapping model that enabled the magnet [well beyond the boundaries of the metal itself] to establish across space a repetitive pattern of one-electron energy. It is possible to imagine such case if we assumed that some sort of feedback mechanism could be at work between harmonics projected from the magnet and the nature of the vacuum itself. The strength of the field as we all know depends in the orientation of the molecules inside the lattice of the material, after all its representation is calculated as a simple mathematical operation using nothing but vectors. The answer is hidden inside the nucleus of iron. Solenoids are a vivid example of how the pattern of space-projected harmonics [lines of force] is reinforced or amplified while using iron metals in the core of electromagnets.

    One last word about the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics. In my first article “The Young Experiment” I mentioned the roll of the ether [vacuum] in the final making of a spectrum observed on the screen. As you may recall, I said that we were in the presence of two completely different SCALES interacting with each other in the same experimental setup. The laws governing gravity [the true nature of the ether] and the mechanics of a quantum wave of E-M energy [be that an electron or a photon] in a mutual interaction. Then, there was the “MASS FACTOR” too. All that forced humans to create all sort of paradoxes starting from the actual determination over the identity of the slit used by a given “particle” during its commute toward the screen to an assumed “diffraction” caused by the slit on the wave. Theories upon theories have filled thousand of pages in the WEB and the race to find the “magic answer” keeps on going even as we speak.

    Parallel worlds, interchangeable wave functions along with cohesive “particleness” as in some sort of double personality syndrome have been tried over and over again… There is no limit to human imagination!

    It is the confrontation between scales that allowed uncertainty into the fabric of theoretical physics. It was the human made concept of “particleness” and our human limitation to observe the actual speed of action of the entire universe upon any single violations of its rules what have anchored in one place our abilities to acquire better ways to properly describe and genuinely represent physical realities.

    The “Cartesian Project” won’t be complete until each property, axiom, operator, and projector will acquire a meaningful sense, a perfect correspondence with a theory, where causality and determinism are again part of our language.

    M. De Zayas [author]

    For previous articles go to www.toequest.com and look for “humanbydefault.” To know more about harmonics go to www.humanbydefault.com

    Copyright 2005
    Last edited by Robert; 03-26-2006 at 03:36 PM. Reason: Added Byline to to associate with other 4 articles

  2. #2
    The Observer dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold dleviwing is a splendid one to behold
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    2,140
    Blog Entries
    5
    Thanks Given
    25
    Thanked 144x in 95 Posts
    Rep Power
    58

    Poor science

    M. De Zayas;
    I can sympathize with you in the sense that what you have read in popularized books and articles, are confusing and complex. The reality though, is that this is nothing more than hype of simple concepts and methods. Anyone who actually believes that probability and uncertainty is anything more than a simple statistical mathematical method applied to a collection of data, are being foolish and ignorant.

    It is like seeing an advertisements of a movie and believing that it will be great. This is hype and many times when you spend your money to see it, you come away disappointed and feeling lied to.

    The only solution is to do your own study or pay your money to acquire a true education.
    It would appear that you are doing your own study but have not yet realized the difference between the science of measurement, the philosophy of science, and science fiction.

    Your paper shows a gross misunderstanding of the terminologies used in science.



 

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Back to top