The Young's Experiment

[humanbydefault]

“The Young's experiment” [Part One]
(Article number one)

"The planet of HUMONS, also known to aliens as “glue-seekers” are creatures of duality [genius-ignorance] who behave either way depending how they are confronted and tested.”

“Where fiction equals science by the square of common sense” (M. De Zayas, 2005)

Never before in the history of humanity the concepts of human intuition, logic and common sense had been regarded as an unfortunate “liability” rather than a blessing. The “metamorphosis” observed in the last hundred years in the field of science namely in theoretical physics and philosophy, have put humankind's intellectual abilities to the test. Randomness and uncertainty have become part of our own reality ever since.

The subject of this article as its title anticipates is about “The Two Slit Experiment.” The conclusion of this story will put an end to a puzzle that has been the center of speculations among humans for seven generations.

Yes! All the answers to “Why the spectrum?” “Which slit your little “particle” went through?” and finally, “Why ‘the wave-particle duality' was an evil compromise between Lie and Truth” will be part of the arguments presented for the first time in layman terms in such simplicity that even a high-school human kid would understand it.

At the end of the day just one thing will count:

“FACTS ENTIRELY BASED ON EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS.”

This is what this article is all about…………….F A C T S!

This is a completely new “Ball Game”! You're invited to suit-up and join a team.

Let's go straight to the subject of my article.

The secrets you are about to learn in the next five minutes will be a final test to the nature of your duality as a HUMON. The alien science you will soon confront will give you answers you couldn't imagine. In a clear contrast with “String Theory” your elusive tactics whether “it's all about pure philosophy” and “they can't be proved” won't work this time!

Alien concepts have been supplied with detailed instructions to collect enough data employing nothing but primitive terrestrial instrumentation available in the planet of HUMONS in the year 2005.

I have included two tips and an original idea that could help you to get the Noble Prize of 2006 in physics. How does it sound to you?

Let's start my story with an experiment that has defied the best HUMON'S minds in the last two centuries.

I think that it's not necessary for neither of us repeating the set-up of the experiment and its final conclusions as it has been performed countless times in every physicist's laboratory around the world.

The aim of my story is to prove that there are “hidden variables” as Einstein used to refer in the past in regard to the “weird” nature of Quantum Mechanics. “God never play dice as he wisely said… We did.”

I will have to use a little bit of “magic” if you will… I will ask you to open your mind to an “alternate reality,” in other words I will describe to you how a sci-fi writer would explain the conclusive results so well documented by experimentalists during the so-controversially famous two hundred years old experiment with light.

The only condition I will ask from you is to relax and, at least for the duration of these readings, put all sorts of mathematical considerations aside and think like a physicist for a change.

Great! Before we start I need to introduce you with some necessary concepts we will see in their entirely new reformulation… It's a completely different universe remember?

Let's start first with the difference between mass and matter.

In “my universe” mass is described as “infinitesimally small specks of “dust,” so tiny that we can't see them at all. We had to wait until energy popped into the equation to “make it visible.”

I guess we may call it “Dark Matter” but to be honest with you I preferred to call it “Dark Mass” instead.

What is matter then? Now this is the tricky part! If you thought that mass was the only one with the rights to be so tiny you were wrong this time too. Energy is in our alternate universe as infinitesimally small as dust could be since both were the result of a terrible explosion that occurred with the genesis of our universe. After the “Big-Bang” those little specks of tiny radiation energy began to interact with each other following a process of integration as more and more tiny specks of energy became part of the fusion.

There is a new theory that explains this integration of “point-energies” in space; the name of the theory is “String Theory.” Well, they see those interactions as “strings” or vibrations of energies in a bunch of spatial dimensions that I lost count of, but I'll tell you a little secret:

Those “vibrations” in space are nothing more than “Standing Nuclear Waves.” … What did I just say? I know… another new crazy concept!
[BREAK]
The smallest piece of matter in the universe is called atom…

Q. “Wait a second alligator! Our books make references to “sub-atomic particles with names like quarks, protons, neutrons and electrons among many others, are they matter too?”

A. No! But this will take more of your time and imagination to explain.

What is an atom? It couldn't be simpler I promise. The atom is a result of many of those specks of energy we talked about before in a complex structure of mutual integration. The only way energy guarantees its “survival” which also means its perpetuity in its lowest possible state is achieving a pattern of “Standing Waves.” Do you need a better proof of that statement than sound waves inside a room? Our universe is a fairly big “room” with no walls or physical boundaries we know about, but the existence of energy in it depends on its own ability to reach a perfect symmetry.

Let's continue with our atom and its “internal anatomy.” We all know the pattern of interference called “standing waves.” The process that takes place at the core of the atom is ultimately responsible for the presence of harmonic levels of energy spinning around it. If you could imagine in your mind a complex pattern of elliptical standing waves overlapping among each other I bet it would be pretty easy for you to come across the image of a “string”… Was that too difficult to picture inside your mind?

I know that you know that “standing waves” have an elliptical shape on space, due to the sum of two waves in the region called “anti-nodes.” There it is why you have observed that contrary to earlier assumptions over spherical electron orbits, now it is a fact that those waves are elliptical in shape. Curiously as it sounds, that is exactly the same reason for the elliptical shape of planetarium orbits around the sun and the very same one for huge galaxies too… It's all a matter of scales.

Before we get to that point I have a very important question to ask you:

Is the perfect vacuum possible in our universe?

I hope that your answer was “NO” and we all agree on that. Are evidences to support such statement required in this case? No problem!

Have we ever reached the absolute temperature of 0 Kelvin? I tell you why not in a moment.

At that low temperature free energy is zero, which means that there is absolutely no energy in that spot of space. I want you to give me the benefit of the doubt when I say that there is nothing in this universe that prevent energy from moving from one point to the other. There is no “barrier” or obstacle of any kind that could stop thermodynamic energy from spreading across space.

Why is that so important in this discussion about the atom? Simple! The atom is permeated by heat from the surroundings and that heat share with mass (dust remember?) the “empty space” across those spinning patterns we spoke before. What was that all about…?

Open you mind because I will share with you the greatest secret of all!

As those patterns of “Standing Nuclear Waves” spin around confronting specks of radiation, energy in the form of waves cancel each other off as they complete their momentum.

At the very point in space where mutually interfering energy waves cancel each other off a perfect vacuum is about to “open” a breach in the universal law that defines a proportional density energy-mass at that specific point in space. In the rescue of that density violation, mass rush to the scene from the vacuum and takes its place inside the atom. Now we have a proportional amount of mass spinning around inside a pattern created by confronting energies.

We also have a multi-level structure of harmonics known by physicists as orbital following the familiar “Standing Wave” pattern known to us in music. I don't know about you but the whole thing start looking more and more like the atom we see in our observations.

Q. You mean that mass or dust is not an intrinsic part of “particles” anymore?

A. As you just heard it! Furthermore, the density of dust inside each harmonic depends on the temperature of the medium where the atom takes part being that a gas, a liquid or a solid. Along with dust a quantifiable magnitude of heat [part of the “spinning mix”] is constantly “modulated” by the internal structure of the harmonic in a pattern called “phonon.” They are mathematically speaking: in inverse proportionality. We all know that this secret I've just told you have signed once and for all a “death sentence” to materialism in HUMON'S history… Such a pity! However let's concentrate in physics for the time being.

A Noble Prizewinner, Dr. Richard P. Feynmann wrote the following conclusions in his book “QED”:

“… Throughout this entire story there remains one especially unsatisfactory feature: the observed masses of the particles, m. there is no theory that adequately explains these numbers. We use the numbers in all our theories, but we don't understand them-what they are, or where they come from. I believe that from a fundamental point of view, this is a very interesting and serious problem.” (“QED” –Dr. Feynmann)
[BREAK]
Einstein, unaware of the relationship quantum-mass I've just revealed to you in this article, conceived photons to be nothing but “mass-less E-M energy behaving as a particle.” In a letter to Conrad Habicht written in the year 1905 there was a thought that troubled him greatly and still trouble every single physicist ever since:

“… That light transfer mass… this thought is both amusing and attractive; but whether or not the good Lord laughs at me concerning this notion and has led me around by the nose- that I cannot know.” (Albert Einstein, 1905).

Well, we know now that his “1905's mass-less” concept was wrong not because the Lord had him around by his nose, but because energy “needs” a proportional amount of dust to avoid a perfect vacuum… It was nothing personal after all.

Speaking of amusing… could you imagine that there are serious books today daring to state that gravity exert an attraction force over the “intrinsic mass” “particles” are supposed to own?

It's not a joke! A joke is that HUMONS keep building “particle accelerators” at a cost of $12 billions dollars a piece trying to find the smallest “crunch of matter” after each new collision. That would be fine if matter was really made out of “particles” as they have said many times, but it isn't. All they did was stimulating the fast absorption of high-energies by patterns of “standing nuclear waves” spinning around the core of atoms. The “zoo of particles” obtained were the logical result of a pre-modulation and scattering process in a frame of time-symmetry allowed by the vacuum.

What comes next is the trickiest thing of all! “The nature of time.”

Since this is a story, told by a sci-fi writer with no evidence of what he is saying other than the help he could get from your own intuition and common sense, I will ask you to use all your imagination and concentration in picturing what I'm about to say.

Time, in other words, the absolute elapsing rate of time across the atom is not uniform.

It changes from one harmonic to the next. The concept is difficult to grasp but it is essential in the understanding of puzzles you can't even imagine so far, so I beg you to do an effort and try to stay with me for a while.

Imagine a horse race. The center of the tracks would be the core of our atom, no big deal. The track closer to the core (horse number one) will run at a lower (absolute) speed than horse number two and so on. As in the weirdest scenario ever, you would be sitting in front of a bunch of horses running in different realities. More like a film made to run in different speed for each horse… too alien I guess!

Imagine this! For horse number four the one to its left (horse number three) was running at a lower-speed-reality while to its right (horse number five) was moving faster at an impossible-to-believe-speed. If you could talk to the man running on top of horse number four and asked him about his impressions, He would probably say that time was going backward for horse number three while otherwise time was moving forward for horse number five.

Inside of every single atom there is a “track for horse number four.” We call it “the center of mass.” The same place we located our “protons.” Everything between horse numbers three and one seems like moving in a perfect mirror image of horse's number five and six. Time looks like moving “backwards” although it moves forward too. It's all a matter of relativism. However, the actual passage of time is different, there was nothing purely relative about it at all. Time does change its elapsing speed as we move from one orbit to the next.

Now we can say that we have a better picture of the real atom that makes every piece of matter in my alternate universe.

Q. –“If protons, neutrons and electrons were patterns inside the atom with a magnitude of dust spinning around it in a complex time structure, how do you defined electrons “outside the atom then?”

A. Good question! We know that atoms have the ability to absorb radiation energy, transforming it (modulating it) into a different quantum and scattering it later. How that happened in our new atomic model? As soon as energy is being “absorbed” mass is instantaneously pushed to the outermost orbits of the atom once its presence is no longer required. As you may recall, the tiny specks of mass were necessary to fill the “blanks” left behind two canceling waves in space, with the new energy absorbed inside, mass was scattered back to the vacuum. Not for too long though! After the newly produced quantum leaves the atom to start traveling across space with the name of “photon” mass rush back into the spin “by express order given by the universe.”

The process of manufacture of an electron is somewhat more complicated than the case of a single photon since the presence of two or more atoms are required. Electrons “outside the atom” are also “modulated” by what you have called “atomic oscillators” in some books (my harmonics).

The tricky thing is that producing electrons require a “specific misalignment” and/or an uncompensated pattern at the outermost orbital of the atoms involved in those molecules.

The answer to the phenomenon called “tunneling” is lying inside this concept-model.

Worried about the “Cloud Chamber” (see Handbuch der Physik, vol.XLV,p.275, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg 1958) and the condensation path left behind by your “little particle”? Don't be professor! Help is on the way!

As I said, every single quantum traveling across different mediums “favors” thermal energy rather than mass to “fill the blanks” left behind during their propagation. During the entire propagation of the wave an electrical and a magnetic field keep spinning in an axis defined by its path.

Now! During the propagation mentioned above “interacting waves” cancel each other off leaving an instantaneous “hole” in the vacuum, a perfect and also a forbidden one by the law of universal density. However as fast as the canceling takes place the universe avoid such an “insult” by pushing thermal energy from the water vapor present inside the “Chamber.” That leads to a sudden fall of temperature right at the verge of the wave and the consequent discontinuous condensation into small water drops across the path of the quantum. The drops are the result of mass “sucked” into the vapor water to compensate for the thermal energy previously “absorbed” by the quantum (electron). The speed of this process is almost instantaneous compared with the speed thermal energy (heat) is able to “spread” across the vapor. That's why water was forced to condense. I bet you didn't know why vapor was condensed into droplets at contact. Unless you thought that electrons were cold… just kidding!

Why there was no dispersion at the entire quantum wave (your “particle”) once inside the “Cloud Chamber”? Because electrons, protons, neutrons and the rest of the quanta family behave like “solitons.” They resemble Russell's wave traveling across a canal near Edinburg that afternoon he saw it for the first time. The “feedback” pattern is different in each case according to the specific medium. The path of the electron you saw in the “Chamber” is exactly the same process of electrical charges across a wire. Inside the wire electrons are not “spread” either however they include a magnitude of mass in the process of propagation since “they have no other choice.” I guess you call them “Bloch Waves” now ever since you realized that the old theory of “particles” was becoming obsolete.

You must remember that thermal energy (heat) and mass are not “quantized” in nature. Their proportional magnitude inside the pattern of propagation of an energy-wave (quantum) depends on the medium, external conditions and interaction with the ether.

Phonons are proportional to the temperature of crystals, as we all know. Later on we'll see its roll in superconductivity.

I believe that we have given to you a “crash course” into the internal mechanics of the atom in my universe. Before I explain the mystery hidden in the two-slit experiment, I must talk a little bit about the force of gravity and its secret nature.
[BREAK]
Gravity, in my weird universe, is not the consequence of space-time “warped” by the sole presence of mass. In my universe gravity is a prerogative of stars. The sun of my planet (we call it Earth too) irradiate what we call “Gravitational Waves” that move planets around the star. Those affluent solar waves resemble trochoidal waves observed in ocean waves. The arrival of those huge waves to our “shores” (the surface of our planet) moves Earth and the other planets around the sun and moons around their home planets. Mass or matter as we know it is inert and do not exert any force of any kind on other bodies. Using some philosophy of sci-fi worlds, “Reality is the result of the rate of interaction between solar gravity waves and it is edited accordingly.”

Time however behaves at the scale of solar systems much like inside the atoms. The absolute elapsing rate of time in each planetarium orbit of our solar system is different from each other. One good reason why planets can't collide between each other and comets “ignore” the “huge space-time warped” we believe exist around “big masses.”

But let's go back to the topic of this article, “The Young's experiment.”

Using high energy-light the process could be depicted the following way:

A light-wave is projected across the two slits according to the set-up of the experiment. The physically existent light-wave travel across both slits, interacts with itself, and forms a spectrum in the screen. “Y” Or the controversially popular mathematical “life-saver” we call “wave-function” was no other than our (real) light wave. A quantum, gentlemen, is energy (a defined quantity I agree) but nothing more than energy. Energy obeys only one rule: “The law of conservation of itself.” That's it! It could go through two or hundred “holes or slits” as many as you wanted to open, but “at the end of the day” the multiple pieces “collapse” into one and the same quantum originally “split” in many pieces. If you are worry thinking about the mass of your little “particle,” don't! There is plenty in the vacuum to choose from, the universe takes care of it… I assure you that! Resuming: electromagnetic energy travels just as a regular light, it can disperse, refract, reflect and do all kind of vector calculation as it pleases.

But you already knew that, didn't you professor Sr.? The success of quantum mechanics in the experimental field (alone) started the day you “restored” your original “particles” to its rightful nature: energy.

Your nightmares also began the same day too. A world made of waves and at the same time of particles [that you are not willing to give up yet] is nothing but philosophically incoherent and scientifically delusional. You may keep “renormalizing” your equations and formulas as long as you please, canceling one infinite with another and approximating at your own conveniences… “One thing papers do is that they ‘agree' on everything you write on them.” That goes for this article too!

Pragmatism could still save them some time… Articles like this one however, no matter the level of fantasy or reality you may find in it, will make their time shorter!

That's why I found the “law of conservation of mass” nothing but a joke. It's just an image of the real one. They can't distinguish between the two… how could they?

Q-“Ok, but what about the defined pattern or spectrum? Nothing you had said so far explains it. We have shot one photon at a time and we still keep getting the same results… How about that?”

A. Right! What's missing here? Oh yes! The Ether!

The only reason a bunch of “cloned-photons” hit a different spot in the screen but still keeps the pattern of bright and dark fringes on the screen is due to the existence of the Ether. The interaction between those affluent gravitational waves from the sun coming to the Earth's surface and the mutual interaction with our light-wave determined the final position of the blotch on the screen; we are talking about two different scales interacting with each other. Without those “solar waves” responsible for gravity there would be no light at all. The needed “feedback” for our photon is guaranteed by those waves that are part of the vacuum we hardly understand anymore. Once the photon hits the screen the energy makes a lighting spot “collapsing” one fast-reality into our own. Remember Russell's “solitary waves”? Light or electrons are the water wave running across the “canal” that is represented in our story by the ether.

Now, my dear friend. Do you still consider necessary to repeat the same explanation using a dimmer light? Do you really think it would make a difference in our final arguments and conclusions? I didn't think so!

The reason of our uncertainty is given by the fact that humans don't understand the nature of the vacuum around them. They don't understand the relationship between mass and energy waves while propagating throughout space. Is light a particle? To answer that question I would have to ask you this: what is a particle according to you?

A quantum (specific magnitude of energy) with a defined magnitude of mass proportional to the rate of wave cancellation during its own propagation?

Is that “your particle” Sr.? I fail to see your point! We agree on the “bundle” of energy scattered from an atom during our exposition. Nobody has ever said that energy was a continuous “thing” with no end, at least in the last hundred years! Energy propagates in a wave-format and that's a fact. The propagation carries in itself the concept of moving energy in a permanent transformation, so mass must guarantee that process preventing the creation of a perfect vacuum. I apologize for my lack of vision on this subject, but where was your particle in all this? You can't even locate your electrons around your atom for God's sake; you can't detect the mass of a quantum between detectors for obvious reasons, so how could you expect me to believe that there is a “duality” and a paradox with respect to the conclusions of the experiment? Show me a “particle” that is not a result of confronting energies, dust filling the blanks inside a time-symmetry… Then I'll agree with you to “Shot up and calculate.”

If Einstein himself didn't rush to exile Maxwell's ether from our scientific literature in 1905 you wouldn't be embarrassed today over assumed incongruent conflicts between waves and particles. So stop arguing against human intuition, logic and common sense and let's do physics!
[BREAK]
I believe I finally came up with ways to demonstrate my point, after all:

We must set-up the “two slits experiment” once again but this time we must do it right!

If my predictions are correct we should see certain “anomalies” such as a “quantifiable displacement” of the spectrum of bright and dark bands to either side of the screen under the following conditions:

1) In the lapse of 24 hours and especially at sunrise and sunset.

2) Between the spectrums observed during the different phases of the moon.

3) Between those same spectrums taped on summer and winter respectively.

4) Also if we repeat the experiment under extreme pressure and temperature conditions other than room temperature. Because by changing the specific “free energy” or internal energy of the atoms involved in the generation of quanta (photons or electrons) components of the “emitter” will begin producing different conditions for “feedback” from the Ether altering the spectrum.

Tape it day and night! Keep the camera rolling all the time! Have a computer analyze the spectrum to the minimum detail! Look for variations or anomalies caused by the ether!

You want experimental evidences to support a logical and reasonable cause to justify the perfect pattern on the screen? I think that a “quack” just gave you the tip you were looking for…

You are welcome, professor, Sr.!

Of course, you can always have a choice. Forget everything I've said and continue your lectures about uncertainty and duality as if nothing had happened at all. You could even try to get time to go backwards too or so I've heard possible from some latest human theories, the problem is that nobody can “hide” the sun with a finger and people will start asking questions… Are you ready to give them the answers they deserved? Will you stop them from corroborating alien facts read in a tabloid or a sci-fi book? One last question if I may: What answers would you give to a student who personally verified that the spectrum observed in the “two slit experiment” was not a result of unknown uncertainties but ignored facts about the nature of the vacuum? Aha!

I'm convinced that inside the mystery of the “two slit experiment” hides the answer to build the theoretical principle that will open the future of space exploration: “My Time-Thrusters.” Ships that will travel almost as fast as light, time-insulation that will allow us to visit other systems without harm to ourselves. The knowledge of the vacuum will start with this observation… Don't you want to be a part of it or would you prefer someone else to take your place instead?

If my predictions are VERIFIED and stand to be CORRECT here on Earth too, you'll find easy to understand when I said that “The Standard Model” and the “Theory of Particles” are FLAWED. They were nothing more than a bunch of statistical quanta “artificially produced” by those collisions under a very narrow set of (ethereal) conditions. How we dare to assume those “particles” to be of universal nature? Nonsense! The same procedure in any other planet of this system will end up with a different set of “animals from a different Zoo.” Humans do not understand the nature of time and they don't waste time to demonstrate it… -Just, don't ask for more money to build “atom smashers” on Mars… please. The reason aliens fly around us but they can't land is because they are smarter than we are. They know the nature of time pretty well by now.

Are you still undecided? Let me give you a couple of hints stolen from alien books used by their teachers at high school:

Tip number one

How could you explain superconductivity in certain materials subject to extremely low temperatures?

By lowering the “internal thermodynamic energy” present in those atoms you are “forcing the universe” to take extreme measures by ordering mass to get its “ass” inside the pattern of “Standing Nuclear Waves” and change as a result the lattice structure. You could compare with a scanning tunneling microscope or other ways at your disposals that the final “visible mass” of the super-conducting material has increased at lower temperatures, could you explain it using your arguments?

An internal rearrangement in the structure of those couplings (molecular bonding as you know it) produced the right conditions for the rejection of external flux of magnetic fields, “The Meissner Effect.”

If under the new conditions more mass is now present in the atomic oscillator, we have raised its “modulating capacity” to a higher level, haven't we? We would be able then to “manufacture” two [entangled] twin electrons instead of just one… “The cooper pairs” see BCS theory.

Increasing the external pressure does the same results as lowering the temperature according to the laws of thermodynamics: making “mad” the universe and changing the magnitude of mass making it visible or invisible according to the established universal density. A pair of “entangled electrons” looks exactly like a “fat soliton” with a “center of mass.” The disappearance of thermal conduction is obvious by now. Restructuring the crystal eliminated every unnecessary misalignment in the coupling between atoms (molecular bonding). A sudden drop of electrical resistance at certain degree of temperature marks the point at which the inclusion of mass coincide with the exact capacity for manufacturing two electrons instead of just one and a bunch of extra photons (heat) and phonons that could be translated as energy wasted. Your quantized “phonons” professor were nothing more than the resulting thermal energy ‘modulated' inside harmonic patterns, they are the perfect evidence of the “manufacturing process” of electrons inside entangled molecular oscillators once external energy is applied to the system. Current, dear professor is the result of the flow of in-site manufactured energy-waves of electromagnetic nature (electrons) once mass and a very small quantity of heat got expelled from the same “oscillator.” Mass was expelled when external E-M energy was applied to the crystal from an external source. A super-conducting material exposed at very low temperatures replaced the thermal energy (your phonons) by mass (dust) duplicating the existent capacity of the entire “manufacturing process” from single electrons plus phonons into entangled twin electrons and zero or almost zero phonons.
[BREAK]
When you disrupted with a magnetic field the optimum coupling achieved by previously lowering the external temperature of the crystal, you were simply forcing the lattice to “open” new “oscillating capacities” across the conductor allowing mass from the vacuum into those [new] spinning patterns. It is like undoing the circumstances that allowed superconductivity but in reverse. If normally, heat takes part inside harmonics producing vibrations in the crystal as it is “modulated” by it causing the structure of the lattice to adopt certain configuration and the emission of phonons, now an applied magnetic field “has bent” those couplings into new oscillators. Only this time instead of heat, mass alone had to “fill the blanks” as a result of the spinning pattern. Remember that we haven't increased the temperature of the system yet.

The circulating E-M energy across the wire will find a leak toward the modulation of photons inside those new capacities and the pattern of electron pairs will be disrupted. (Meissner effect).

We have observed that the energy required to disrupt superconductivity is almost a match to that of the phonons, the missing energy [you can't find] is the tinny one spinning along with mass inside the atomic oscillators responsible for the in-site manufacturing of electrons.

If that resembles the BCS Theory awarded with the Noble Prize twenty years ago… I look like “superman.”

The same PRINCIPLE I've just explained to you could and must be applied to the theoretical analysis of 1-2-3 superconducting materials and others high temperature super-conductors.

Now, is it too difficult to understand or too difficult to admit… Which one is true?

This could be a subject to be answered by a 12 years old alien-kid in the 8th grade test.

Tip number two

LASER in my universe is not explained by the so-called “population inversion” of electrons jumping up and down either. The “population inversion theory” doesn't always work with every material. Even the resonance box used to keep a specific wavelength during emission is considered to be helpful but not indispensable. Some atoms have been observed to “mase” and “lase” almost spontaneously.

The phenomenon in my alternate universe was explained by a stimulated “collapse of entanglement” of scattered photons. Think of this! LASCE should be named instead of LASER.

Light Amplified by Stimulated Collapse of Entanglement.

What really happens is that an incoming photon forced the collapse with two or three (depending how levels or orbits was mass displaced by exciting energy) photons into one that is legitimate by the signature of the trigger photon. Those two, three or even four different photons previously scattered inside the resonator are “entangled” by nature. They could exist independently from each other but if we collapsed any of them using our original “laser photon” all of them would re-integrate into one almost instantaneously, producing a perfect cloned copy of the laser. If we keep them “trapped” into that “resonator box” the only outcome will be joining into one giving as a result a coherent light.

We didn't stimulate any emission whatsoever! The emission has taken place in its own natural way. We only forced to multiply the numbers of photons according to our conveniences by forcing our “sample” to collide with any of the member of the “entangled scattering.” In resume, we stimulated the conversion of light by collapsing the entanglement of its constituents.

Would that explanation sounds like the original one? Thank you!

In my world, we didn't have to use what you call “trial and error” to select the right materials for lasers. We understand the vacuum and we can determine what photons are considered “legitimate” which also means which ones are allowed to be scattered by a number of atomic orbits. The universe instantaneously does the selective process by “filtering” those quanta that will not match its signature with the solar waves. “Feedback” is an essential pre-condition in the final selection, if it is not present, the atom won't bother scattering a defect photon, and instead it will wait for the next lower orbit to be included in the process. That's the reason why some scattering takes longer to occur in some atoms like in phosphorus during phosphorescence. The time dilation is due to the different elapsing rate of time between orbits, as I've just explained earlier.

“A TIP WORTHY OF A NOBLE PRIZE?”

The photoelectric effect anticipated by Einstein in his 1905 papers could be used to prove the variable and non-intrinsic character of mass in matter. Pay attention to this one since its conclusions could qualify for the 2006 Noble Prize in theoretical physics.

We know that only a “quantized” magnitude of energy (photon) with sufficient energy could produce the “modulation” of electrons inside those correlated atomic oscillators in couplings (molecules).

I had explained to you earlier that if you lower the temperature of the crystal you also stimulate the inclusion of dust with the proportional extraction of heat.

I know you don't believe a word of what I'm saying, but according to my predictions as you start lowering the temperature of the system [at some point] you'll be able to cause the same electronic modulation (production of current) with higher energy photons otherwise transparent to the solid. It could only mean that we have increased the energy of the electron with the inclusion of dust into the atomic oscillator. An increased capacity of modulation of E-M energy will match the energy of our new photon allowing the flow of current [photoelectric effect]. I can't give you an exact information about specific details since HUMONS still ignore the roll of the vacuum in all this… Sorry!

OOPS! My ship is about to leave orbit. I've got to go back to my new galaxy now… these aliens are so logical!

It's been an honor having a closer look to your science. You know? Long time ago we were also pretty confused by that “duality thing” you are dealing today in your equations… It'll go away, believe me! We are pure energy inside, mass is just a tool to guarantee our existence in the universe. The only element in this entire universe that “fight for survival” and for its own conservation is called energy and we were made on its image with a little help of dust (you know… for the filling). Long ago we began to believe ourselves as made out of crunches of matter and a bunch of guys called reductionists spent a lot of time and resources trying to find the smallest piece of that crunch. It took millenniums to realize how wrong we were then.

I hope this little tip will make a difference. “To hell with the “prime directive!”

Your time is precious and I appreciate every second of it. Good luck with the experiment!

Yours truly

Miguel De Zayas (author)

To learn more about my alternate universe you may go to: www.humanbydefault.com

*You could read all about it today as a nice sci-fi story or wait about two hundred years to get it in the “2205 physics Journal” … it's up to you?

ã Copyright 2005

[mkirkpatrick]

HBD,it has been quite a while since you posted,and you have never as yet added to this
here thread,why is that my friend,I want to hear about these standing waves!


regards michael.