Alien Harmonics versus Quantum Mechanics

[humanbydefault]

“ALIEN HARMONICS versus QUANTUM MECHANICS”
(Article number two)

“It is your universe too you know? And no one has the right to replace its beautiful marble for an ugly wood.” [M. De Zayas-2005]

IN CHAPTER ONE titled “The Young Experiment” aliens revealed to HUMONS the secret behind the true origin of mass [m] in every single quantum of energy both stationary as in “particle in the box” and during its propagation, as in light or electrical currents. They also talk about the nature of reality and time as both concepts depended on the actual “rate of mutual interaction between confronting waves inside the boundaries of each harmonic.” It is precisely about harmonics, the same concept that gave the name to alien physics, what this article is about.

Harmonics are the kind of symmetry constantly present in our universe. From the very core of the atom [standing nuclear waves] into the next scale [electronic orbits] and continuing throughout molecular formation, their nature determines the particular scale of the same physical phenomenon: specks of radiation energy in a perpetual and mutual interference with the sole aim to survive… CONSERVATION.

The previous chapter was the introduction of alien science to HUMONS. We saw how the “Two Slit Experiment” had a simple and plausible explanation inside the “controversial” frames of human logic and common sense. We revealed the true nature of electrons as E-M energy in-site manufactured [modulated] into a new complex quantum inside “entangled atomic couplings” also known to HUMONS as molecular bonding. The subjects of superconductivity and laser, as you may remember, were seen before using a different prism, all in a rather simplistic and humorous context.

Today we are going to try to put some order into the messy world of “sub-atomic particles.” By the way, between you and me aliens call them “Bohrons.” You know Bohr + ons… Well, may be is not as funny for HUMONS as I previously thought… Sorry!

Anyway, HUMONS have divided their “particles” into two major groups: “Fermions” and “Bosons.” Then you have their sub-categories among we could find “Baryons” “Mesons” “Hadrons” “Pions” etc, etc, etc. If you recall from the first chapter, we learned from aliens that NO PARTICLES whatsoever spin inside atoms at all. All there was were nothing more than PATTERNS of high-energy [standing nuclear waves] that because of their mutual nature of interaction they constantly cancelled each other off creating the possibility of a “perfect vacuum,” avoided only by the inclusion of mass (dust) into the patterns from the vacuum… This is all history and it was in “black and white” so you don’t forget about it.

“Fermions” to the best of their alien understanding could be “translated” as those harmonic patterns spinning around the atomic core of energies. But also “electrons outside the atoms” are thought to be “fermions” too and the reason couldn’t be simpler: because they are the result of a complex modulation [manufacture] inside entangled couplings… “The humon’s spin thing…” “Bosons” on the other hand, are like “photons” which as we all know are the result of an “absorption-modulation-scattering “ process taking place inside non-entangled harmonics. This is a fundamental concept and you should take it into consideration in every single analysis you’ll make in the future, in the case you decided one day to take into serious consideration my arguments… You never know! As I mentioned right at the very introduction of this article, harmonics and their couplings are present between molecular bonding and also inside atomic nuclei at deeper levels of “standing nuclear waves.” If we were to make an analogy using nothing but “electronic orbits” we could say that “neutrons” share the same picture observed in the ground state [exactly just like two electrons in the first sub-shell].

Here comes another secret! “Every time you consider the presence of two “electrons” (or as many as it takes) fulfilling entirely [with both spins] a sub-shell, you are witnessing the “space-projection” or “spreading-spectrum” of a set of harmonics corresponding to the presence of “neutrons” in a nucleus of an atom.” In two words: complete harmonics belong to the resonance of “neutrons alone.” As we will see later on, “protons” bond to each other creating a neutron-pattern that “neutralize” the presence of incomplete electron sub-shells. The key to unveil this puzzle hides in the fact that two “protons” never occupy the same orbital. The same arrangement seen in electron occupancy across the orbital is “copied” from their “parents” inside the nucleus. Protons however will resemble the model of an isolated atom of hydrogen with one electron in its first shell and capacity left in the harmonic to hold another quantum in it. Did you get the idea? What I’m saying is that the actual formation of a proton-pattern inside the structure of interacting quark-patterns will produce a series or set of harmonics in higher levels of energy bringing one electron orbit into the final picture, that’s why we observe an equivalence one proton-one electron vacancy in atoms. Neutrons, as the name suggested, are nothing more than a “neutralization process” of asymmetry into a symmetrical configuration, a perfect match between energy and harmonic capacity, just like in the case of two “electrons” in the ground state.

When all the energy [optimum capacity] is present inside a given harmonic at the level of two or more “quark-bonding” a neutron is born. It is so funny when we listen to HUMONS talking about the possibility of “proton decay” in X number of millenniums. The decay of a neutron is no different that a molecular disassociation of the chemical bond between two atoms really, of course at a different scale. How come you have never seen an electron orbit suffering from decay? Think about it! It may sound weird but it is exactly the same nature of analogy. I have mentioned “quarks” for the first time and I’ll explain to you why. The symmetrical harmonic patterns of an atom could take us further into levels we couldn’t even imagine today. HUMONS and aliens are convinced that our progress and present technology does not depend in how far deep we could get in the understanding of such puzzle. No energy in the entire universe could be strong enough to probe those distances and particularly HUMONS know it. The frontier between philosophy and physics should be defined at this point in science. There are limits to what our resources and ways to observe and measure things could go… Money, my good friend, is an entirely different consideration when they talk about building more capacities for colliding “particles,” so I left this issue to the final conclusion.

[BREAK]

The problem is that HUMONS have a particle theory to demonstrate a duality to impose on every one and an obsession to adjust reality to mathematical equations instead of the other way around… I don’t know how to call it…stubbornness? Back to physics! Now let’s talk about MASS. The difference of mass observed between “Bohrons” is due to the logical presence or absence of a “center of mass.” A quantum of E-M energy [an electron outside the atom for example] is the result of previously absorbed energy, manufactured inside ENTANGLED COUPLINGS eventually propagating from one “molecular oscillator” to the next. That feature gives them the appearance of a “particle” while kind of “holding” a tiny magnitude of mass during its propagation. “Photons” on the other hand, were the result of the same process but inside non-entangled oscillators [atomic oscillators].

Don’t you think it is boring keep talking about “electrons inside the atom” and “electrons outside the atom”? I agree! It is to me! But you forced me to do so.

THERE ARE NEITHER ELECTRON INSIDE THE ATOMS NOR OTHER PARTICLES FOR THAT MATTER!

Can’t you see that professor?

The spinning mass present inside entangled couplings [molecular bonding] is the exact match of the magnitude of E-M energy an electron will HOLD once it is scattered from them. That is the reason why electrons [at conduction levels] have the same mass. You see, professor: Your leptons get the observed mass while avoiding a perfect vacuum spinning electromagnetic fields tend to produce while propagating throughout the vacuum. The same principle stands to “neutrons outside the atom,” “protons outside the atom” and the rest of the “damned ZOO outside the atom” too… excuse me!

You have to understand that there is a build-up of energies using nothing more than the pattern of “standing waves” from the very core of the atoms to molecular structures forming the matter we see in the macro-world. Every attempt to make a CHART of “particles” thought to be glued one another is just a waste of time. The famous glue thought to be your “messenger particles” are [according to aliens] the scattered energy from “non-entangled harmonics” located in the way out to the outermost shells, making out for the energetic difference between different scales. My good Lord! It couldn’t be simpler!

If we were to borrow the same elevator used by professor Brian Green in his documentary film titled “The Elegant Universe,” we would descend throughout overlapping sets of harmonics spinning all over with dust. As we approach the core, the intensity of the energy around us would increase rapidly to the same point it was at the time of the Big Bang. To our greatest surprise, at true “ground zero” we would discover that our atom was built by a collective assembly of groups of two infinitesimally tiny specks of radiation interacting with each other in a pattern of interference. Once we start ascending back to the surface, we would see how energy is being properly saved and stored inside each new harmonic.

Think of this! HUMONS call them ISOMERS and they are described as “excited states of the same type of nucleus.” This is how our two initial specks of radiation energy managed to hide their energy from “annihilation” which also means to them final dissipation. “Molecules” are formed at deeper levels just as they are in electronic orbits around the nucleus [it’s called universal symmetry], But the marvelous thing of all is the principle that rules those nuclear bonding. Why do you think the table of elements has 8 groups? MUSIC! It’s not about the 8 rightful ways Buddhists used in their path to Nirvana… Dr. Murray Gellmann! The key to understand [if HUMONS will ever understand the nature of the objective reality they live in] all, why organic matter functions and reacts with the environment and the very secret of life itself, finds its roots in the knowledge of the internal mechanics of harmonics.

As long as HUMONS keep reciting phrases like “The role of “neutrons” is to reduce the electrostatic repulsion between two “protons” and that the stability of atoms depends on their presence inside the nucleus they are like a poor “fish dead in the water.” Or what’s worse: “The JOKE of the entire universe.” Neutrons, dear professor, are the marvelous solution energy found to save its reserves while creating new couplings. Those new [neutral] coupling are a perfect match “energy-harmonic capacity” for what they are observed to be electrically “indifferent.”

Ready for another secret?

Those “new harmonics,” interpreted as “particles” and the same ones you have called “neutrons” before, are “spread” across space in octaves too just like the ones produced by “protons.” We know that they do not make much of a difference in the chemistry of isotopes, but their unknown existence [until the writing of this article] is responsible for those “vibrational modes” changes and special kinetic properties of isotopes in contrast to “simpler atoms.” In plain English it means that those “invisible” spinning patterns of perfect match energy-harmonic capacity include an extra mass [sort of a barrier against heat] located between sub-shells you already plotted in your “quantum mechanically based” arguments. They fill the “gaps” you talk about when referring to the “Fermi level” and the “Fermi energy.”

Be honest for a second! When you talk about the “electrons” you assumed spinning in X sub-shell of X atom [doesn’t matter which one] have you ever consider them to be “in an excited state?”

No, you don’t! You believe that there is an electrical balance achieved between “protons” and “electrons” and that state is stable… as long as the atom does not suffer from an unexpected decay, of course!

[BREAK]

ISOMERS are in their own scale as stable as isotopes are. Some are “short-lived” but others could stay among us for years, isn’t it true professor?

Can’t you see symmetry involved in all this from the very core of the atom to the very bond of your molecule?

The point is that when we try to “simplify” and “reduced” our scale of analysis to what we are allowed to “see” and ignore everything else we can't see we could be missing THE POINT.

In ISOTOPOLOGUES molecules behave differently: physical and chemical properties are subjected to variations and the fact of the matter is that HUMONS can't literally explain those phenomena either without the proper understanding of the effect produced by those “neutral harmonics” emitting their resonance from “neutrons.”

Protons are patterns just like neutrons are but each one has their own independent [energetic] origin and its own extra energy that makes it electrically active.

How many times have you encountered a “neutronless” two-proton atom? Never!

It is even more unlikely that it is to find two hydrogen atoms in a single state “unwilling” to form a molecule standing one next to the other. In the case of “protons,” the bonding energy is several times bigger.

“Protons” are not fighting to get a “divorce” from each other! On the contrary! They got fused together in an attempt to survive! They reduced their net energy and saved great part of it by “bonding” to another “proton.” However the structure of the orbital for “protons” also has a quantized nature, just like we saw in the case for electrons.

Resuming I would say that you could make a direct analogy between the structure of “protons” and “neutrons” inside the atomic nucleus using the same pattern of electron-occupancy in electron shells.

Corresponding a direct proportionality between the number of complete sub-shells with the actual number of “neutrons” and the same way with incomplete electron sub-shells in the case of “protons.” There will be some controversial differences between my previous statement and your present spectroscopic order, but as I said before, you are omitting “neutral harmonics” somehow “invisible” to you because of their “low-energy” configuration… [Instrumentation problem I guess] No offense! But they are primitive compared with the ones employed by aliens today… Nothing personal I assure you that!

Then, HUMONS see themselves in trouble once again trying to understand the existence of a capricious and inopportune “overlapping” between sub-shells in electronic orbital.

If everything just went smoothly for a while…! –They prayed. The “Pauli exclusion principle” worked fine with hydrogen, so what did we do wrong in our lives to deserve such an annoying situation? –Complaint physicists at once.

To understand the “overlapping thing” you need to comprehend that those electronic shells are an “echo” more like a reverberant resonance and a product of the nuclear configuration of yet deeper patterns of interference between primary energy specks of radiation.

Stop blaming an abnormal increasing of the electromagnetic force “exerted” by “protons” in an effort to bring electrons [along with their sub-shells] closer to the nucleus!

Aliens called it “The accordion syndrome.” Trying to explain why atoms keep themselves in a “short leach” by playing back and forward with the “positive” electromagnetic force and the “wave function” sounds really pathetic.

With all due respect, professor, but this is not what you lecture in your conferences, do you?

It is precisely that bonding solution between protons what brings to life “neutrons.”

There are many other intermediate harmonic patterns spinning between “protons” and “electrons” and those are multiple octaves or “far harmonics” from internal and deeper “particles” still undiscovered by HUMONS. Once you start “bombarding” those patterns with your “accelerated quanta” you begin to “produce” a bunch of new “particles” today part of your vast collection of ghosts.

Honestly? HUMONS need a new theory. One that would include a global analysis of harmonic structures

Built from the inside out, instead of trying to “glue” different scales and dividing the same energy in a bunch of forces.

Yes, Sr.! We are thinking about the same thing right now… It's just in front of your eyes. Now that you have the picture described in words, you could “do your thing” and rewrite it into mathematical equations.

Or… You could scream about mathematics, transformations, equations, tensors and matrix all you want. It's useless… since inside your hart… you know I'm right!

If one day you'll plan to give an answer to the puzzle concerning anomalies observed in atoms like chromium while trying to “fill their shells” with “electrons” I think you should look at the complex harmonic configuration of energies building their way up from the atomic core to the vacuum.

Don't try to justify a theoretical “divorce” between what's going on inside the core of the atom and the electronic orbital… it's not going to work!

In fact, you have already seen how an atom changes from one element to the next after a simple decay process. Couldn't this simple fact be a final evidence of a sense of continuity between superimposed patterns of harmonics, instead of a chaotic and casual rearrangement of independent “particles”? Couldn't it professor?

Of course, admitting that “electrons” are in fact quanta manufactured inside entangled atomic couplings from incoming external E-M energy could be a dangerous business… That could take away the “particle status” given to them by Dr. Thompson hundred years ago. That would also re-open a window into a sort of theoretical revision inside the very fundaments upon which many Noble Prize in physics have been awarded all these years… an ugly perspective indeed.

[BREAK]

Changing subjects, I think we should talk about “tunneling” and how aliens have explained that process.

Assuming that you could admit electrons to be nothing more than entangled modulation of a quantum of E-M energy. I would say that, as far as the sum of coupling present inside the “barrier” makes the total mass equivalent to that of one electron-mass, the quantum [electron] would find its way out to the other side.

The propagation across the internal structure of the “barrier” will take place independently of the actual dimensions of it. In my first article I mentioned that a misalignment of atomic couplings as a result of impurities present inside the crystal or also hydrogen bonds could add up to the final product. It's like making one piece from scratches of many others. Allow me to quote a thought about tunneling:

“We can picture the build-up of charge on the surface of the electrode as being similar to the formation of a water droplet on a leaky tap. The droplet increases until it reaches a critical size, at which point it breaks away from the tap and a new droplet starts to form…” Dr. Konstantin Likharev.

Q- is it a coincidence, professor, that when a “neutron” suffer from a decay you observe (1) a mass equivalent to one electron and (2) an extra energy equivalent to a neutrino?

Q- is it another coincidence that in the next scale (molecular) the same pattern will be repeated in order to manufacture an electron?

Q- is it then a “miracle” that in the next scale (octave) our familiar pattern of one electron-mass will reappear (spread out) inside a crystal supplying the right conditions to an eventual modulation of energy into one electron?

And allow me to include a last question here:

Q- isn't the universe trying to tell us something with a repetitive symmetry across those patterns of “standing nuclear waves” extending the same “model” throughout molecules and crystals as well?

E-M energy runs across crystals as water does. Once the total energy equals that of one electron it initiate its propagation from one coupling to the next until it finds itself on the other side of the barrier.

I used in my book the analogy of “Dr. Jekill” in the case of harmonic patterns where “electrons” are manufactured and its counterpart “Mr. Hyde” for “electrons outside the atom.” -sort of a double personality.

One last thought before concluding this article.

Physicists seemed to avoid profound discussions well into the field of philosophy… I guess they have their personal motives in doing so. Especially in these days when human logic and common sense have become increasingly inconvenient to carry on with during the assimilation of a reality, described rather by mathematical equations than by pure physical arguments.

The “implicate world” in Bohm's analogy could only be interpreted in the way I have brought to you in essence. Whether you are willing to consider the “Occam's razor” or any other path while trying to finally make up your mind ADMITING that the concept of “particle” is “anchoring” humankind to a “Stone Age,” I suggest you hurry up because the clock is ticking.

I must also warn you about the consequences such behavior could bring upon future generations of physicists. History accounts how Bohr, Schrodinger, Pauli and Gellmann to mention just a few were deeply affected by absurd interpretations regarding our own reality and existence imported from quantum mechanics and its uncertain nature. They felt lost. They were in fact LOST.

I think HUMONS should consider this issue and its negative implications before making a final decision whether to continue with today's false image of our universe or accept these friendly alien teachings… What do you personally think professor? They are free you know?

Speaking of the devil:

There is of course the question of MONEY. I think I captured the idea in my next quote:

“Give me an underground laboratory, half a dozen atom-smashers, and a beautiful girl in a diaphanous veil waiting to be turned into a chimpanzee, and I care not who writes the nation's laws.” [S.J. Perelman in his 1958 book].

I think I know why it is so crucial to keep the present status of “particleness” instead of assuming a more realistic model… Every one needs to pay bills these days… right?

OOPS! The aliens are calling me again! I've got to go now. They want to see the mission of the shuttle “Discovery” from outer space. It's kind of a nostalgic feeling I guess!

Think about it! … Don't tell me, I know you will!

If your HUMON status was still unaffected with my second article, I'll tell you another secret:

I'll never give up! I'll keep writing about this until someone will listen to me. Like in the movie “Fields of dreams” –“People will come…!” I know they will come to their senses and the truth will finally be heard.

Sincerely

M. De Zayas [author] -As always, you are invited to go to: www.humanbydefault.com

See you in the dark side of the moon!
Copyright 2005