Living in the Stone-Age of Humanity: The Year 2005
The Planet of HUMONS (Part Three)
Published by humanbydefault
08-31-2005
| | Introduction
“LIVING IN THE STONE-AGE OF HUMANITY: THE YEAR 2005” (Article number three)
I’m going to introduce this article with a brief analogy of my own inspiration, maybe this way I could succeed in transmitting a clear picture of what HUMONS are achieving with those “particle collisions” taking place in sophisticated installations around the whole planet.
“In my story a violinist plays his musical instrument while performing a beautiful piece. Music, composed by musical notes and these ones by tones and their harmonics begin to “fill the air” with an enchanting melody…” I would stop right here to ask you a few questions that will appear to you that I just went crazy:- What would you think if I asked you to believe me when I say that those tones known as “natural sounds” and their harmonics or sub-harmonics were independent physical entities “attracted to one another” because of an assumed existence of a “force” I decided to call it “Electro-musical” force?
- Would I look like a “maniac” to you if I decided to calculate a “gap” between harmonics of the same accord distributing them in a pattern called (let’s say…) “musical levels”?
- Would I be closer to be called a madman if I decided to sub-divide those naturally entangled harmonics in two groups, musically “positive” and “negative” just to put an example?
Of course you know what I getting with this seemingly absurd analogy, don’t you professor?
If the violin of my story were considered to be an atom, naturally every time that we “play” a note while passing a bow on top of its strings we were [according to you] “scattering” parts of the violin too into the vacuum. In this case I guess I should call those notes “sub-violin particles”!
There is not a big difference between my analogy and the way you are interpreting the entire phenomenon. An atom is a collection of patterns of energy interference built-up from its very core to its outermost patterns also called orbital. The distribution of energy vary according to the scale [musical scale or atomic scale] of the analysis.
Mass and I hope I was very clear in this point before, was “sucked” from the vacuum into the patterns avoiding the opening of a “perfect and forbidden vacuum.” By the way, the speed of the process in which the universe forces dust to fill the blanks left behind wave cancellations is FASTER THAN LIGHT. I know… another thing HUMONS have to “accept as a leap of faith.” Probably it would be too much to ask from you guys at this point in time… What a heck! I did my best.
I’m really sorry to spoil your “party” at this point in time but the conceptual differences between “anti-matter” and “matter” are being mathematically and physically misunderstood. Considering my atomic model, at least for a while, hypothetically correct. I would think that a highly energetic quantum made to collide against a “normal” atom would supply some energy into deeper patterns [quarks or other far deeper ones] responsible for the existence of “proton-harmonics” in subsequent scales. Remember the “hole-electron” phenomenon in semiconductors? We could assume that a one-electron harmonic (as in the case of gallium doped into silicon wafers) located in a lower “valence band,” below the so-called “conduction band,” will under certain conditions absorb E-M energy. As we had said earlier, the optimum conditions to manufacture one electron are being given by the fact that the mass equivalent to one electron must be present at such lower level too. Think about it! What are positrons? Well, they are the mirror image of electrons… everybody knows that! Same mass? Yes! Same opposite charge? Yes! How about energy? That’s it! The internal energy of a positron is much higher in density that the one found inside electrons. Positrons as we all know have been “produced” inside deeper patterns of the nucleus. Using my language: in lower sub-harmonics. If we considered “protons” to be the “mirror glass” between two worlds, every single particle produced behind that limit would then be consider as an “anti-particle.”
What I find so incredibly smart is the use of an equal magnitude of mass in the making of matter across the entire creation!
I know it sounds ludicrous and probably stupid to you now but give me a minute and allow me explain it to you the best way I can. The “sub-atomic particles” you believe exist in different sizes and weights are the fruit of the same pattern of intertwined harmonics or musically arranged levels of energy, from pure radiation to lower levels. One constant however is the present of one-electron mass in every single one of them. How come there are so many different types of “particles” after all? |  Contents | | |
Latest 5 articles | | |
Article Tools | | |
Featured Articles | | | |  | | | | | | |  A thought will outrun light,no contest.
re,living in the stoneage of humanity,humanbydefault.found your article interesting,harmonics,a ,universalsymphony,music is as you no doubt a form
of light,and all musical tones,and subtones,have a respective colour assigned
to them,by the universal law of harmoneys.
with regards light,thought is faster than light,by its very nature linked into and
part of the living aether,an electrical living fluid,instantanously,and automatically
cancel out time and space,as though they dont exist,which of course will
one day prove to be absolutely so.therefore one could be in telepathic communication with another person instantly,whether they be next door
or at the other end of the universe,I remember that n.a.s.a. and the russian
equivelent,were conducting tests with telepathy,witha view to deep space
travel,and the need to keep in touch,without long delays.
also the remote viewing program,which was sposored by the C.I.A.and written
about by Ingo Swann,looked at instantanious communication.Thought.
kind regards.michael. | | | | | Quote: Why is this so crucial in our analysis? Simply because an entanglement or coupling will “produce” or “modulate” a quantum with “two realities” spinning around a center of mass!
Yes, Sr.! Imagine an onion for a second! Let’s assume for a moment that a layer with X magnitude of energy inside a given reality would be wrapped into another layer with different energy and rate of reality. A hybrid would then be borne with one thing in common: the energy and the mass of one-electron. Of course, we are assuming all that based in what I’ve just said a moment ago about the symmetry of every particle with respect to the condition of their own origin. |
So you are suggesting that each atom exists within its own reality, which is then coupled with other realities and it interacts with other atomic entities?
This is an interesting idea. It reminds me of the idea of a single particle in existence for the entire universe, which keeps zipping backwards and forwards in time. Thus, the atom which makes up my fingernail is the same atom which makes up the edge of the cloud which is the same atom that makes up the ring of Saturn. (For simplicity, we assume that this atom can "transform" from proton to neutron and so forth").
This then means that your single atom, interacting with the other atom through the atomic bond- is interacting with itself in an alternate plane of existence (another time line for that same atom)
With regards to the symmetry of every particle with respect to its origin- if they are all the same particle, then they are all perfectly symmetric. The question then might become instead- if a particle has traversed the entire universe life span, and now is beginning again, where does it end up? For the same particle existing over and over would not necessarily have spatial symmetry with respect to the traversing of the universe time line. That is to say, it is not necessasarily true that the atom would walk through all atomic positions in a linear, or regular, way, like an assembly line worker knocking off pieces of furniture. It might though.
So if we imagine this particle walking through all possible realities, then the points at which it interacts with itself through chemical or atomic bonds are the points where these realities intersect and are merged into one.
| | | | | what produces the spin?
It would appear that we talk about atoms and energy spinning,this spins,and that spins,but what is the Real purpose of all this spinning motion,and whathas the vortex to do with all of this?Any ideas folks!
kind regards michael. | | | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Article Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode | 
Posting Rules
| You may not post new articles You may not post comments You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com | |
