Popcorn Literature”…? Not Any More

[humanbydefault]

“POPCORN LITERATURE”…? NOT ANY MORE!

(Article number four)

“Alternative science will earn its place in literature just as sci-fi did in the past” [M. De Zayas]

I met an alien once… It was as if just for a short while, all the common sense left in the entire world suddenly materialized right on front of me. It was a unique experience I'll never forget.

Anyway, this humanoid introduced himself as a “famous” sci-fi writer back in his own galaxy. He was looking for scientific inspiration among human physicists, some new “insides” [the way he diplomatically put it] into the complex world of human knowledge. It didn't take long for him to realize the degree of chaos not to mention a theoretical vacuum embedded in our concept of reality and the body of science designed to keep it afloat.

I showed him first a couple of books on quantum mechanics to see his reactions and all I've got was a long and noisy alien laugh. I recall the special intonation he used while repeating, almost whispering to himself, the same words over and over again:

“ Particles… Observer… measurements…” Then he turned to me and asked me to sing and whistle any human melody at the same time. I tried to sing it but he stopped me. Then I tried to whistle it and he stopped me again. –“I said at the same time!” “The alien replied with some authority” I can't! “I said”

If you can't perform both tasks at the same time how could you expect anyone to measure the position and the momentum of a “sub-atomic particle” at the same time?

“What are you talking about?” “I exclaimed,” “Are you drunk?”

“Lips” “You need to use your lips to sing and to whistle and that makes the simultaneity of both actions impossible, right or wrong?” “I agreed… I guess he's right”

“Melody goes through your lips using nothing but your breath, right? Right! If I “collapsed” the movement of your lips what would happen to the melody?” “I think it will stop.” “I answered it not convinced yet to where he was heading…”

“There you go! Your breath is “modulated” by the changing shape of your lips, which also means that each tune of your whistling or word of your song is composed by air and vibrations”

“Now! Vibrations interact with the air around you producing the perfect condition for its eventual propagation. This is very elemental for both of us since aliens love music as much as you do and know how to whistle too.”

“Imagine that your lips were the wave-format or wave-pattern which ever one you decide it. (Anything but “wave function” please!) Energy moved your breath across your vocal cords and air was plain and simple mass. In my analogy every single element is connected to one another. Without lips energy couldn't modulate a single word or a tune out of simple air coming from your lungs. Without energy no melody would exist at all and without air (mass) no vibration could find its medium of propagation.”

“Of course! All this is a wild analogy with no scientific basis whatsoever but the point of my story remains the same: Energy propagates across space in waves. Every single quantum of energy finds its origin in a modulation inside atomic harmonics [lips]. Bosons as photons of light will always be the result of the internal modulation of (supplied external) energy inside “non-entangled harmonics” as in the case of the spectrum observed in hydrogen atoms. Fermions as in electrons, just as I said earlier in one of my articles, were the product of (supplied external) E-M energy modulated into an entirely new quantum inside “entangled couplings” as in the case of molecules in crystals. The first, as Einstein referred to in a letter once, “transfer” some mass [dust] while it propagates across space. Actually mass was not “carried on” within the photon, but interacted in and out as the wave goes, never leaving the area. Electrons on the other hand are complex quanta of energy since they carry along with the wave a tiny “center of mass.” Since electrons are produced inside two “entangled couplings” or molecular bonds between atoms of the lattice their energy spins around a common “center of mass” created by the energy-differential of two interacting harmonics.

If hypothetically speaking, there was a reality where particles were an integral part of it even assuming a simultaneous wave behavior of them how could you account for the results on your “Two Slit Experiment?”

“If an electron was in fact a particle [as humans proclaimed] how could a particle would split to go through both slit at the same time? Isn't a lepton the smallest particle there was?”

“How could you account for the existence of a particle during the propagation of an electron across space?”

“How could you physically imagine inside your mind the concept of spin?”

I know that they actually refer to the magnetic field created by the electron during its angular momentum around the atom, but it doesn't make any sense to accept that two electrons will present opposite spins being both leptons, which also means that they are “exactly looking particles.”

[BREAK]

“Would that mean that spin is not an inherent property of the electron but a condition acquired “ a posteriori” depending on the final position inside its own orbital?”

“Would that also mean [according to you] that in the case exciting energy was supplied electrons will also be able to “jump” up and down between orbital or sub-shells automatically changing their spin up and down at their own convenience?”

One last question: “If photons were conceived [by absolute unanimity] as energy re-modulated inside atomic oscillators why would be that alien to accept the thought that electrons share the same origin as their “primitive cousins?”

I could keep asking you questions you can't answer under the scope of quantum mechanics and the reason couldn't be simpler: “Because quantum mechanics wasn't design to described reality but to predict experimental results based in wave mechanics.”

Quantum mechanics is unable to give an answer to why the mass of the particles, why the presence of a pattern resembling standing waves known as “The Pauli exclusion principle.” Why so many different particles inside an atom that despite their differences still present some common patterns to account for.

There is a fundamental difference between observing a phenomenon, assigning it a name and describing it as it is observed versus simply offering a physical explanation of its cause. A “why” demands a “because” and that is missing in quantum mechanics… No offense!

You teach your students to learn how to fill with electrons each sub-shell starting from the so-called “ground state” up to the top. The whole thing is so incredibly absurd that even aliens found trouble understanding the point in all this.

Let me try to picture my point with an easy to understand analogy before you thought that I was drunk too.

Tell me honestly, what would you think of me if I taught you to draw the human voice spectrum from the outside to the inside? Or first the leaves and later the tree, or may be the fingers of a human hand and finally the palm… Wait! Don't tell me! I can guess!

Those quanta of E-M energy we saw propagating as electric current across wires were in fact produced inside molecular bonds between atoms. An individual atom does not posses electrons the way you know them in your lab observations. The other thing is that those spinning harmonics you thought to be your electrons were nothing more than spatial projections of the same pattern of a higher energy sitting inside the very core of the atom as I explained in one of my previous articles before.

OK! Let's assume for a moment that in the specific case of electrons “outside the atom” the quantum of E-M energy looks 100% like a real particle. I must admit that accepting the idea that mass would share with energy the same wave getting in and out from the vacuum at a speed faster than the speed of light could be a little “sensitive” judged by human standards… I can see that!

If on top of that you hear from a guy like me that mass or dust was inert [incapable of holding electrical charges of any kind] and its solely roll in this universe was to “fill the blanks” left behind canceling waves, I could understand your intentions about committing suicide… Just kidding!

Isn't it interesting? Our greatest minds imagined matter as a bunch of little particles they called atoms. Everything we built since then was resting on top of that assumption. Hundred years ago a new theory called quantum mechanics took everyone by surprise while announcing that those particles we thought to be part of everything and everyone were also behaving as energy does, as waves.

Aliens are simply saying that the observation of matter as it exists around us is the result of our own limitations. Neither aliens nor we will ever be able of demonstrating the process of interaction between dust and energy in the making of matter. We take for granted the existence of matter in the universe since we can't actually see how energy depends on mass to interact with itself at a speed faster than light.

So, back to the nature of electrons… “I could understand the human obsession for calling them particles. However, if hypothetically speaking we accepted that electrons were in fact independent specks of matter owing a specific magnitude of electric charge, just as the way protons were but with opposite charge, what would be then the situation “inside the atom”?”

Correct me if I'm wrong but according to human theories there were also electrons and protons inside the atom too. You could stop reading this article at any moment and verify my conclusions in any scientific encyclopedia if you feel it's necessary… I personally recommend “wikipedia” in the Internet; it's my favorite and it is faster.

So, according to humans and humans only, you could assume the existence of both protons and electrons inside the atom as merely casual, non-related and strictly based on their mutual attraction… Right or wrong?

Casual: Because the fact that protons, neutrons and electrons were considered as independent particles they found themselves together inside the atom by pure chance rather than a “progressive harmonic pattern” irradiated from the very core of it, as I have officially said for the 57th time with this one.

Non-related: Since electrons are not seen as “harmonic projections” of protons and these ones by the same token as a deeper “harmonic projection” of still undiscovered “particles.”

Mutual interaction: Electrons, like in a fantastic tale, are assumed to spin around protons based on the action of the so-called “electromagnetic force.” It is true that energy spinning at proton-levels is denser and higher than the one at electron harmonics [since one is the octave of the other], but stating that between those two patterns existed an electric attraction in charge of keeping them together in an orbit was just hilarious.

[BREAK]

In addition to that, I could add [according to humans] that the same electrons we observe moving across a wire or an electrical conductor are the same ones spinning around the nucleus of the atom… Am I being truthful? Again, check it out if you feel confused!

For humans an atom is just a bunch of luckily glued particles of difference sizes by the mysterious help of disconnected forces from which they have absolute no clue where they came from or what they are… I know I've got it right with the description but don't bother! You won't find it on wikipedia at least not spelled the same way… I guarantee it!

There you are! Aliens do not share those theories and if you happen to read my articles on the Internet you would probably know by now what I'm talking about. You could go to www.toequest.com and access all of them under the sign of “humanbydefault.” I appreciate the interest Robert and his friends have kindly shown in making available to the entire forum. The fact that you may not share the same opinion with someone doesn't necessarily mean that you should diminish his or her small contribution; I know that these guys practice the meaning of the word respect… [Something sorry to say, not too common these days.]

Aliens are crystal clear with respect to the concept of “local” and “non-local” referring to physical phenomena. “Entanglement is locality” if and only if we understand locality to be conditioned by the boundaries that limit the confinements of our entire universe.

Two entangled photons traveling with opposite directions across space are in no violation of the laws imposed by the universe on them. In fact, the reasons for their “independent existence” are conditioned by the actual existence of both at the same time. In the conclusions concerning the results of the EPR experiment Einstein mentioned the existence of a “spooky force at a distance.” He believed that an action applied on one photon would sort of “transmit” a signal or force to the other photon as well. Those aware of the disastrous end of Einstein's final attempts to prove quantum mechanics as a sort of statistical collection of experimental conclusions found forever lost the chances of beating quantum mechanics and its arrogant uncertainties. It was a painful chapter in the history of science indeed

Bell's theorem and its conclusions, not entirely accepted by 100% of the physics community I may add, are a convincing evidence of the speed of action of the universe in response to any possible violation of its rules.

But what is entanglement? We had said that an electron is a legitimate example of entanglement.

E-M energy modulated in two different entangled harmonics. In superconductivity two electrons are being modulated inside entangled couplings once its capacity for electronic modulation was duplicated in response to a substantial decrease of temperature.

Two photons are also entangled if the total mass of the atomic oscillators [harmonics] where their energy modulation took place was equal to one-electron mass.

“Collapsing” one photon would force the second to “agree” with the sacred rule: instantaneous absorption of nearby energy to avoid a serious energy violation. Needless to say that such fast absorption of energy will take place at a faster than light (FTL) speed. Are we ever going to be able to observe such an action in our instruments? Forget about it!

Humans have a problem when it comes to proportions… An agonizing little alien said just that in the movie “MIB” remember? The fact that two photons travel at the speed of light from each other has nothing to do with the implications an eventual collapsing suffered by one of them will have in the other. The action taken upon the second photon was not coming from the first one but from the entire universe as a whole! We may have forgotten about its name but it's called “The law of conservation of energy.” A quantum or quanta produced inside patterns with modulating capacity equal to one-electron mass will [instantaneously] re-materialized into an allowed magnitude of energy. I said earlier that every single sub-atomic particle conceived by humans [or what's the same thing] every single quantum of energy conceived by aliens were “manufactured” inside patterns holding the mass of one-electron. The only thing that accounted for the difference between a proton “outside the atom” and any other sub-atomic particle also “outside the atom” was the density of the energy involved in the modulation. Quarks “outside the atom” were made with such dense and powerful energy that their existence was hardly perceivable. Protons were made with denser energy than electrons for what we have assigned them a relative positive charge. Electrons were considered negative since they hold a lower density of energy with respect to the previous ones.

I wouldn't leave you before quickly clarifying a small little point. The universe is not a credit card employee! It has never lent energy to any tunneling-wannabe electron behind its back… And it never will!

No one had ever borrowed energy from anyone!

Humans have unfairly accused the universe of committing the same dirty tricks they usually do “behind the back of their boss, wives or husbands” The universe never cheated and never “black-marketed” its energy with any particle with the condition of being re-paid in no time!

Learn a little bit about the spatial projection of harmonics throughout a crystal first before you dare to insult your creator!

Sometimes I ask myself why a bunch of non-fiction books on quantum mechanics actually sound worse than the worse fiction book there was. I firmly believe that “Alternative Science” could and must denounce those who think about themselves as the rightful holders of the truth… “Gods in the wrong universe.”

M. De Zayas [author]

Welcome to my homepage www.humanbydefault.com “The alien connection”

ã Copyright 2005