| |
 | |
 | |
Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0  | |
03-23-2006, 06:29 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by baudrunner Work your way out of the predicament so that we can talk. By the way, you heard the one about the mathematician with constipation? He tried to work it out with a pencil!
Therapy is something I am better able to provide than take.
So far "scispirtion" seems to be a combined form of the words scissors and aspersion, or possibly dispersion, I'm not sure. Either way, you have brilliantly illustrated my generic paradox principle which in this case is of the premature ejaculation of verboseity type (not to be confused with obesity, which I can't actually scispirt in this case through recombination) in that the word seems to be an opposite of sorts, or antonym (I don't know if you're familiar with the spelling) of the concept of combining. Could you help out? | Stop being mean to mkrikpatrick baudrunner. Nobody is allowed to say anything negative in any of my threads. Incidentally, you mispelled verboseity. I'm not saying that negatively I'm just trying to help you out since you're the one talking about spelling.  | | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0 | |
03-23-2006, 07:45 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by AntonioLao | I found very interesting your links which I have been looking at for the last few minutes. Thanks! It makes me very interested to read about primes and such because I am curious how this might relate to the TOE. I have strong suspicions that it can be shown that prime numbers are directly related to the theory of everything. What do you think Antonio? Will the TOE show us why prime numbers are so prime in importance, why odd numbers are just a little odd, and why irrational numbers are so irrational (and why the ancient Greeks believed only in rational numbers). I have a hunch that if you can find a way to predict prime numbers you will find out that it tells you something physical about reality, not just math. | | | | The Observer
Join Date: Jan 2005 Posts: 1,951
| |
03-23-2006, 08:03 PM
| | more on Sub's language
Quote: |
Originally Posted by subversion It is my belief that I have a particularly powerful nac for seeing the hidden meanings which have been instinctually and intrinsically embedded in our language by our own ancestors. For example, I ask questions like this, "is there a reason that the word correct means not only scientific truth, but the best of all possibilities and a good thing as well? | You may wish to invest in a book called a dictionary before you take credit for being so astutely observant to the phenomena of language. Believe it or not, there are few words that have only one meaning.
Did you pose for baud's picture???
__________________ David  | | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0 | |
03-23-2006, 08:39 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by dleviwing You may wish to invest in a book called a dictionary before you take credit for being so astutely observant to the phenomena of language. Believe it or not, there are few words that have only one meaning.
Did you pose for baud's picture??? | believe it or not the dictionary is all I read when I was a prisoner. And if you don't have something positive to say then don't say anything at all and especially don't post in my threads. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-24-2006, 01:44 PM
| Quote: |
Originally Posted by subversion Will the TOE show us why prime numbers are so prime in importance, | In the science of cryptology, prime numbers could be used to encrypt unbreakable codes. Therefore, if the TOE is written completely in primes then no one can break it.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0 | |
03-24-2006, 01:50 PM
| | also, any integer can be made out of multiplying certain prime numbers together. So assuming that irrationals don't exist in reality (just assuming, as in what Pythagoras believed), then all numbers that have a physical representation can be expressed as ratios of ratios of integers which themselves are composed out of prime numbers. Therefore, assuming that rational numbers must be the only rational numbers to represent reality, then prime numbers are the building blocks of those, and thus prime numbers are absolutely fundamental. Prime numbers cannot be divided by anything accept themselves and one, and they compose the integers, which compose the rationals, therefore they are the indivisible building blocks of reality. perhaps.... | | | | Banned
Join Date: Apr 2005 Posts: 562
0 | |
03-24-2006, 02:05 PM
| | also let us consider the definition of transcendental numbers. Transcendentalism is the concept of transcending reality. Therefore transcendental numbers such as pi must transcend reality, and therefore they must not really exist in reality, possibly due to the quantization of things. For example, if you draw a circle on a computer screen and you count the amount of pixels that make up the circumference, and then you count the amount of pixels that make up the diameter, and you divide the two, you will never end up with pi (I think it will be less). So perhaps transcendetal numbers exist only as mathematical constructs in our minds.
Here's a list of the different types of numbers
even numbers- these numbers are nice and even and they seem to end well
odd- these numbers are odd and out of place, they are missing something
rationals- these numbers are entirely logical for reality to use
irrationals- these numbers are entirely irrational for reality to use
transcendentals- these numbers transcend reality and do not exist therein
imaginary numbers- these numbers exist as imaginary things in our minds
real numbers- these numbers makeup reality, excluding the irrationals and transcendetnals
prime numbers- these are the prime numbers of existence, indivisible, not themselves composed of any other factors
natural numbers- these are the natural numbers (1,2,3,4, etc.). In other words, natural life is not conscious in negative reality (when the arrow of time is reversed) nor can it ever be at the zeroth moment of time. | | | | Raider of the lost time
Join Date: Nov 2003 Posts: 6,036
| |
03-24-2006, 02:07 PM
| | cryptology
for anyone interested in the uses of prime numbers in the science of cryptology please see the weblink at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptography
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
| | | | Green Belt
Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 68
14 | |
03-24-2006, 07:29 PM
| | The definitions given by mathematicians doesn´t just arise as a matter of discussion. Science is never democratic. To state a new definition, one has to check that it is in accordance with the system where one is inserting it.
Let's discuss more on the science and less on the personal spellings of the words. A discussion is more fulfilling when everybody shares without agression.
Cheers | | | | | |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes |  Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off | | |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 
VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.
| |
