“How could you explain this?”

[humanbydefault]

“How could you explain this?”

“Square Root of 2”

1 .41421 35623 73095 04880 >< 16887 24209 69807 85696

“Pi”

3.14159 26535 89793 23846>< 26433832795028841971



41421 >< 41971 [411] [42] >< [411] [97]

35623 >< 50288 [52] [33] >< [52] [88]

73095 >< 83279 [739] [05] >< [739] [82]

04880 >< 26433 [4] [88] >< [4] [62] [33]



Conclusions

[42] = [97] since 9 is the ‘image’ of 4 and 7 the ‘image’ of 2.
[33] = [88] since 8 is the ‘image’ of 3.
[05] >< [10] = [0] [0] Half-cycle but no numerical difference since 10 and 5 are equal to “0” in mathematical value.
[88] = [33] same reason. Plus [62] = 8!


QUESTIONS


Does anyone reading this post honestly believe that all this is just “pure coincidence”...?

And then we have this...


3.14159265358979323846 >< 26433832795028841971


Such a perfect symmetrical linkage between two “Wings” made up of the ‘officially accepted’ list of decimals published in the Internet Encyclopedia…
Is this also the result of a “pure coincidence” or perhaps we may be missing something…important?


Miguel De Zayas_Author of "Physimatics"

[humanbydefault]

“Pi + √2 = Reality’s half-cycle”

I will prove ‘Mathematically Speaking’ that the statement you read in the title of this thread was “the truth, just the truth and nothing but the truth, help me God”.
As in literature and performing arts I show you the two expressions of the mask (Comedy or drama)
I invite you to share, enjoy and believe my numbers or I challenge anyone to prove me wrong if you can of course…

This is the ‘Square Root of 2’…

1 .41421 35623


…and this is “Pi”


3.14159 26535


I selected 10 (ten) decimals and the ‘whole part’ too to perform the greatest numerical demonstration for the last thousand years.

I will add up each expressions –which consists in the simplest and oldest arithmetical operation since the use of numbers to represent our Reality- and I will get the legitimate representation of Reality’s “Half-Cycle” = 5.

You can do it at home by yourselves without getting hurt.

414 2 1 >>> [2] [1]

141 5 9 >>>[0] [4]


As you can easily observe from the color arrangement the first three results equal 5 by the simple operation of 4 + 1 = 5.

I will use my “Mirror Analysis” to make it easier for you to see “what’s coming later on” so I converted 5 and 9 into their corresponding ‘object configuration’ 0 and 4 on the side.

After converting those two decimals I found once again 1 + 4 = 5 on the very right position but also an extra [2]…see it? This imbalance we can observe in the fourth column will be ‘key’ to understand the symmetry later so…Keep it in mind! Let’s go to the next and final group of five decimals, shall we?


3 56 2 3

2 65 3 5

Again I colored the decimals adding up 5 found in the same column, no big deal. However if you have ‘good eyes’ I bet you see a perfect symmetrical relationship between the second and the third column, see it?

56

65

In Physics we could say that those expressions are symmetrically opposite one another so we could either count it or disregard it entirely in the final analysis… It won’t make a difference at all.
The interesting point comes next! On top we find an ‘imbalance’ one more time but this time is not a [2] but a [3]!

Oops! What could happen if we add up 2 + 3? Anyone… 5!

I guess we have an idea of what the final result of adding up √2 and “Pi” would be:

1 + 3 = 4

0.5 + 0.5 = 1.0

4 + 1.0 = 5!

It is obvious to conclude that twice this result will be the final (empirical) representation of a complete ‘Quantum of Reality’s cycle’ which is 10!

Which ‘mask’ would you choose? The “happy one” or the “angry one”?



It is entirely irrelevant to me whether you choose one instead of the other, but you feel better in the inside with the first one…

God bless you and thanks for visiting my thread.



Miguel De Zayas_Author of "Physimatics"

[humanbydefault]

I felt necessary to include yet this important and final analysis about the last step. I know there is ‘room’ for some Mathematicians to feel a little bit uncomfortable leaving the symmetry seen at:

56


65

Some even may believe that symmetry itself may be in danger by it… To put those ‘minds’ to rest I will show you something…
Remember that 6 I said was the ‘image’ of 1? Very well! Let’s make an EVEN conversion with all four numbers, shall we?

01


10

If we were to place them accordingly to the decimal order in their own column it would seem like this:

11

Isn’t it interesting? You add up 0.555… and 0.555… and not only that you obtain as a result one unit to be carried on to the left of the decimal point but also as many 0.1 as (n-1) considering “n” the number 5s in the expression. For n = 3 the result would be 1.11, etc.
Since I included 10 decimals from √2 and Pi and at the end the result was 5.11 it is telling me that the same result could have been obtained by considering those two constants as follows:
√2 = 1.414
Pi = 3.141
The 3 dimensional nature of our Reality causes the mutual cancellation of numbers under the ‘object-image’ principle eliminating this discrepancy seen with 0.1111… That nature of our Reality is what makes most numbers irrational.