Quote:
|
Originally Posted by AntonioLao |
As you know, my theory is called the Aether Physics Model. This is because I precisely quantify space-time, which at the quantum level is really space-resonance. I also show that each quantum particle is encapsulated by one quantum of space-time. Thus, when an electron moves, the electron is not moving relative to it's own space-time, but the space-time that encapsulates it is moving relative to every other quantum unit of space-time.
Subatomic particles can bind, and when they do, the space-time they are encapsulated by also bind. Actually, the quantum units of Aether fold over onto each other, such that space-time condenses as matter condenses.
Since gravity holds our atmosphere to the Earth, the whole Earth is basically a bound ball of space-time, moving through the solar system, which is another bound unit of space-time, which is moving through the galaxy, which is yet another grouping of space-time. When the Earth moves through the solar system, the denser Earth stirs the thinner Aether associated with the solar system. It's like moving your finger through a bucket of water.
As stated on the page, this effect is called frame dragging in the Standard Model. It is interesting that Michelson and Morley proved that there was an Aether drift, which is the same thing as frame dragging, and they were ridiculed. The only difference between Michelson-Morley and Brill-Cohen is that MM called it Aether and BC called it frame dragging. I've looked out the back side of the Earth while it moved around the Sun and I have never seen any frames. I don't recall anybody ever quantifying a frame such that it would have the property of being able to be dragged (other than picture frames, maybe).
Michelson-Morley was followed by Morley-Miller, and eventually Dayton Miller went on to do more experiments. There were well over 100,000 replications of the experiments over 20 years. The results consistently showed that there was an Aether drift of ten thousand kilometers per second. The only problem was that people thought the Aether drift would be much faster. It was said that the Aether drift experiments could be explained if the Aether dragged with the Earth, but Einstein wouldn't have any part of it because it would spell the end of his Special Relativity Theory. But along comes two fellows who change the name from Aether to frame dragging and everybody is happy. Einstein's theory is still safe because there is no Aether, and the frame dragging evidence can be recognized.
Back to the bucket. Mach is partially right, the water is spinning relative to the Earth. But Newton is also right, because the Earth is rotating relative to a greater space-time reference. Space-time is absolute at the local level and relative at the macro level. This is because subatomic particles are encapsulated by space-time. When subatomic particles form atoms, the atoms are a tight system of absolute space-time. When the atoms bind to produce molecules, the molecules can shift around somewhat and so while its still produces a fairly good absolute space-time reference for the subatomic particles involved, it is less absolute than the constituent atoms.
Similarly, as molecules produce cells or crystals, there is still a fairly good absolute space-time reference, but it is much less absolute than the molecular stage. The cells might produce organs and the organs might produce humans. The cells of my body are more or less absolutely placed, however, there is a fairly good degree of movement such that the cells in my fingers are always changing reference to the cells in my toes.
The same goes for other objects, like oceans. On a large scale, the ocean is a fairly rigid body of water, but the water molecules have a great degree of freedom within the ocean compared to the molecules in my body. The atmosphere, even more so. So absolute space-time exists at the quantum level, but it disolves to relative space-time as we become focused on the macro structures that arise from the subatomic particles binding together.
The Earth is fairly dense compared to outer space. So a bucket of water could reference the Aether associated with the Earth as its absolute space-time to a small degree. But at most, the Aether associated with the Earth can be only twice as dense as the Aether of outer space, which is hardly even noticeable. The Earth is not completely dense, like a neutron star, so there is Aether flowing through the Earth that is associated with the solar system, the galaxy, and the Universe. For the most part, the Universe does have an absolute space-time reference, and that is what most objects spin relative to.
The Earth is an example. Just as Newton's bucket cause water to bulge up the side of the bucket, the rotating Earth causes water to bulge at the equator. The rotating Earth also cause a Foucault pendulum to change direction throughout the day.
All the nonsense about Einstein's theory only applying to linear velocities and not rotational velocities is laughable. I get a big chuckle out of it every time I think about it. Einstein really believed he could design physics the way he wanted to, independent of the way the Universe worked. And Berkeley, when he said that the bucket was rotating relative to the stars... The stars are too far away to have a noticeable gravitational effect on planes flying through the atmosphere, but they can lift water up the side of a bucket when it rotates? And the stars are so uniformly distributed throughout space that they apply equal effect in all directions? Most non-scientists know the Earth is on the outer edge of the galaxy and that the Sun and Moon have a huge gravitational influence on the Earth. Why can't we see variations in the behavior of rotating water with respect to a New Moon and a Full Moon?
The short of it is that space-time is more involved than being a uniform fabric. It is composed of quantum units of Aether, which behaves simultaneously like a perfect solid, fluid, and gas. This Aether also encapsulates matter, and the matter causes motion of the Aether through the actions of the forces.