ToeQuest

We're going on a TOE Quest!


Register

Reply

Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-11-2006, 04:37 PM
Re: who is who in math?

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
something from nothing at a subatomic level?
That nothing must be something but not empirically determined.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
6th degree Black Belt

Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 844
Blog Entries: 3
19 harmonygirl will become famous soon enough
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-11-2006, 05:39 PM
Cool Re: who is who in math?

If nothing is something (however determined), there can logically be no beginning to creation of energy, matter and space-time, no?
__________________
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
Reply With Quote
harmonygirl is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-18-2006, 03:24 PM
Re: who is who in math?

Quote:
Originally Posted by harmonygirl
there can logically be no beginning to creation of energy, matter and space-time, no?
Space-time quanta as squares of energy could never be destroyed or created. They can only be regrouped to form ordinary matter and energy.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Orange Belt

Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 28
19 LeoK is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-21-2006, 01:02 PM
Re: who is who in math?

This thread's title is "who is who in math?"...

So I'm trying to make a post on this subject.

Can only for the moment stumble into the very often arguing between
math believers and non math believer seen so often in the news groups.

The eternal arguing on the one hand that the mathematician is the only
one to solve all problem in physics. And the opposite almost maniac belief
that the mathematician just is a great flop, in physics at least.

Think you heard all that before...

One can perhaps make a stand in this "war" by making a strainer issue:

Can the mathematician (the educated, skilful and the interested) make
an profound contribution to the issue of TOE?

Or has any mathematician done so?

LeoK
Reply With Quote
LeoK is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
06-25-2006, 04:00 PM
Re: who is who in math?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeoK
Or has any mathematician done so?
Ed Witten is supposed to have done that for the unification of 5 superstring theories.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
In Training

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3
0 phoenixthoth is on a distinguished road
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
05-01-2008, 06:28 PM
Re: who is who in math?

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao View Post
What happens when P = ∞ ? Would ∞ + 1 be composite?

Nothing happens. P+1=P so either P and P+1 are both prime or both composite, depending on what your definition of this P is, the notion of primality is for this P, and non-primality, as well as the definition of whatever P+1 is if P = "infinity," which is, by the way, not a very well defined and ambiguous symbol at best.
Reply With Quote
phoenixthoth is offlineReport Post
Raider of the lost time

AntonioLao's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,036
Blog Entries: 6
86 AntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to beholdAntonioLao is a splendid one to behold
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Quote  
05-01-2008, 08:25 PM
Re: who is who in math?

Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenixthoth
P+1=P so either P and P+1 are both prime or both composite
For example, if P is the integer number 2 then it is prime and 2+1=3 is also prime.
__________________
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
Reply With Quote
AntonioLao is offlineReport Post
Reply

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
God Guille Intelligent Design 192 12-01-2007 02:57 PM
Who is to deal with phillosophy of math? hanzoganz Philosophy of Math 4 05-08-2006 10:15 PM
single math misunderstanding AntonioLao Philosophy of Math 46 03-11-2006 11:54 AM
TOE math on the way? d p fitzpatrick Your TOE Theory 0 02-18-2005 02:54 PM



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:34 PM. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 VBulletin Skin by ForumMonkeys.