It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Tools > Mathematics > Philosophy of Math
Reload this Page who is who in math?
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
who is who in math?
Old
  (#1 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
who is who in math? - 10-17-2005, 03:58 PM

Who are the intuitionists? The logicists and the formalists? Are there anyone here belonging to any of this groups? Once you identify as a member of one the groups, this post is requesting enlightenment from whoever you are concerning your philosophical stand why math is useful to the progress of science and the humanities.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#2 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 02:17 AM

What is mathematical formalism?


I consider mself a logicist, but not to an exagerated extend. logicists believe that mathematics can not only be reduced and explaine din terms of a logical language, but that it is in full concordance with logic itself. I don't. I believe that maths can be reduced and explained by logic, but not that both re in full concordance. Please see my thread "Mathematics and Logic"
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#3 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
10-18-2005, 11:37 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUILLE
I consider mself a logicist
So, you agree with what Frege did although his idea of building math on logic did have many appearances of paradoxes. Later, Russell and Whitehead continued to build the logistic school. However, this is my question: How do we use logic to answer Riemann Hypothesis in seeking where every prime to infinity will occur?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#4 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 03:51 PM

But I have a disticntion from Frege and the young Russell (when he discoevered his paradox, his change his view on logic), and it is that I believe tha math can be reduced to logic, but not explained by it.


About the infinite prime, well, I can asure you that it will be solve. It's a just a hypothesis that hasn't been proven. Is it in any way special? I doubt it. Fermat's last theorem made generations of mathematicians go crazy and/or depressed... But it was solved, around the time that I was learning to add and substract.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#5 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
10-18-2005, 04:01 PM

The biggest prime question: Is infinity a prime number?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#6 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-18-2005, 04:21 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
The biggest prime question: Is infinity a prime number?
WOW! These kind of questions are the kind of math questions that I love.

I think we shoudl first determine two things:

1. Is it a prime question or an infinity question?

2. Is infinity a prime or the prime sequence infinite?
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#7 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
10-18-2005, 04:43 PM

how about infinity plus 1? Is infinity plus 1 a prime number?


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#8 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-19-2005, 04:53 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
how about infinity plus 1? Is infinity plus 1 a prime number?
If and only if the space between prime numbers get's bigger each time you go upper in numbers, then infinity plus 1 cannot be a prime if infinity is a prime, or vice versa. Thus, either infinity is a prime, or infinity plus one is a prime, or none is a prime.

But this is if we treat infinity as a number, and if we believe that there is a difference between infinity and infinity plus 1. And I disagree with both of these.
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#9 (permalink))
Raider of the lost time
AntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really niceAntonioLao is just really nice
 
AntonioLao's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 5,147
Thanks Given: 659
Thanked 103x in 102 Posts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Rep Power: 72
   
10-20-2005, 11:49 AM

in binary notation infinity is ...111111111111111111111111111, there are infinite ones to the left. Adding another 1 wont change or break the sequence. Since a prime is defined as a number divisible by itself and 1 then infinity and infinity plus 1 are both primes.


Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: a(tr(t)=c²
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Old
  (#10 (permalink))
The Thinker
Guille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the roughGuille is a jewel in the rough
 
Guille's Avatar
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3,278
Thanks Given: 14
Thanked 9x in 9 Posts
Join Date: Mar 2005
Rep Power: 47
   
10-21-2005, 05:10 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by AntonioLao
in binary notation infinity is ...111111111111111111111111111, there are infinite ones to the left. Adding another 1 wont change or break the sequence. Since a prime is defined as a number divisible by itself and 1 then infinity and infinity plus 1 are both primes.
hummmm................

But that's the same as saying that 1.11111111111111111111111..... is a prime and so is tat number plus 1: 2.111111111111111111111....... Of course. But infinity doesn't have a size such as 1111111111111111111111111111...... or anything. It is a limit, and that's all. So itself cannot be sized and neither can any kind of infinity or addition ro multiplications includng infinite (s).
  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
God Guille Intelligent Design 192 12-01-2007 01:57 PM
Who is to deal with phillosophy of math? hanzoganz