Primeval Parodox?

[Tesla]

The Big Bang. The Singularity. The Primeval Atom. If the universe expanded from this point faster than the speed of light would it not go backwards in time to that point; being stuck in an infinite cycle of inflating faster than light and then in turn immediatly condensing back to a singularity? Someone please explain.

[mkirkpatrick]

Tesla,There will no doubt be many queuing up to give you a detailed
account of how it occured,and no doubt it will be very complex and involve
lots of numbers and equations!Or you can look at how i am sure it all came
about,and there will be a complete absense of any formulas or equations.
The whole of universal creation is the product of thought,the universe came
about,when the One,the absolute,focussed its attention,and formulated the
"idea" the "bring about" and to "inform" intent,The Protyle atom,was the "point"of "exit"from Absolute Potentuality,to the Beginning of relativity and the departure from absolute unity,this was enabled at this "point" which was
the Primeval paradox,the Primeval atom,and the Primeval Singularity,from
whence all did flow from at an ordered rate of expansion?The laws of physics
as we know them today,were somewhat different then,as this unfolding
involutionary process outworked and obeyed the focussed intention,there came about a point where matter was super-dense!Much different thanwe see today.
Well Tesla,thats a taster of what happened?

regards michael.

[gautam]

Thelsa, It was perhaps not faster than the speed of light it was just the speed of light.The intrigue is that as to how it new that this is the optimum speed to keep expanding for ever. Now looking back if it was different, then it would have been a different universe with different speed of light.

[mkirkpatrick]

Thelsa, It was perhaps not faster than the speed of light it was just the speed of light.The intrigue is that as to how it new that this is the optimum speed to keep expanding for ever. Now looking back if it was different, then it would have been a different universe with different speed of light.

Interesting you say that,gautam,is this idea of a differing speed of light
contained in your mest theory?

regards michael.

[gautam]

No please
I mean ,then by anthropic principle ,We would not have been hear discussing all this. To make it simple believe it happened many times and the universe got collapsed. Till it exploded with the force that gave it this speed of expansion.Anyway Mest theory is avoiding singularity totally as the mass , energy and spacetime of this universe in toto can never be zero .
WARM REGARDS
Gautam

[mkirkpatrick]

No please
I mean ,then by anthropic principle ,We would not have been hear discussing all this. To make it simple believe it happened many times and the universe got collapsed. Till it exploded with the force that gave it this speed of expansion.Anyway Mest theory is avoiding singularity totally as the mass , energy and spacetime of this universe in toto can never be zero .
WARM REGARDS
Gautam

So then it will always be set at one?Until obscuration,where it will return
to zero!
regards michael.

[gautam]

No Michael!
It will remain between to infinities.The mass via atoms, particles,quartz, clours and flavours ends into space and here the quantum infinity merges into
large scale infinity ,the spatial infinity ,which encompasses the universe we see. Raise questions and travel alongwith me to the ultimate truth, Michael !
Warm Regards
Gautam

[dleviwing]

The Big Bang. The Singularity. The Primeval Atom. If the universe expanded from this point faster than the speed of light would it not go backwards in time to that point; being stuck in an infinite cycle of inflating faster than light and then in turn immediatly condensing back to a singularity? Someone please explain.

Telsa;
It’s only a mathematical illusion, not a true reversal of absolute time.