[austintorn@aol.com]

TOE Clues?

What can we make of nature’s occasional revelations that scientists make note of, but may go no further with. Are they telling us something remarkable about reality?


Planck length — What happens, if anything, inside the Plank distance? Is there another reality there?

Size — Is there a limit to how large or how small things can be?

Dreams — Why does the reality of night dreams match that of waking reality? Does this mean reality is projected?

Speed of Light — Why is it limited?

Eternal Substance — How come it is a specific particular thing that works, as opposed to something that didn’t? Whether it manifested from possibility or was always there, what decided its form? Is it like the quantum world suggests, the most probable of all possibilities?

No time like the present — Why does time seem to go so fast when we use the internet? And why does it seem to go so slow in grade school? I used to purposely not look at the clock for a long time in school so that it would have a chance to leap ahead, but it never did. But while on the internet I lit up a cigarette and it seemed to burn out in a matter of seconds.

Living Forever — Perhaps someday humans will live forever, barring fatal accidents. What would be the implications of that? DNA rips at the ends when it divides and replicates 50 times or so during our lives, limiting the damage to junk DNA until that is all gone and our good DNA deteriorates. It is not that simple to fix, but could we just add more junk at the ends and live forever? Not that we wouldn’t break something else by doing so, but suppose it worked eventually.

Everything connected — If everything is connected to everything, as suggested by quantum entanglement, is this a kind of “perception” that we can use?

[mkirkpatrick]

Thanks again Austin,indivisibility is one clue from mother natures box of expressions,
upon the backdrop of the infinite and the eternal,whether a thing is infinitely large or small
becomes irrelevent,totally irrelevent.



regards michael.

[Lloyd Gillespie]

Hi Austin, thanks for a few good questions.

Originally Posted by austintorn@aol.com TOE Clues? What can we make of nature’s occasional revelations that scientists make note of, but may go no further with. Are they telling us something remarkable about reality? Planck length — What happens, if anything, inside the Plank distance? Is there another reality there? [IMO, yes. Here's what I posted on Planet Bob's thread about the mechanics of Planck length, inside the electron. "Since we both agree it's a FS photonic universe, let the basic aether field be filled with stationary photons___size doesn't matter for this simple model. Now strip your mind of other wave interactions for simplicity's sake. Picture an electron traveling straight through the FS photon sea___any wave/particle traveling through such a sea must increase in mass as it approaches true c. Where does the mass increase come from? The electron must gain photons as mass increase___there's no other source. Velocity and density of the FS photon field require this. Velocity also creates heat. What is being heated, since the electron is also made of photons? The only possible answer is photons___simple logic. Now, what is truly happening inside the electron as it increases photon mass and heat? The electron is acting first as a condensor storage magnetic moment capacitor, then as a radiating generator of electricity moments. What is making up this process? Photons___plain and simple. This all is happening at the speed of light___mass is increasing creating the magnetic moment of the em wave, and then critical mass entropy is reached and the electron radiates/generates its electric moment. This is all photon on photin action, and is the same for all frequencies of light and waves. It's just faster for faster waves, such as gamma rays, and slower for micro-waves. They all must increase in mass proportional to true velocity. We just have trouble distinguishing between true c and sub-c velocities. Nature does it quite easily___just imagine how many entropy cycles in a gamma ray traveling only a short distance. The electron, we seem to know more about, thanks to Maxwell and others, is still frequencies of mass entropy cycles, and the attendent velocities, that create the varrying heats of photons contained and radiated as the heat of mass velocities. I can't imagine why you still think photons don't change temperature, when all is of photons...?"] Size — Is there a limit to how large or how small things can be? [The most infinitesimal entity can be no smaller than the absolute fundamental substance, whatever that may be.] Speed of Light — Why is it limited? [The aether matter density limits the speed of local c, as do gasses and liquids, and even ulexite. Increase the density of any substance light is passing through, and light must slow.] Eternal Substance — How come it is a specific particular thing that works, as opposed to something that didn’t? Whether it manifested from possibility or was always there, what decided its form? Is it like the quantum world suggests, the most probable of all possibilities? [That's it. The highest probability, of the highest possibility, is the only possibility.] No time like the present — Why does time seem to go so fast when we use the internet? And why does it seem to go so slow in grade school? I used to purposely not look at the clock for a long time in school so that it would have a chance to leap ahead, but it never did. But while on the internet I lit up a cigarette and it seemed to burn out in a matter of seconds. [Oh, how time flys, when you're enjoying yourself.] Living Forever — Perhaps someday humans will live forever, barring fatal accidents. What would be the implications of that? DNA rips at the ends when it divides and replicates 50 times or so during our lives, limiting the damage to junk DNA until that is all gone and our good DNA deteriorates. It is not that simple to fix, but could we just add more junk at the ends and live forever? Not that we wouldn’t break something else by doing so, but suppose it worked eventually. [RNAi is just around the corner, to solve the very problems you speak.] Everything connected — If everything is connected to everything, as suggested by quantum entanglement, is this a kind of “perception” that we can use?

IMO, once enough people can get all this over-complexity out of their systems, we can concentrate on designing simple systems, to solve all our planet's problems, simply.

Lloyd

[G_burnett]

Hi there, very good questions.

"What can we make of nature’s occasional revelations that scientists make note of, but may go no further with. Are they telling us something remarkable about reality?"Unquote.

If they made it that simple they would be out of a job.


"Planck length — What happens, if anything, inside the Plank distance? Is there another reality there?"Unquote.

Relative to what reality?

"Size — Is there a limit to how large or how small things can be?"Unquote.

Relative to what, may be the real quest ion.

"Dreams — Why does the reality of night dreams match that of waking reality? Does this mean reality is projected?" Unquote.

Yes but try to prove it to someone other then yourself.

"Speed of Light — Why is it limited?" Unquote

Who told you that garbage?

"Eternal Substance — How come it is a specific particular thing that works, as opposed to something that didn’t? Whether it manifested from possibility or was always there, what decided its form? Is it like the quantum world suggests, the most probable of all possibilities?" Unquote.

I have a rocks picked up on the ocean shore and the rock forms shows a picture of our own perception of existence ... one a human being with a dog in his arms, maybe a sheep and over the head of the animal a clear hand with fingers in a blessing. the mans head looking up and with a halo seems to be looking at the white crystal dots on a dark black background as we might look to the stars. ... i do not think then that we are the most probable of all possibilities as the rock was formed millions of years be for man and may have just been a notation sketch book thingy of a higher force ... paradox indeed.

"No time like the present — Why does time seem to go so fast when we use the internet? And why does it seem to go so slow in grade school? I used to purposely not look at the clock for a long time in school so that it would have a chance to leap ahead, but it never did. But while on the internet I lit up a cigarette and it seemed to burn out in a matter of seconds." Unquote.

The relativity of time is paradox to the sentient persona trying to look at the watch, the human piece of thingy we created to measure the space between tax returns, ignore it.

"Living Forever — Perhaps someday humans will live forever, barring fatal accidents. What would be the implications of that? DNA rips at the ends when it divides and replicates 50 times or so during our lives, limiting the damage to junk DNA until that is all gone and our good DNA deteriorates. It is not that simple to fix, but could we just add more junk at the ends and live forever? Not that we wouldn’t break something else by doing so, but suppose it worked eventually." unquote

It is to my understanding that we only replicate 3 times but have the capability to do so 50. An elephant has the capability to do it 300 times. The simple fix is.

"Everything connected — If everything is connected to everything, as suggested by quantum entanglement, is this a kind of “perception” that we can use?[/quote]" unquote

Depends if you are a word thinker scribbling dots in varied organization to some inner preference or learned rote or if you see pictures.

Peace! ~ Graham.