And, yet, a person, one who has I-thoughts, is always personalized, never de-personalized by his constitution. The message is 'I', the messenger merely the implementation.
You just wish all not to be chemical, but wishes cannot make things so. The deeper claim of the extraordinary is vacant, whilst the neurological method has been confirmed. Thus, there could not be any more difference in evidence.
“What It Is Like To Be”
What would it be like to be another kind of creature?
Do I-thoughts of self-consciousness emerge
From their integration of experiences?
Who knows about the ‘I’, but, in a sense,
We already know about being other creatures,
For we already have been during our development:
The growth of a human parallels and recapitulates,
At a vastly accelerated rate, the evolution of life.
We start out as a single-celled organism,
Much like an amoeba or a bacterium.
Then we progress through the phase of a blastula,
A simple, undifferentiated multicellular stage,
To become an embryo barely distinguishable
From those of many other animals, even
Including those of reptiles and amphibians.
For these first few weeks after conception,
We are truly a lower form of life ourselves,
Bathing, as long ago, in the warm amniotic sea.
So, how did it feel to you? Can you recall?
No, for you were not around at the time;
There was no developed conscious sense of self.
But, now we do feel like someone, having inner depth,
Our activity and actuality being one and the same.
(As once there was no 'I',
'you' then arrived and then there was,
via the chemical process
of growth after conception)


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote


