Attached Files

II. The HyperGeometrical Universe - Cosmology.pdf (56.8 KB, 48 views)

This reminds me very muchof the empty nest thread,that was posted some months ago,I will have to read through very closely and see if that is the case.
It supposed that we were riding a shock wave,forever chasing the perfect
vacuum,or void!

regards michael.

Thanks Michael for your comment. Shock wave is not exactly the perfect description. In this model, everything moves radially at the speed of light and as one would expect any disturbance of spacetime will also travel at that speed, thus there isn't any other option for the "shock wave"... It is more light a flash of spacetime disturbance. I am not sure about an empty nest thread, but this idea makes more sense when you check the support provided by the Grand Unification Equations.

Notice that all our three-dimensional motion is basically a change of k-vector for the spacetime wave source (X Particle).

Please, if you have time, read the the papers and review the equations... Any feedback is always welcome and needed..:)

I forgot to say that in this model, the Universe is in expansion and that doesn't depend upon the Universe mass content nor Dark Matter, Dark Energy or anything slightly shadowy... This is an expanding four-dimensional Universe. Einstein could only see three dimensions and thus was concerned with the mass content of the Universe and the mass induced curvature. In this model, these kind of considerations might have a meaning locally. The average curvature is defined by HyperGeometry (or Geometry)...

In fact, there is perfected unperturbed five-dimensional spacetime before and after the ultra-thin Universe passes through...>:)

Best,

MP

Interesting theorm.

I have to ask, have you ever concidered the Holographic Universe? It is similar to what you are purposing. Also, I wonder about your X-particle. It reminds me of characteristics that I predict in my own theorm regarding the nature of monopoles within said Holoverse.

I missed an important point in my description of why things move when they are not influenced by any force:

The HyperGeometrical Universe Theory shows that non-inertial motion takes place through the change in propagation vector. Two radial trajectories (outgoing along the Radial fourth-dimension or k-vector along the Radial direction) at positions separated by alpha radians (see figure above) will run away (Hubble expansion) from each other at speed alpha * c (velocity of light). If a body starts moving from Point A with speed alpha*c, it will continue moving until it reaches a point alpha radians from Point A (Point B). Reaching that Point B the body will simply move outwards while its Hubble speed from Point A will remain alpha*C. In this model , motion is due to a change in k-vector which has a dual equivalent as a local spacetime deformation. The motion from point A to point B relaxes spacetime and make it naturally curved again. This means that the HyperGeometrical Universe Theory provides the reason for free motion and complements Newton's Law...:)

The point that was missing in the argument was that spacetime relaxation within the four-dimensional shell is the reason for motion. The relaxed motion is always an outwads motion consistent with the relaxation of the local k-vector (normal to the local region of spacetime) from oblique to perpendicular to the shell.

KAC,

Thanks for the message. I was always puzzled by Mach's concept that inertia was due to the non-local interaction of a body with the rest of the Universe. Mach also had a concept of an Universal time. I studied how non-local interaction could influence a body motion and reached the conclusion that just spacetime deformation resistance was enough to explain inertia.

I have to confess ignorance of the details of the Holographic Universe, but I know Holography and know that in holography the resulting scattering is a phased sum of the interaction of the incident wave with the whole hologram and that would indicate that non-locality is present in the Holographic Universe. I have trouble with that since I found one explanation for inertia in which everything moves at the a speed that is not more nor less than the speed of light. That includes any interaction of the one and only force in this model.

KAC, if I am off on the Holographic Model and you would like to direct me towards your pdfs, I will be happy to take a look.

Thanks,

MP

With respect to the x-Particles, they are the equivalent to the quark composition of matter. In the HyperGeometrical Universe Standard Model, I propose an equivalence between quark composition and the axis lengths of the four-dimensional ellipsoids (X-Particles). This means that structured collision (non-spherical cross sections) can be recovered using X-Particles. It also means that all particles are just different states of particles X and that particle creation is just non-linear hadronic interaction of solitonic deformations of spacetime in a way that is obvious similar to non-linear optics. This means that hadronic laser effect or coherent nuclear reactions are easy to create. The theory is also provides the means to control gravitation.

By the way, internal degrees of freedom (spin, color, strangeness etc) correspond to rotation around different axis of this four-dimensional X Particle. All internal degrees of freedom are externalized by this theory.

Since I consider particles as states of matter and since the theory explains magnetism using the simple four-dimensional wave interference process, there is never a prediction of a magnetic monopole in it.

In fact, magnetism is has an amazing explanation. Waves generated by traveling particles suffer Lorentzian anisotropic compression. This means that they are compressed in the direction of relative motion and normal perpendicular to that motion. Electrons and protons have different quark composition and thus different amplitudes for their waves (contrary phases).
In an infinitesimal current element, the electrons are in motion thus having their four-dimensional waves Lorentzian compressed while the protons waves show no compression. This means that each proton/electron pair has a net dipole. The resulting overall wave has polarity (anisotropy) and that is the origin of magnetism. Notice that fermions (spin 1/2) particles will reverse polarity at each de Broglie expansional step of the Universe. The expansion along the radial (fourth-dimension) direction is quantized in de Broglie steps.

Thanks,

MP

I just read this thread... what happened to the simple?

Hi CyborGuy...

I explained things bit by bit in my own blog
http://hypergeometricaluniverse.blogspot.com

The theory was explained in more than 100 blogs or 350 pages..:)... but I still think it is a simple theory...:) for the theory of everything...:)

Cheers,

MP

ps- if you come to my blog and ask me any questions,I will be happy to explain it over and over again...:)

MP

I really don't know if you will see this but your thread came up as a random alert on the front page of Toe and I read it and also went to your site. I've saved it for my site because it's interesting the way you have developed it and your drawings.

I'm an idealist/figmentalist and always wonder where people such as yourself (scientists) think that the space for such expansion came from and also what sort of container is it all in, or do you think of the space your expansion requires is a natural state of reality or non-reality?

Remember if you use the word Infinity (or the sideways 8) you are using a ? and not really proposing anything.

Rufe