ToeQuest

ARTICLE 2

Note: For the benefit of those who might not have read the previous articles, the foundational basis of Zeron Theory is repeated at the beginning of each article.


This article reveals the mechanism behind Uncertainty Theory and Particle/Wave Duality. To do this in a very short article I am going to start with some models that were more rigorously derived in the original development of the theory. You can get more information by following the link at the end of this article.


The Basic Foundational Model

* There is an Aether. It consists of an all-pervasive 'atmosphere' of prime particles called Zerons
* All Zerons are identical, and are totally elastic, frictionless, have inertial mass but zero gravitational mass, and come in two varieties, fast and slow.
* Fast Zerons travel at a velocity of root 2 x c and inter-collide to form a type of Aether which we have named the Cosma. The Cosma is a resonant Perfect Fluid.
* Matter consists of resonating agglomerations of Slow Zerons held together by pressure from the Cosma.
* Matter resonates at a frequency different to that of the Cosma.
* The Zeron constitutes an unimaginably small class of matter and can be shown to have a mass of 7.39 x10p-46 gms compared to an electron mass of 9.11 x 10p-28 gms. There are therefore 1, 33 x 10p18 Zerons in an electron!


The Basic Foundational Atom

Consider the hydrogen atom. The Proton nucleus consists of an agglomeration of slow resonating Zerons within the resonant Cosma.
Their interaction produces a denser region in the Cosma in the form of a spherical standing wave shell of Zerons. This is the electron shell.
Light emanates from the atom after it is first excited so that the electron shell jumps to the next permissible radius and then collapses to emit an outwardly expanding sphere of light manifested as a series of Zeron impact waves travelling through the Cosma at a velocity c in every direction. If we now accelerate the atom through the Cosma the Zeron pressure at the front of the nucleus becomes greater than at the back. This distorts both the nucleus and the electron shell. As soon as the acceleration stops a steady state returns and the atom retains its distorted shape.


The Electronless Atom and Uncertainty

In this model of the atom it is the interaction between a resonating nucleus and a resonating Aether that results in the standing wave shell due to constructive reinforcement and destructive interference. Pictorial representations of the 'fuzzy' quantum atom and this model are identical if one replaces the 'location probability' function of the quantum atom with a 'density of Zerons'. So the conventional scientists got it right, right?

Well, there's one major difference in the Zeron model. In this electron shell there are nodes of higher Zeron concentrations, which are the seed nodes for the formation of electrons, but no actual electrons are to be found anywhere! No electrons in the atom? Surely not! The electron has been an integral part of the atom since the earliest days of modern physics. Its properties and mass have been accurately determined. Yet this unlikely scenario of no electrons gels perfectly with the main tenets of Uncertainty Theory as well as that of Particle/ Wave Duality.

In 1927 Heisenberg quantified particle uncertainty with his famous "Uncertainty Principle". According to this theory, not only could one not absolutely determine both the momentum and position of an electron (or photon), but that they simply did not posses both a momentum and a position simultaneously. This very remarkable theory, which robs matter of one of its fundamental properties has never been adequately explained. It turns out that he was right but in a way that he could never have guessed.

The Zeron model shows no sign whatsoever of the presence of an electron in the electron shell. Only once the atom is subjected to the right conditions is an electron formed. What conditions? Any experiment designed to detect electrons will de facto produce exactly the conditions required to bleed an electron out of the shell. It's not that the electron doesn't possess either momentum or position, it's that the electron is either a traveling wave which has momentum or is a condensed particle, which has a position. It's either a wave or a particle. It's not a property-deficient electron. In fact there's a strong case to be made that the electron is not a natural particle at all, but is a man-made construct. There's much more to debunking Uncertainty Theory but we will need to develop Zeron Theory a bit more before returning to this process.


The Electronless Atom and Particle/Wave Duality

The famous Young twin slit experiment lacks adequate explanation more than 100 years after he performed it. He sent light through two slits onto a screen. The image that formed showed an interference pattern which proved conclusively that light consisted of waves. The trouble came when some bright spark scientists sent photon particles through the slots one at a time and found the same pattern! Chaos ensued and it still hasn't ended.

The solution is to be found using the same logic as for Uncertainty Theory. But firstly it might be well to point out that it is simply not possible in any experiment to project a 'photon' particle in any particular chosen direction. How on earth does the scientist ensure that his (by definition) omni-directional light source will conveniently steer a single photon to the slots regard less of how he tries to steer it. To ensure this would require a near infinite number of photons to be produced to get just one on target.

No, the atom produces light in an ever-expanding spherical light shell that consists of the impact driven oscillations of Zerons in a light wave. It continues to stay that way until it hits a particle detector when it will register as a particle. It is this light wave shell that passes through both slots to produce the interference pattern. Then the wave hits the screen to register as a photon particle and the shell collapses. That's how the experiment works. The photon is always a wave and only registers as a particle on meeting particle detectors of whatever sort.

If this article has piqued your interest you could go to www.tedjaeckel.com for more complete information. In Article 3 I will be describing the mechanics of Inertia.

I hope I have not trodden on too many TOEs. Critique of what is presented here is always welcome.

Ted Jaeckel
(tedjay)