The Intersection Point of the two Infinities

Tesla TOE Member Quest Prime Numbers

The Intersection Point of the Two Infinities

We know by now that we don’t know most of our universe- to be exact we just understand 4 % of the universe and the remaining 96% of it which presumably is the dark energy(73%) and the dark matter( 23%), and that still remains a mystery that makes the picture more intriguing than ever before . The modern physics seems to be totally in the grip of this thought. Recently to a gathering of physicists ,Nobel laureate James Watson Cronin suggested that answer perhaps lies at the intersection of infinitely small and the infinitely large. I am sure that this Nobel physicist would have never heard of my hitherto unknown Mest theory of everything. Nor he would know that an outsider is trying hard to push the idea of ‘small scale infinity’.
The small scale infinity shall find it place soon in the scientific realm and it is certainly a bad news for the ‘zero’. That apart, we need here to understand first the intersection point of the two infinities, in other words the point where the big and the small meet. Those who are little conversant with the Mest Toe will find easy to recall my views on that. The big infinity meets the small one at all the possible points of this universe. It is not a classical but a quantum meeting.
What is truly infinite in the cosmic sense? It is certainly not something as big that it doesn’t have an end as understood in the lay or classical perception of the infinity. Bigness does not impart infiniteness to any thing. Big, however big may it be, has to have an end. Big and infinite have no correlation. Infinite means a circular path in a four dimensional universe. For example , the path of an electron around a nucleus or the path of planets around the sun or the path of galaxies or the path of the universe as whole ,are all infinite. These material bodies can keep traveling on these infinite paths not ever once repeating it. This is the infinity, the quantum on the lower scale and the spatial on the higher scale.
Where lays the intersection point of the two? According to the mest theory the intersection point exists everywhere. From the point at the boundary of a neutrino higher upto the boundary of a galaxy, at all point the big infinity meets the small. To put it differently, the universe is a continuum and intersecting a continuous truth at any point shall kill the truth before you have known it. We can try to peep into, just by removing a piece of the jigsaw to see the breaking line but need to put it back to get the complete picture again.
Mest means that piece of totality.
When space is something internal to the matter how is then an intersection possible?
We first need to understand the point that when we move an iron ball in the so called space the iron takes its space alongwith it. It has no relation with the space it is occupying now or it was occupying before. The ball has its space intact inside it which can pass through any other space whose mest is lighter than that of the ball. A neutrino like wise passes through the space of the iron ball since the former has the mest value higher than that of the ball.
The space exists inside the matter. What we are referring as space is the layers of matter into the layers of matter. The layers we can see like the one outside the iron ball is space for us.
From every infinitesimally small point which theoretically represents the small infinity if we draw a line to the big scale infinity, then there will be infinite number of points in the universe all having same relationship with the big scale infinity. This is the genesis of Quantum Mechanics. There are no fixed positions in this universe and those have to be understood relatively. And when the positions of all material points are relative, then the distances which are nothing but the positions in continuity themselves, become relative. The space itself is then relativistic.
When we bend an iron rod, is it the matter or the space of the rod that is bent?
From the mest point of view the space which is internal to the matter of the rod is bent.
There is no material change in the rod. At the atomic level the rod is what it was before.
The rod has no relation with the space it had occupied before or now. It is a case of matter (rod) into the matter (air).