Is There Someone There?

In general and even in scientific perception and there too, be the approach pure classical or quantized, space surrounds matter. Space exists all around the material objects. Particles and waves move through space. Planets and galaxies revolve around very much in the space. Astronauts take flights to explore the mysteries wrapped there in the envelope of space. Since ages the great scientific minds have put forth astoundingly amazing but true theories all presuming the basic fact that the space is external to the matter. A truncated truth is by no means a lie, at least in science. It remains truth, though truncated.
In the mest theory of everything space is not a medium or a field or a void existing outside of matter. It is very much internal as an inherent property of matter, as much as the mass and the energy. Space is not the play field for mass or energy; it is actually the potential space like potential energy.
Just a humble reminder to the readers, who are not much conversant with the features of the mest theory, I would repeat that we can see only from outside to the outside
and can never see from inside to the outside. This limit of observation for human sight makes space look out side of a material object. To be more precise, we can’t see space leave aside measuring it. What we see and measure is the matter. In other word, space doesn’t exist between one material point and another.
The universe is made of mass/energy over mass/energy over mass/energy, including ourselves, the finest structures of that material. The existence of any material body which is essentially made of mass and energy gives it a spatial dimension in the eyes of an observer again a body of mass and energy. Both, the observer and the observed are submerged into a medium of mass/energy having lesser concentration and hence transparent making the observer able to observe. It is absolutely his misconception that he is observing thru the space. What he understands as spacetime is the property of the transparent mass/energy. This kind of spacetime exists within a wooden block as well though the human eye can’t see through. The observable is the matter not the spacetime.
There is not a theory and nor seems likely to be developed in the future which will be able to establish a mathematical relationship between the mass and the space. As I have said many a time they are related as John is related to his life. What John does with life is exactly the same what his life does with John.
The final challenge for unification theorists will not be as to how gravity falls in line with the rest of the forces, it will actually be the solution of the riddled relationship of mass/energy with spacetime. The only point of their relationship I can see today is the point they meet and create a universal spin, a material-spatial spin.
It sounds little sci-fi to me to say that the spacetime is curved. It is the mass/energy curved over mass-energy. The space time will automatically look curved if we take it as an internal property of the matter. You bend a straight iron rod and will find that the spacetime within the rod is also curved. With the curved light everything what can be observed and is the part of the light will be curved. Why name spacetime separately?
The very idea which made big bang theorists believe that the spacetime ,due to gravity ,was curved to the extent that the universe was like a dot, is like extrapolating a half-truth to a ridiculous extent. While visualizing this kind of universe you can never get rid of the external spacetime and there will be a funny equation between you and your universe. Mass/energy of the universe is merged with the spacetime of the universe. It is not that matter occupies some space to create this universe. What is there, is there. This ‘there’ is the spacetime. Is there someone there to hear what I am saying?
If space was surrounding the matter, it will definitely surround the universe as much. How ridiculous is the thought?
As I have emphasized in my mest theory of everything, there is just one thing and one law.
To say A is equal to B is nothing but dramatic presentation of the simple truth that A is equal to A.