How Inertia Works

[tedjay]

ARTICLE 3

For the benefit of those who might not have read the previous articles, the foundational basis of Zeron Theory is repeated at the beginning of each article (in italics).

HOW INERTIA WORKS

This article reveals the mechanism behind Inertia. To do this in a very short article I am going to start with some models that were more rigorously derived in the original development of the theory. You can get more information by following the link at the end of this article.


The Basic Foundational Model

·There is an Aether. It consists of an all pervasive 'atmosphere' of prime particles called Zerons
· All Zerons are identical, and are totally elastic, frictionless, have inertial mass but zero gravitational mass, and come in two varieties, fast and slow.
·Fast Zerons travel at a velocity of root 2 x c and inter-collide to form a type of Aether which we have named the Cosma. The Cosma is a resonant Perfect Fluid.
·Matter consists of resonating agglomerations of Slow Zerons held together by pressure from the Cosma.
·Matter resonates at a frequency different to that of the Cosma.
·The Zeron constitutes an unimaginably small class of matter and can be shown to have a mass of 7.39 x10p-46 gms compared to an electron mass of 9.11 x 10p-28 gms. There are therefore 1.33 x 10p18 Zerons in an electron!

The Basic Foundational Atom

Consider the hydrogen atom. The Proton nucleus consists of an agglomeration of slow resonating Zerons within the resonant Cosma. Their interaction produces a denser region in the Cosma in the form of a spherical standing wave shell of Zerons. This is the electron shell.
Light emanates from the atom after it is first excited so that the electron shell jumps to the next permissible radius and then collapses to emit an outwardly expanding sphere of light manifested as a series of Zeron impact waves travelling through the Cosma at a velocity c in every direction. If we now accelerate the atom through the Aether the Zeron pressure at the front of the nucleus becomes greater than at the back. This distorts both the nucleus and the electron shell. As soon as the acceleration stops a steady state returns and the atom retains its distorted shape.


The Mechanics of Inertia

The increase of pressure at the front of the atom during acceleration can be explained two ways.

The first is to consult any physics book. Look up the (theoretically derived) properties of Perfect Fluids. These display zero resistance to flow even through very small apertures because they have zero viscosity and lack shear stress. Bodies moving through perfect fluids at constant velocity experience zero drag. Bodies accelerating through perfect fluids do experience drag. This drag is a resistance to acceleration, which we recognise as Inertia.

The other way is to consider that during acceleration there is an ever increasing bunching up of Zerons ahead of the atom and a sloughing off of Zerons at the rear. This means ever more impacts at the front than at the back resulting in an overall force resisting the acceleration. We recognise this force as Inertia.

For inertia to evidence there has to be a dynamic loading up of Zerons in the front and a reduction at the back. As soon as this ratio remains constant, i.e. when acceleration stops, a steady state returns and the distorted atom moves through the Cosma without retardation.

Because Inertia has its own fundamental mechanism it must be added to the list of the forces of nature together with the Strong Nuclear Force, Gravity and the Electro-magnetic force. The electro-weak force falls away in Zeron theory.

In Article 4 I will be presenting the detailed description of Protons Neutrons and Electrons.

If this article has piqued your interest you could go to www.tedjaeckel.com for more information. In Article 4 I will be describing the composition of the atom's component parts.

I hope I have not trodden on too many TOEs. Critique of what is presented here is always welcome.

Ted Jaeckel
(Tedjay)

[Graybeard]

.. by Tedjay ...The other way is to consider that during acceleration there is an ever increasing bunching up of Zerons ahead of the atom and a sloughing off of Zerons at the rear. This means ever more impacts at the front than at the back resulting in an overall force resisting the acceleration. We recognise this force as Inertia.

This is a neat idea Ted. I have a small critique. It may not be one at all, it may just be the way I am reading it.

The Zerons bunch up ahead of the object accelerating , and with less Zerons behind, a pressure or drag builds up in opposition to acceleration.

If they are capable of behaving the way described, why wouldn't they also cause drag with constant velocity. Any movement thru the Zerons must produce drag ??

Are you saying that objects at rest, or constant velocity, produce no drag because they are in motion at the same rate as the Zerons ?? There are many objects at different constant velocities so this cannot hold true either.

Bodies moving through perfect fluids at constant velocity experience zero drag. Bodies accelerating through perfect fluids do experience drag.

I haven't checked the physics books as you suggested. Are you sure the above quote is correct ??

cool bananas ... greg

[tedjay]

This is a neat idea Ted. I have a small critique. It may not be one at all, it may just be the way I am reading it.

The Zerons bunch up ahead of the object accelerating , and with less Zerons behind, a pressure or drag builds up in opposition to acceleration.

If they are capable of behaving the way described, why wouldn't they also cause drag with constant velocity. Any movement thru the Zerons must produce drag ??

Are you saying that objects at rest, or constant velocity, produce no drag because they are in motion at the same rate as the Zerons ?? There are many objects at different constant velocities so this cannot hold true either.

I haven't checked the physics books as you suggested. Are you sure the above quote is correct ??

cool bananas ... greg

Hi Greg,
I must admit that my own family who have read the book have difficulty with this concept. Difficult to explain in concise form but let me try. The Cosma is a completely lossless environment because there is simply no mechanism for losses to incur . Friction or drag would build up heat, but heat is frequency of impact of Zerons. Same applies to impact Zeron on Zeron. Besides which the Cosma transmits light apparently lossely over billions of light years (red-shift excepted??) If a distorted atom travels through the Cosma that's the way its going to stay. Zeron impact front and back are perfectly balanced regardless of movement through the Cosma. If it were not so there would be drag and losses. Not possible in a lossless environment. It is only in a dynamic situation that the front/back balance is disturbed. There's no drag but suddenly there's a bunching of Zerons ahead and a thinning out behind. This process continues for as long as acceleration (a non-steady state) continues.The bunched Zerons make more impacts than the thinned out ones creating a force that resists acceleration. As soon as acceleration stops the steady state and the balance returns.
I have a stone-age book from 'varsity days that derives the properties of perfect fluids theoretically (never did understand it) but there is a much better example. (The following is a quote from my book) To show that these unusual properties and effects do not only exist in the theoretical domain of hydraulics theory, we only need to look at liquid Helium II at 2.7 degrees K. This is a most remarkable liquid, which exhibits all the properties of a perfect fluid including zero resistance to non accelerating flow etc It will flow through the finest of porous materials (apparently without resistance), has no surface tension, has an infinite specific heat, and even has the propensity, in defiance of the laws of gravity, to climb out of open containers, (a property of the fluid that has not yet been explained). Liquid Helium II at 2.7 degrees K is a real-life perfect fluid. It’s a model for the Cosma.
Thanks for the query. I appreciate queries as a means of plugging some of the holes which must exist in such a broad-ranging theory.
Kind regards
Tedjay

[bottomlander]

Bodies moving through perfect fluids at constant velocity experience zero drag. Bodies accelerating through perfect fluids do experience drag.

I haven't checked the physics books as you suggested. Are you sure the above quote is correct ??

greg

The quote is correct. But people cannot find that in internet. I tried several times to surf online for some features, characteristics and concise quotations upon hydrodynamics or fluid dynamics, yet in void.

Really as what Tedjay says, only "stone-age books from university days that derives the properties of perfect fluids theoretically".
Nowadays, no one wrote anymore about those old topics that already be well-theorized and fixed beyond doubts.

Best Regards. Bottomlander

[Graybeard]

I have found some references to SuperFluids on the net and am reading up on them. Helium II is definitely a weird substance.

Thanks for that Ted.

cool bananas ... greg

[MJA]

Dear Ted,

Inertia is absolutely relevant to nature, everything is in motion.
As for zerons, cosma, aether, theorectically derived perfect fluid, C, And CC, I have serious reservations.

What do you believe is the fundamental mechanism of inertia, The Big Bang?

=
MJA

[tedjay]

[quote=MJA;35315]Dear Ted,

Inertia is absolutely relevant to nature, everything is in motion.

Agreed

As for zerons, cosma, aether, theorectically derived perfect fluid, C, And CC, I have serious reservations.

Serious reservations are O.K You don't say why.

What do you believe is the fundamental mechanism of inertia, The Big Bang?

I thought my view of the fundamental mechanism of inertia was the subject of the article. I am sorry if this explanation is not clear but it extremely difficult to truncate such a broad subject from what it is in the book and still cover all the angles. I will be pleased to reply to specific questions.

I do not intend to cover the Big Bang in this series of short articles as this requires a more advanced development of Zeron theory than Î could present in this format.

Kind regards,

Tedjay

[MJA]

Hi Ted,

I am sorry I miss your point or foundation of motion, I'll try again.
I think the foundatiion of enertia is the nature's unity or equaliity.
Simply nature's balancing act(ion).

=
MJA

[tedjay]

Hi Ted,

I am sorry I miss your point or foundation of motion, I'll try again.
I think the foundatiion of enertia is the nature's unity or equaliity.
Simply nature's balancing act(ion).

=
MJA

I agree entirely. What you have stated is the principle of nature's beautiful balance in all things. Its a view that I tend to forget when dealing with the detail of what might make that balance possible.

Kind Regards

Tedjay

[MJA]

Thanks Ted, That was real nice of you to say!

=
MJA