It appears you have not yet registered with our community. To register please click here...

Theory of Everything  

  
Go Back   Theory of Everything > Member Articles > Physics Articles
Reload this Page The Myth of the Photon
Register Website Toe Club Your Blog Arcade

Welcome to the Theory of Everything forums.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact contact us.

Comment
 
LinkBack Article Tools Display Modes
<!-- google_ad_section_start -->The Myth of the Photon<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
The Myth of the Photon
An Aether based model of the Photon shows it is not a particle.
Published by tedjay
10-06-2007
Arrow The Myth of the Photon

ARTICLE 5 OF 9

Note: For the benefit of those who might not have read the previous articles, the foundational basis of Zeron Theory is repeated at the beginning of each article (in italics).


THE MYTH OF THE PHOTON

This article uncovers the myth that the Photon is a particle. To do this in a very short article I am going to start with some models that were more rigorously derived in the original development of the theory. You can get more information by following the link at the end of this article.


The Basic Foundational Model

* There is an Aether. It consists of an all-pervasive 'atmosphere' of prime particles called Zerons
* All Zerons are identical, and are totally elastic, frictionless, have inertial mass but zero gravitational mass, and come in two varieties, fast and slow.
* Fast Zerons travel at a velocity of root 2 x c and inter-collide to form a type of Aether which we have named the Cosma. The Cosma is a resonant Perfect Fluid.
* Matter consists of resonating agglomerations of Slow Zerons held together by pressure from the Cosma.
* Matter resonates at a frequency different to that of the Cosma.
* The Zeron constitutes an unimaginably small class of matter and can be shown to have a mass of 7.39 x10p-46 gms compared to an electron mass of 9.11 x 10p-28 gms. There are therefore 1, 33 x 10p18 Zerons in an electron!


The Basic Foundational Atom

Consider the hydrogen atom. The Proton nucleus consists of an agglomeration of slow resonating Zerons within the resonant Cosma. Their interaction produces a denser region in the Cosma in the form of a spherical standing wave shell of Zerons. This is the electron shell.
Light emanates from the atom after it is first excited so that the electron shell jumps to the next permissible radius and then collapses to emit an outwardly expanding sphere of light manifested as a series of Zeron impact waves travelling through the Cosma at a velocity c in every direction.



This description of light emission, like most things in physics is not quite so simple. Looking back at the Zeron model of the atom, we have a fuzzy looking nucleus encompassed by a radially constrained electron shell. We also found that there are no electrons in this shell. This immediately removes one of physics most enduring problems.

On the assumption that there is a electron doing some sort of jig around the nucleus, Heisenberg, speaking about emission of light from the atom said

"...but this is not supposed to happen with the electron: instead the frequency of vibration of the emitted light is said to lie somewhere between the orbital frequency before the mysterious jump and the orbital frequency after the jump. All this is sheer madness."

The plain fact is that even now there is no convincing model in conventional physics for emission of light from the atom. What an extraordinary situation when one considers the mega-bucks that are spent on physics research each year! We are now going to try and remedy that situation.

Going back to the electron shell, we saw that it is a resonating entity caused by the interaction between a resonating nucleus and a resonating Cosma. A thin shell is formed in which there is superabundance of fast Zerons. Because it's radially constrained the collisions between Zerons are almost entirely tangential. Now we excite this shell by temporarily energising the encompassing Cosma. The shell is now out of synch with the nucleus and the shell has to increase to the next ''permissible'' radius. This radius is obtained by adding one ''de Broglie'' wavelength to the circumference at which point, the shell once more becomes resonant. The Cosma now reverts to its original energy level leaving the shell out of synch once more. What follows is the squeezing of the shell to a smaller radius and a smaller surface area. This means ejecting Zerons, which it does by creating an outwardly traveling Zeron impact waveform consisting of 10p5 to 10p6 tangential oscillations in the form of an expanding shell. We recognise this as light.

So where is the Photon? The short answer is that there isn't one, only a rapidly expanding shell of transverse Zeron on Zeron impact waves. It is important to note that the resonant spherical outwardly expanding light shell does not transport Zerons. The Zerons within the Cosma only serve to pass on the Zeron momentum by means of Zeron-on-Zeron impact. So apart from their normal resonant movement, the Zerons in the Cosma remain, on average, sensibly where they were as the spherical light wave passes though. However, if the positions of individual Zerons were to be monitored, it would be found that if the normal resonant movement is averaged out or ignored, all the affected Zerons will travel on average one "pitch" (the average distance between two Zerons in the Cosma) per oscillation of the light wave. At the end of the line, when the wave-packet hits a particle detector or another particle, the foremost Zeron in line dumps its kinetic energy and so does each of the subsequent Zerons as they travel one pitch and collide with the body at which they are aimed. The aggregate of the transfer of momentum for the entire wave train is what is recognized as the energy of a photon and is detected as the dynamic impact of photon ''particles''. The rapid "machine gun" impact of Zerons is fast enough to be, in effect, an instantaneous event in the life of a comparatively much more massive electron or other particle. The particle behaves as though it has been hit by a particle whose mass is equivalent to the sum of the Zerons that have impacted on it.
The surprising conclusion from this model is that that there is actually no such thing as a photon! As in the case of the electron, the ''photon'' will form in any experiment designed to detect photon particles. Only a piece of apparatus built to detect photons will detect these as light "particles". This is equivalent to determining the position of a photon. All other light detecting equipment will measure the movement of a traveling waveform and the particle will not be perceived to coalesce. This is equivalent to measuring the "momentum of a photon". Thus the Uncertainty Principle is once more upheld but in a way that Heisenberg could never have imagined! It's either a wave with momentum or a perceived particle with position not a property-deficient Photon. This model as we saw previously also solves the particle/wave duality problem as typified by Young's double slit experiment and its derivatives.

If this article has piqued your interest you could go to www.tedjaeckel.com for more information. In Article 6 I will be revealing the meaning of Planck's Constant and describing how the mass of the Zeron was derived.

I hope I have not trodden on too many TOEs. Critique of what is presented here is always welcome.

Ted Jaeckel
(Tedjay)
Latest 5 articles

Article Tools

Featured Articles
Read more
THE 1984 WAR: A War of Perception

A Conquest of the United States
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
 
By mkirkpatrick on 10-06-2007, 09:33 AM
Smile Re: The Myth of the Photon

Thanks Tedjay,great article,what power there is in prediction?



regards michael.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #1 (permalink)  
By tedjay on 10-06-2007, 12:47 PM
Re: The Myth of the Photon

Quote:
Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick View Post
Thanks Tedjay,great article,what power there is in prediction?



regards michael.
Thanks Michael
It's amazing how just writing these short articles has clarified my own thinking! The next article is a cracker because it hauls Zeron theory out of the purely speculative into the quantifiable. For me discovering the meaning of Planck's
Constant and deriving the mass of the Zeron was the breakthrough I needed to give me confidence to publish a book.
Kind Regards
Ted
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
By mkirkpatrick on 10-06-2007, 12:57 PM
Smile Re: The Myth of the Photon

Quote:
Originally Posted by tedjay View Post
Thanks Michael
It's amazing how just writing these short articles has clarified my own thinking! The next article is a cracker because it hauls Zeron theory out of the purely speculative into the quantifiable. For me discovering the meaning of Planck's
Constant and deriving the mass of the Zeron was the breakthrough I needed to give me confidence to publish a book.
Kind Regards
Ted
I wish you the very best on your forthcoming book,I will have to save up so that I
can purchase a copy!


warm regards michael.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
By Bob Campbell on 11-06-2007, 04:29 AM
Re: The Myth of the Photon

Your article is interesting, especially the part about the photon not being a particle. Personally I have trouble with theories based on concepts that can never be confirmed in phenomenal experience of any kind. No matter how much they claim to portray some aspects of some phenomena, they inevitably lack the capacity to apply universally. So please don't take this criticism as applying only to your theory. I find it difficult to believe that fast and slow zerons can be known in phenomenal experience, just as it is difficult to believe that time or space can ever be known as independent entities. The latter are at least known a posteriori to creation, but they are then elevated to a priori status to explain their own creation, which to my mind is just intellectual bootstrapping run amuck. Your article implicitly assumes that space and time are continuous, but there is no evidence that there is a spacetime continuum or that either or both of space and time are continuous. Planck's constant has a solid basis in experience and it strongly indicates that space and time are discontinuous.

But are photons really particles? There is lots of evidence that they surely exist as fundamental and discrete quanta of energy, but this does not make them hard little particles like a free electron or proton. Photon quanta are directly associated with Planck's constant. This strongly suggests that atoms are synchronously projected as a discontinuous series of still space frames that interrupt the electromagnetic spectrum across its entire breadth. All particle motion is a series of quantum jumps between successive space frames in the integrated fabric of space-time. The uncertainty principle necessarily follows. The only activity within each integrated space frame is that of light.

Since all light originates from within atoms, this can only mean that light itself defines space in relation to each individual atom. This is why the speed of light is universal. The only convincing evidence for light as a solid particle outside the atom is the neutrino and it is a particle remnant of neutron decay.

When confined subjectively within the atom, light behaves in a way orthogonal to its linear external projection. It defines the spherical dimensions of the whole atom, shell by shell, up to the ionization limit. In this respect photonic energy defines a solid atomic particle but only as intimately bound with electron and proton partners within the atom in a very specific way.

The number of de Broglie waves in an electron orbit is a direct function of the number of space frame jumps required to complete each orbit, since there is no particulate motion within a space frame. It can be shown that the number of such orbital waves as jumps is n cubed where n is the number of the orbit.

In this approach, atoms themselves are the fundamental building blocks of the universe from which space and time derive. In fact these structures and processes derive as a necessary requirement of universal wholeness. There is much more about this at www.cosmic-mindreach.com if you are interested. There is no need to invent arbitrary structures that can only vaguely be imagined and never detected, or to make self-contradictory conjectures about space and time.

Best regards,
Bob
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
By theunify on 11-06-2007, 07:15 AM
Re: The Myth of the Photon

This may be worthwhile if we can resolve the space/mass ratio we are currently exhibiting in real-time, otherwise there is no scale of comparison from which I can imagine a particle being composed of rapidly expanding waves, and not having a centre.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
By Bob Campbell on 11-08-2007, 12:01 AM
Re: The Myth of the Photon

Quote:
Originally Posted by theunify View Post
This may be worthwhile if we can resolve the space/mass ratio we are currently exhibiting in real-time, otherwise there is no scale of comparison from which I can imagine a particle being composed of rapidly expanding waves, and not having a centre.
Hi theunify,

I do not see that there is any fixed mass/space ratio in the universe. A hydrogen atom has certain fixed maximum dimensions beyond which the electron is ejected as a free electron beyond the ionization limit. This is known. Each whole atom is discontinuous, transforming back and forth from a physical form in each space frame into timeless and formless quantized energy equivalents in quantum frames between space frames. So the light ejected from atoms can only travel a fixed distance in each primary interval of time defined by one space frame. A primary interval of time can readily be calculated from the fact that the angular momentum of the electron in the first hydrogen orbit MUST be zero. This primary interval of time in 1.519x10 to the minus 16th power. This is what makes light transmission a quantum of photonic energy. Both space and time are quantized. Light transmission is thus not continuous, but since the quantum frames are timeless the space frames close ranks to give the impression of continuity. It is in this way that light defines space. It has a specific relationship to each atom in the universe. Its speed is universal. And where there is no light there is a black hole in space.

But the atomic fusion processes in stars condense space. One atom of helium occupies less volume than one atom of hydrogen even though it is the fusion product of two atoms of hydrogen, and so on up through the heavier elements. But light in defining space has a universal relationship to each atom, regardless of its atomic mass. So there is no universal requirement for a fixed mass-space ratio.

I dont know what you mean by a particle being formed by rapidly expanding waves and not having a center. I agree that a photon is not like a particle in its transmission that defines space. It is simply quantized.

Regards,
Bob
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
By tedjay on 11-22-2007, 11:19 AM
Re: The Myth of the Photon

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Campbell View Post
Your article is interesting, especially the part about the photon not being a particle. Personally I have trouble with theories based on concepts that can never be confirmed in phenomenal experience of any kind. No matter how much they claim to portray some aspects of some phenomena, they inevitably lack the capacity to apply universally.

I suppose I was expecting this type of response when I first started to break Zeron theory into bite size bits. There's really no substitute for reading the whole logic sequence. So let me try to paint a bigger picture. I recently went through the text of the theory and highlighted and counted outcomes flowing out of the theory. Of the 94 outcomes, about one third gave good fits to key historical experiments and equations. The remainder were novel outcomes that solve many of the outstanding mysteries of physics. The evidence is strongly in support of the objective reality of Zerons, the Cosma and the theory as a whole.
However I do not expect to receive much support from the many contributors to these forums. Objective reality seems not to feature strongly and the theories I have read seem to be more philosophical than practical.

To illustrate the great gulf that exists between Zeron theory and what I find here, perhaps a few definitions might be helpful.

Space:
Space is what I live in, what the universe exists in, and it has three dimensions. It is nothing more complicated than that. How formed, how big, how constant or how continuous concerns me not, because these unanswerable questions do not affect Zeron theory.

Time:
Time is an abstract dimensionless human construct devoid of any properties. It lives in the minds of men who perceive it to be the interval between two events and the unit of time to be an empirical proportion of the interval between two events.

Simplistic as these definitions may seem, they are realistic and they permit the unification in physics in an unusual but objectively real manner. However this puts paid to concepts like space-time which seems to have its origins in Einstein's efforts to incorporate gravity into General Relativity.



I find it difficult to believe that fast and slow zerons can be known in phenomenal experience, just as it is difficult to believe that time or space can ever be known as independent entities.

I do not understand how time and space can ever be known as anything other than independent entities. To consider them to be non-independent can only arise from some or other assumption about the nature of the big bang. Seeing that any such assumption must, de facto, be unknown, I think that the coupling of space and time stands on very shaky foundations.

There is no evidence that there is a spacetime continuum or that either or both of space and time are continuous. Planck's constant has a solid basis in experience and it strongly indicates that space and time are discontinuous.

I do not understand the concept of a discontinuous space or time. Do these have any physical meaning?

Your article implicitly assumes that space and time are continuous, but there is no evidence that there is a spacetime continuum or that either or both of space and time are continuous. Planck's constant has a solid basis in experience and it strongly indicates that space and time are discontinuous.


As regards Plank's constant I have identified this constant as being the energy of a fast Zeron. The equation is
.
h =z c^2

where h is Plank's constant, z = mass of a Zeron and c = the speed of light. That is the objectively real description of Plank's constant.



There is no need to invent arbitrary structures that can only vaguely be imagined and never detected, or to make self-contradictory conjectures about space and time.


Best regards,
Bob



I suppose I could go on and reply to each of the points you have made but I fear the gulf is too large to bridge.


Kind Regards

Tedjay
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit!
Reply With Quote
Comment



Currently Active Users Viewing This Article: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Article Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new articles
You may not post comments
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
vBulletin Skin developed by: vBStyles.com

Article powered by GARS 2.1.8m ©2005-2006