| <!-- google_ad_section_start -->"redshift" A Different Approach<!-- google_ad_section_end -->
The myth of Einstein’s gravitational “red-shifts”.
“Red-shifting” is said to be an increase of wavelength observed by an observer as the (light’s) source moves away from it or vice versa.
I agree with the referred observation but I disagree with the explanation.
A source of light composed of various wavelengths (components of light) will always change the original spectrum design as the light moves across the eather.
According to what I expressed in this forum under the name of “Theory of Bonding Harmonics”, I proposed a theory that all wavelengths (of electro-magnetic nature) will always synchronize their “4 frames.” Electronic harmonics –for example- will orbit atoms at the same rate of spin no matter the diameter of the orbit in question.
A light wave “moving” through the eather will “click” in each FRAME at the same time [no matter the frequency of the component wavelength of the light]. However, the longer the wavelength of the component wave, the FASTER THE COMPONENT WILL “DISPLACE ITSELF” ACROSS SPACE (!) causing a displacement of the spectrum toward the lower energy waves or what’s the same toward the longer wavelength spectrum.
Stars are not necessarily “moving away” from us just because we keep observing a so-called “red-shifting” of the light coming from them… We will always receive the longer wavelength before those with larger wavelength no matter what… If my thesis is right, then the believed “Doppler effect” proving that the universe is expanding away from us is totally WRONG.
The difference between sounf and electro-magnetic waves is obvious and the known "Dopler Effect" is aplicable only to sound waves and not to electromagnetic ones.
The emission of a neutrino and the "shifting" observed in its nature according to the actual distance in space confirms my theory.
The "redshift" said to be proved in the university of Harvard only brings evidence that the first wavelength that "hit" the light detecting sensors (located in the top of a tower) was the longer one and in no time that showed evidence of a decrease in energy of the light coming from the source on the ground.
THIS BRINGS US TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THE SPEED OF "FRAMES-SHIFTING" OF ALL E-M WAVE WILL ALWAYS BE THE SAME HOWEVER THE "SPEED OF LIGHT" WILL DEPEND AND THEREFORE VARY ACCORDING TO THE WAVELENGTH OF THE LIGHT RAY USED IN THE MEASUREMENT (!)
THAT'S THE MOST IMPORTANT CONCLUSION DERIVED FROM MY PROPOSAL: "c" IS NO LONGER ONE FOR LIGHT... It's actual measurement will always depend on the particular wavelength of the light employed in the measurement. Since the TIME variation is so small it may have been missed so far or blamed on experimental aproximations.
HUMANBYDEFAULT
|  Latest 5 articles | | |
Article Tools | | |
Featured Articles | | | |  | |
Linear Mode
