<< <    Next Page: Framework (Page 1 of 6)    >  >>

Thanks Analog,unification is what we all need,there is much to take in,will get back to you,
Once again thank you for presenting your work here.


regards michael.

Thanks for the reply.

Hi, I haven't posted here for at least a year, but I'm intrigued by many of your points. So what we probably know is that the universe consists of many particles of matter/energy at varying proximities from one another. Is there maybe a Universal Frequency at which the forces of attraction and repulsion lock particles into orbit of one another, which then allows for the formation of more complex arrangements of those same particles of energy? For something keeps orbiting structures from collapsing into one another and from flying apart. Maybe these things have reached this frequency.

Hello edwin,

First, let me thank you for your interest in my ideas. My attempt here is to investigate building a world without any kind of energy or it's implications, such as charge, attraction, repulsion, etc.

My use of the word orbit is a poor choice on my part. It creates the picture of a particle traveling around something else, which would need energy to explain, and that's not what I'm trying to convey. A better term would possibly be, area of disturbance. All that is within this "orbit" is one particle, which collides with other particles at different angles along it's outer edges as it only travels in straight lines, whereby mostly spherical areas of disturbance are formed.

For me not to admit to energy, which is how modern thinking describes the world being held together, I had to replace it with a characteristic of matter I refer to as absolute motion. Energy is the creation used to try to explain the world being held together. I try to explain all things, that we think are being held together, as actually the natural result of motion, as it forms more complex arrangements.

When viewing the origin of a system with energy, we naturally rewind it to a singularity, such as the "big bang". This is a natural path of logic. I am unsure if there ever was such a beginning, but to do the same with my system would be to rewind it to what I would call a type of inverted "big bang". Rather than a spatial expansion or explosion, it would be better viewed as a retraction or implosion of particles of matter, as they go from the symmetry of equal spacing throughout the void of space, to our current view of asymmetrical proximities that currently form our universe. I replace the singularity from the "big bang" with vast amounts of particles at equal spacing from each other (absolute symmetry) as they occupy all of the void of space. The only thing between them is the void of space. When given absolute motion they begin to propagate, which inevitably leads to collisions with each other at varying space/time positions. These collisions continuously take place in less and less time and distances, thus higher frequency, as they loose ground before hitting another. The first visible result of this would be a galaxy. As this continues, stars form within galaxies, and sometimes planets around stars.

The symmetrical flow is inward towards the center of a massive body, such as a planet. This allows for the observation of apparent "energy", being as the proportions of the whole system is maintained by interactions at certain space/time positions, by altering one collision, you cause a whiplash throughout the whole system at the universal max speed limit of a particle, as all of the particles must adjust their near equilibrium due to symmetrical flow. We observe this as electromagnetism, and the inward flow, mentioned above, causes gravity. There is also no need for the strong force due to how all this works.

When we look at a planet in this system, we are recognizing it's increasingly collision dense center as the frequencies of the particles lessen as you travel outward from the center, but the visible edge of the planet doesn't represent where these interactions stop, such as it would with a system built around "energy". The varying collision density continues to travel outward into space and it just isn't dense enough for us to see anymore. It passes the threshold of our vision capabilities. The darkness of space between all massive cosmic bodies (planets, stars, etc.) is full of particles with collision densities proportional to the density of all of the cosmic bodies on all sides of it. This is how cosmic bodies interact at such long distances.

Let me know if this helps.

Re: Creation by Collision
auth: Jon Woodward cc: Toequest@WWW


Welcome to Toequest my friend, I see your theory becoming a good reflection of reality.

~theunify

Thanks for the welcome, and your words of encouragement. They mean a lot to me.

Just letting everyone know that I've added some new pages to my article lately and one today. The last of which is "From the Micro to the Macro" which better describes my ideas of the structure of matter and how that relates to planetary motions. Thanks for viewing.