| Introduction
“REDISCOVERING THE ATOMIC Model” – by M. De Zayas
“Inside yourself or outside, you never have to change what you see, only the way you see it.” [Thaddeus Golas]
Q - Is the atom made up of “subatomic particles” with names like “protons,” “neutrons,” and “electrons” among many others?
A - False!
Q - Aren’t “protons,” “neutrons,” and “electrons” independently existent particles, spinning around each other inside the atom?
A - False!
Q - Would you willing to die for your believes?
A - Yes your Excellency… I would!
Q- Had the jury made from the 12 representatives of the supreme “Standard Model” reached a final decision?
A - Yes Sr.! “The accused is found guilty of the charges of conspiracy to eliminate the sacred concept of “particleness!” “The accused is also found guilty of creating a new model of the atom where no particles had the right to co-exists…” [Loud protests and screaming of “death sentence!”]
“Order! Silence in the courtroom”! – Then the judge “cracked the nutshell” and pronounced the final verdict:
“It is the verdict of this court to send you [M. De Zayas] to prison indefinitely! You would have the right to file an appeal against the present sentence with the decay of the first proton!”
“God had mercy on your soul!”
There were no “subatomic” particles inside the atoms before and it will never be any ever!
My vision of the atomic structure is entirely different in relation to the present orthodox models and I know the consequences of following that course of action, but hey! Ten years from now whoever dared to mention that atoms were actually made by a bunch of non-related disconnected and coincidentally co-existing group of “particles” will be seen as delusional human being… I think he or she deserves it!
Being said that, I believe I could save us some time by giving you a version of my vision.
I begun saying in one of my first articles that in the genesis of the universe pure radiation energy [the only one existent] found the way to survive through time by merging or fusing together in a more stable configuration: the atom.
Now, the atom was made of mass and energy… That’s easy! The difference between my model and theirs is how to explain the particular roll and relationship that characterize such “association.”
I mentioned that at some point in time in the evolution of the universe infinitesimally small specks of radiation energy were “forced” to interact each other in a very familiar pattern we know as “standing waves.” The interference of [quantized] propagating waves from each speck of radiation allowed both interacting “partners” to reach a more stable and lower state of energy configuration inside the “new system.”
Before I start talking [I’d rather say writing instead] about mass and matter I would like to finish with energy first… That is, if you don’t have any further objection.
The popular physical pattern of “standing waves” is no doubts about it a spinning one. I don’t know if you have tried before to follow the phenomenon at the area called “anti-node,” in case you haven’t, I suggest you to try it… You’ll see it! No big deal!
Standing waves have demonstrated to account for similarities with respect to forces like gravity and magnetism among many others, and there is a very good reason for that. The decrease of the levels of energy in “assumed electrons” with respect to the proportional increase in the distance [ratio] from the nucleus of the atom seems to fit pretty well in the picture of the mentioned pattern of interference.
If my memory does not betray me, I believe it was precisely the analogy with “standing waves” that a French physicist with the name Louis De Broglie (1892-1987) utilized to provide an “exit strategy” from the classical model of the époque. As you recall, any “particle” would definitely lose its energy while spinning during its angular momentum around the atomic nucleus, therefore something had to be found to justify such [undeniable] paradox.
That was the day “particles” became also waves… In other words I would say that those angels also got their wins although no one heard bells at the time.
Today is a fact that [at least in its own configuration] the pattern of “standing waves” is present in the so-called “electronic orbits.”
Hundred years ago, officially I may add, Albert Einstein submitted two papers to the Prussian academy. One of them was carrying an equation that made him an idol for years to come. The simple equation portrayed energy in one part of the equation while mass was located in the other side. He had a revelation a previous night as he walked along with his best friend, Besso: “mass and energy were interchangeable in nature.”
Einstein knew that if matter absorbed energy its mass would increase in a certain direct proportions. So, he made the connection that as he said “both expand and shrink in the same way.”
With all due respect, I think he saw mass as some sort of a “rubber gum” that it could expand itself to the infinite while trying to catch up with the speed of light… sort of.
Since I was convicted for a crime earlier in my attempts to exile once and forever the concept of “particleness” from the physics dictionary, I have no other choice but to deny what one of the scientists that I have admired my entire life said in 1905.
I know! I must be crazy and on top of that stupid too, but I could not keep quiet and swallow my own convictions because of that. In fact, I would think that Einstein himself would be against any personal decision preventing me from publishing my own opinions and views even if they happened to disagree with his on any aspect.
I consider the existence of mass [dust] in the universe as infinitesimally small specks of “universal ash” present in the vacuum. Mass is inert in nature and incapable of holding any charges whatsoever. According to my atomic model, the sole roll of mass in this universe is to “fill the blanks” after the cancellation of interacting energy waves on space.
|  Contents | | |
Latest 5 articles | | |
Article Tools | | |
Featured Articles | | | |  | |
Linear Mode
