+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

  1. #1
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    “Call me the luckiest numerologist in the ‘Physical’ World!”

    You won’t believe your own eyes when you see it!

    This is the exact (literal) copy of the square root of 2 from Wikipedia:

    1.41421 35623 73095 04880 16887 24209 69807 85696 71875 37694 80731 76679 73799.... No kidding!

    Check that out at:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square_root_of_2

    I will separate each E.R.P.s (fractions made up equal number of decimals representing a secret code for Reality) just as they were presented on the official site:

    (41421) (35623) (73095) (04880) (16887) (24209) (69807) (85696) (71875) (37694) (80731) (76679) and… (73799)!

    Let’s calculate the “Mirror Value” according to my ‘Object-Image’ conversion procedure:

    (41421) = (4 + 1 + 4 + 2 + 1) = 12!
    (35623) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 3) = 9!
    (73095) = (2 + 3 + 0 + 4 + 0) = 9!
    (04880) = (0 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 0) = 10!
    (16887) = (1 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 2) = 10!
    (24209) = (2 + 4 + 2 + 0 + 4) = 12!
    (69807) = (1 + 4 + 3 + 0 + 2) = 10!
    (85696) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 4 + 1) = 9!
    (71875) = (2 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 0) = 8!
    (37694) = (3 + 2 + 1 + 4 + 4) = 14!
    (80731) = (3 + 0 + 2 + 3 + 1) = 9!
    (76679) = (2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4) = 10!
    (73799) = (2 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 4) = 15!

    Now! Pay attention to the result obtained by a simple arithmetical addition:
    12 + 9 + 9 + 10 + 10 + 12 + 10 + 9 + 8 + 14 + 9 + 10 + 15 = 137!!!!!!!!!

    GOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLL!

    GOOOOOOOOAAAAAAAAAAAAALLLLLLL!

    I DID IT BEFORE AND I DO IT AGAIN! IF YOU RECALL FROM MY BASIC MODEL OF REALITY I SUCCEDED FINDING ALPHA BY ADDING UP THE ‘SETS OF COORDINATES’ OBTAINED WHILE MULTIPLYING THE SQUARE ROOT OF 2 BY CONSECUTIVE NUMBERS (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 AND 0) AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT PROCEDURE UNDER A PURELY EMPIRICAL LENS. THIS TIME I TOOK THE ‘OFFICIAL’ NUMBERS POSTED FOR PUBLIC RECORDS BY THE MOST POPULAR AND VISITED SITE IN THE WHOLE WORLD [THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF THE INTERNET] AND I FOUND WHAT “NO MEN HAS FOUND BEFORE!”

    IF YOU WAS NOT CONVINCED OF MY NUMERICAL SYSTEM BEFORE I THINK IT’S TIME TO RECONSIDER YOUR POSITION BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE…

    MIGUEL DE ZAYAS_AUTHOR OF THE BOOK “PHYSIMATICS” (Speaking the Language of Numbers).
    GOD BLESS YOU.

    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  2. #2
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    Let's cancel out the "Mirror Values" that repeat in the following table containing the E.R.P.s obtained from the Square Root of 2:

    (41421) (35623) (73095) (04880) (16887) (24209) (69807) (85696) (71875) (37694) (80731) (76679) and… (73799)!


    (41421) = (4 + 1 + 4 + 2 + 1) = 12!
    (35623) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 3) = 9!
    (73095) = (2 + 3 + 0 + 4 + 0) = 9!
    (04880) = (0 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 0) = 10!
    (16887) = (1 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 2) = 10!
    (24209) = (2 + 4 + 2 + 0 + 4) = 12!
    (69807) = (1 + 4 + 3 + 0 + 2) = 10!
    (85696) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 4 + 1) = 9!
    (71875) = (2 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 0) = 8!
    (37694) = (3 + 2 + 1 + 4 + 4) = 14!
    (80731) = (3 + 0 + 2 + 3 + 1) = 9!
    (76679) = (2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4) = 10!
    (73799) = (2 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 4) = 15!


    2 pieces of 12s, 4 pieces of 9s and 4 pieces of 10s! OUT!

    What's left?

    8 + 14 + 15 = 37!

    Do you know what prime number corresponds to 37? It is the 12th prime! 12 = (1 + 2) = 3! (The number of dimensions in our Reality)

    12 also means (7) + (5) Where Reality is made up of seven "musical notes" (colors) and a fraction that projects itself ahead in time by half cycle. (5).

    8 + 14 + 15 = (3) + (5) + (6) = 14! A complete cycle made of 2 x 7!
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  3. #3
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    "PHYSIMATICS" IS NOW AVAILABLE (FREE DOWNLOAD) FOR E-BOOKS LOVERS! (at lulu)

    By clicking at this link you can get it at no cost:

    http://www.lulu.com/product/ebook/physimatics/11909034

    "Be there or be 'squared'! (Like number 2)

    I've got the latest confirmation of Alpha not published yet anywhere:

    If you count how many 'image-object' conversions were done in the total of 65 decimals corresponding to the official numbers representing the Square Root of 2 you get the total of 39!

    If you count how many decimals were already in their 'object configuration' with no need for conversion you get the total of 26!

    So let's resume what we have:

    65 = total decimals in the Square Root of 2.

    39 = conversions from "Image" into "Object"

    26 = numbers originally in their "Object configuration".

    So... (65) (26) (39) = (6) (5) >< [(2) + (1)] (5) >< [(3) + (4)] (5)!

    (1) (3) (7) = 137!!! Since 6 was converted into 1 (-5) and 5 was converted into 0 in 65 there is a balance of 10 which cancels out the two pieces of (5) corresponding to (3) and (7)!

    There is nothing arbitrary done in my calculations. If someone is not capable of seen it (after all the proper explanations were offered) is not my fault. I don't say:

    "Shut up and calculate!" I show you the basic rules, I take you through each calculations and I explain why was something done according to what rule...

    Some blind people see without their physical eyes while others refuse to admit it even in front of their very eyes...

    HBD
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  4. #4
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    I will give you yet another evidence that when numbers "talk" they do until someone is willing and capable of listening to them:

    Check this out!

    "...If you count how many 'image-object' conversions were done in the total of 65 decimals corresponding to the official numbers representing the Square Root of 2 you get the total of 39!

    If you count how many decimals were already in their 'object configuration' with no need for conversion you get the total of 26!

    So let's resume what we have:

    65 = total decimals in the Square Root of 2.

    39 = conversions from "Image" into "Object"

    26 = numbers originally in their "Object configuration"..." (End of quote from above).

    Now I'm going to display those numbers in correct order of quantity...

    26 and 39 and 65! Correct?

    Now let's "read" what they say:

    26 is (6) (2)

    39 is (3) (9) and...

    (5) (6)! = (5) (6)!

    It gives us (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)!

    As you see the first (6) becomes (1) because (1) + (5) = (6)!

    However... since (9) becomes (4) because (9 - 5) = (4)!

    (+5) cancels out with (-5) correct? Of course!

    But what 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 mean?

    Well let's "read" them again, shall we?

    I will take (1) and (3) from the top...

    (1)! and (3)! and left are (2 + 4 + 5 + 6)

    Where {2 + 4 + [(5) + [6 - 5] or [5 +1]} = (2 + 4 + 1) =

    (7)!!!

    because (+5) and (-5) cancel each other out!

    So! The winner is... 137 again!

    See how easy is to read numbers when you opwn your mind to the task?

    If we ad up 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 we get 21! which is also 3! (2 + 1) the number of dimensions and the mirror value of "c" (the speed of light).

    Adding the images of them (6, 7, 8, 9, 10 and 11) we obtain 51! which also means 6!
    (5 +1)!

    Dividing 51/21 we obtain a ratio and the ratio is the same "lucky trios" I've been publishing in all my books including "Physimatics"...

    51/21 = 2.4 (285) (714) where 2.4 is (2 + 4) = 6!

    I found (285) and (714) embedded inside the "Coupling constant" a long while ago.

    What is the Physical interpretation of what I've just done?


    Simple! If 21 (3) represents Alpha in this analysis and (6) represents a complete cycle [3 x 2] what we have just obtained was the actual empirical value of the "Perturbation"
    resulting from the missing of "one note" (two semi-tones) after each cycle.


    The same experimental results observed by Goethe and exactly the same phenomenon causing Music to lose two semitones (Between "Mi-Fa" and between "Si-Do").


    After each octave elapses (in one complete cycle) we observe a perturbation (-1) lost in space-time! (825) and (714) are the empirical value of that progression.

    Relativity is inherent to our Reality the problem is that we only become aware of this fact when it is too obvious not to. Only a comprehensive atom theory based on these conclusions will allow us to build a correct "Periodic Table" for the Elements.


    Numbers do talk! We should listen to what they say if we want to find the "Theory of Everything" one of these days.

    HBD
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  5. #5
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    “Don’t tell me that this is ‘Numerology’ too!”

    Go to: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table and make the count yourselves!

    Adding up the “Z” (Atomic numbers) of the Elements corresponding to the group 1 (where Hydrogen leads on top) and doing exactly the same procedure in group 18 (where Helium leads on top of the group) we obtain:

    For group 1:

    1 + 3 + 11 + 19 + 37 + 55 + 87 = 213!

    For group 18:

    2 + 10 + 18 + 36 + 54 + 86 + 118 = 324!

    Now let’s divide each by 7! The total number of periods in the periodic table and also the number of “musical notes” left after the cancellation of ‘two semitones’:

    324/7 = 46. 285 714! Recognize the “lucky trio here?

    Let’s do the same with the result from the first group:

    213/7 = 30. 4 285 71! The same (285) (714)!

    Let’s see the difference in the whole side of the numbers:

    46 – 30 = 16! Of course! The ratio between 18 and 1 is 16!

    Make the count: 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17!

    It ad up 16 if you do the count correctly.

    We have found Alpha’s decimal message again!

    137.035… 1/.035 = 28. 571428 or (285) (714) (28]…!

    Do you think I’m a (lucky) Magician or someone using Common Sense?

    What do you believe?

    HBD
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  6. #6
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    "Let's cancel out the "Mirror Values" that repeat in the following table containing the E.R.P.s obtained from the Square Root of 2:

    (41421) (35623) (73095) (04880) (16887) (24209) (69807) (85696) (71875) (37694) (80731) (76679) and… (73799)!


    (41421) = (4 + 1 + 4 + 2 + 1) = 12!
    (35623) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 2 + 3) = 9!
    (73095) = (2 + 3 + 0 + 4 + 0) = 9!
    (04880) = (0 + 4 + 3 + 3 + 0) = 10!
    (16887) = (1 + 1 + 3 + 3 + 2) = 10!
    (24209) = (2 + 4 + 2 + 0 + 4) = 12!
    (69807) = (1 + 4 + 3 + 0 + 2) = 10!
    (85696) = (3 + 0 + 1 + 4 + 1) = 9!
    (71875) = (2 + 1 + 3 + 2 + 0) = 8!
    (37694) = (3 + 2 + 1 + 4 + 4) = 14!
    (80731) = (3 + 0 + 2 + 3 + 1) = 9!
    (76679) = (2 + 1 + 1 + 2 + 4) = 10!
    (73799) = (2 + 3 + 2 + 4 + 4) = 15!


    2 pieces of 12s, 4 pieces of 9s and 4 pieces of 10s! OUT!

    What's left?

    8 + 14 + 15 = 37!

    Do you know what prime number corresponds to 37? It is the 12th prime!" [end of quote from above]



    Let's remind you that the numbers cancelling out on that previous calculation added up to 100 or ten complete cycles!


    Let's divide 100/21 = 4. 7619047 where (7619047) = (2 + 1 + 1 + 4 + 0 + 4 + 2) = 14!


    If you take (4) and (761) you obtain 761 x 761 x 761 x 761 (four times) = 25522418 = (2 + 2 + 2 + 4 + 1 + 3) = 14!


    Dividing 12/37 = 0. 324 324 324... 12 is the prime number corresponding to 37 and as you already know 37 was the numbers left from the massive cancellation inside the Square Root of 2.


    But what is 324?


    It is THE sum of all "Z" (Atomic number) in the 'Periodic Table of the Elements' corresponding to Group 16! The last group containning the Noble Gases...

    This is a good one!

    If we divide 100/37 = 2. 702 702 7... Which means as you now know 702 twice.

    702 x 702 = 492804 = (4 + 4 + 2 + 3 + 0 + 4) = 17! The same mirror value obtained for Plank's constant!

    Then let's divide the number represented by 37 in its prime configuration (12):

    100/12 = 8.3333333... Multiplying 3 by itself eight times: 19683!

    Let's see what it means:

    (1 + 4 + 6 + 3 + 3) = 17! The same thing! The same result!

    See it? I want you to realize that you can convert down from 'images' to 'objects' in paired only keeping the concept of ten-cycle always. Reference is the key!

    That's why I left 6 without conversion upthere. You could have left 9 or 8 instead but the result would have been the same!

    Never ever convert numbers in an odd fashion.

    As you see I converted the digits inside the Square Root of 2 39 times remember?

    That means that I had to change the sign of the result giving me the final number of:

    -137 or 1/137! I believe this one is the correct figure of Alpha...

    Are you still with me?



    What a small universe this is...

    HBD
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  7. #7
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    “The ultimate prove of my numerical analysis”

    “THE HIDDEN SYMMETRY OF ALPHA”

    I will demonstrate that Alpha carries an “encrypted message” only interpretable by using my ‘Mirror Analysis” and the fundaments of what I chose to name ‘Physimatics’ (Speaking the language of numbers).
    This is Alpha according to CODATA 2006:

    7. 297 352 537 6 (50) x 10-3

    The text that follows this constant published in Wikipedia reads:

    “However, after the 2006 CODATA adjustment was completed, an error was discovered in one of the main data inputs Nevertheless, the 2006 CODATA recommended value was republished in 2008. A revised standard value, taking recent research and adjustments to SI units into account, is expected to be published in 2010 or early in 2011.” (Wikipedia 2010)

    Those already familiar with my system know that the whole number to the left of the decimal point will tell us how many times the first E.R.P. (located to the right of the same decimal point) must be multiplied by itself to obtain the correct result and final solution to the fraction. It has been always the case in every single demonstration performed so far as it is in no case an arbitrary operation at all.

    I have those numbers ready for you now, let’s watch it:

    The first E.R.P. = 297!

    I will give you the product obtained as I multiplied it by itself seven times. (One thing though, I don’t have a scientific calculator at my disposal which forced me to approximate the step-by-step solutions… If anyone in this forum reading my work owns one, please let me know the results you could come up with).

    297 x 297 = 88209
    88209 x 297 = 26198
    26198 x 297 = 77808
    77808 x 297 = 23108
    23108 x 297 68630
    68630 x 297 20383
    20383 x 297 = 6053751!
    6053751 = 605 371 (5) = 6 (50) 137 (5)!

    If you take a look back to the original CODATA number you’ll find 6 (50) as part of their calculation for Alpha. Then left are 137 and (5) meaning half-cycle ahead in time and change of sign. You could also interpret (5) + (1) = (6) 637 = -137! Since 6 is the image of 1!

    The second important factor in the final result 60 537 51 is the E.R.P. in the middle: 537. It is also part of the CODATA CONSTANT:

    7. 297 352 537 6 (50) x 10-3

    And not only that… It is also an active symmetrical mirror:

    352 >< 537 = 352 >< 235 (converting 7 into its ‘object’ configuration).

    Third interesting conclusion:

    Let’s leave the whole number 7 out and see what we have…

    (2973525376) let’s also take out 37 from the fraction.

    Recall that 37 was the result obtained by adding up:

    8 + 12 + 15 = 37! From the fractions not cancelled out in our Square Root analysis on top…

    So let’s see the number again without 37:

    (29735256) = (2 + 4 + 2 + 3 + 0 + 2 + 0 + 1) = 14 (5)! = -14 or 1/14!

    What is 1/14? Let’s see it…

    1/14 = 0.0 714 285! Our “lucky trio” once again!

    Physically the same response, right? Alpha representing a hidden symmetry and a “lucky trio” meaning a ‘perturbation’ within Reality. The same perturbation causing atomic orbitals to become elliptical and ‘electrons’ to become “trapped” inside a Quantum of Reality not yet ‘ready to show up’ in other words, an end of a cycle outside out time in an octave incongruent with the cycle of our dimensional Reality.

    Does it make sense to you or it is too heavy? I find trouble trying to express with simple words my vision of Reality sometimes for what I must ask for your understanding.
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

  8. #8
    4th degree Black Belt humanbydefault is on a distinguished road
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    450
    Blog Entries
    79
    Thanks Given
    2
    Thanked 34x in 30 Posts
    Rep Power
    23

    Re: "PHYSIMATICS" (Speaking the Language of Numbers)

    “Speaking the language of numbers”


    I was looking after the origins of Alpha (137) and I found this:

    73 + 64 = 137

    Where 73 = (7 + 3 ) = 10!

    Where 64 = (6 + 4) = 10!

    The 73rd Prime number is 367. (3 + 6 + 7) = 16!

    The 64th Prime number is 311. (3 + 1 + 1) = 5!

    16 + 5 = 21!

    Then the following pair of numbers adding up 137:

    82 + 55 = 137

    Where 82 = (8 + 2) = 10!

    Where 55 = (5 + 5) = 10!


    The 82nd Prime number is 421! (4 + 2 + 1) = 7!

    The 55th Prime number is 257!

    [(2 + 5) + 7]

    [7 + 7] = 14!

    Adding both: 7 + 14 = 21!

    Now… The 21st Prime number is 73!

    Where 73 = (7 + 3) = 10!

    Where 7 x 3 = 21!

    Who said that numbers can’t speak their minds?


    MIGUEL DE ZAYAS_AUTHOR OF "PHYSIMATICS"
    "Before God we are all equality wise - and equally foolish" (Albert Einstein)

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts