Quote:
Originally Posted by angledangle228 My comment would be this, whats is wrong with using QM for the very small and Relitivity for the very large... I mean, thats every thing. Right? large: check, small: check, everything. |
In fact that is what Science does ... it uses both.
Newton determined the Laws of Gravity.
Einstein, working on the electromagnetic force realised that Newtons concept was inaccurate. (I am only speaking very generally here) He corrected it.
If we only accept Newtons Laws, then all the modern day world would not have evolved to the current levels of technology. In other words we would have reached a limit.
As well there were many puzzling things that could not be explained by Newtons Laws.
Something was wrong.
Einstein spent the rest of his life trying to re-concile Gravity with the Electromagnetic force, to no avail.
In fact two new forces, previously unknown were discovered. These forces are explained by Quantum Mechanics. Whats more, they are more related to the Electromagnetic force than Gravity is.
If we use QM and Relativity as you suggest, once again we face a limit, beyond which we cannot go. Once again there are puzzling things that do not fit the known Laws.
Something is wrong.
To re-concile all four forces is the next goal. This is the purpose of a TOE or GUT.
The two books you first mentioned in another thread, are good 'starters' that will bring you to this understanding. Brian Greene's is probably the best for this.
You don't need to accept his 'view',
that is a personal thing, but if you follow his explanations then you will be able to form your own 'view'. Its important to be able to read and not be influenced by the authors personal view, unless you choose to. Use your own analogies and imagination if the authors analogies seem confusing.
A great way to do this is by asking others on this forum.
I suppose what I am really saying, is read a lot, but keep an open mind
cool bananas ... greg