As nothing is nothing it can't have property or existence. The proble is that by saying the word ntohing we are making it some-thing or at least a-thing and then nothing is not nothing but something which then by inverse all somethings would be nothings, then as I am something, I'm notihng. But that has no sense. It's the error of dealing with nothing. Therefore, we cannot say nothing exists, or say there can be anti-nothing. Becuase that woudl imppyl a king od "charge" in nothing, so it would have a property, so it would be something. And anyway, shouldn't the anti-nothing simply be everything?Originally Posted by michellemfry


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote



