Where are the other universes?

[surya]

For dimensions to connect
you need a connecting medium? i would suggest that this would be a
singularity!Via a very rapid spinning vortex!
kind regards michael.

i said for existence of different universe they should not be connected dimensionally. if they are connected by any medium like singularity then they will the part of our universe only.

[Duane Ertle]

There are two reasons why I would state this is correct, beyond the obvious fact that these waves are perfroming work all the time - as in holding us to earth, hydroelectric power, people falling down and not up etc.

One book that people like to use as a source of information is, "A Brief History of Time". On page 93, the last paragraph, it is stated that when gravitational waves leave an object they take energy away from that object.

I've used a horizontal beam to detect the formation and collapse of a gravitational field. Check it out on Http://timebones.blogspot.com

You gotta believe.

Duane

[mkirkpatrick]

What you have said, concerning there being a great difference between a hypothetical universe existing within our own that we are unaware of, appears true to myself also. We would not know the difference, though, unless we had access to them both, and could compare them.

As it is at present, it is physically impossible for mankind to leave either this time or universe. We are all composed of exactly the same time values, and whatever we would use to change those values, would have the same value. It would be like us using ice as tools when building a house of ice, and expecting the end result of our work to be something other than that of ice itself.

Science fiction offers no bounds to the possibility of what may happen, and what mankind might accomplish. There is a limit as to what ultimate reality is to mankind - e=mc2, m=e/c2, and c2=e/m.

I wish you the best.

Respectfully,
D. Ertle

Do you think that,say,an anti-matter universe,could somehow impinge on this one,say via,a singularity?just a thought.
kind regards michael.

[robynnee]

I do not ascribe to any one hypothesis about where the "other" universes may be. Some or none might be rolled up in the one we know. I do not think that they are parallel, however. Some may be next to ours if the "bubble" on the brane hypothesis is born out. Others could be spaced along the brane and be so far from us that we would never be able to prove they are there. Also, it could be likewise the case that the "bubble" we are on is a singular event. I think the highly unlikely, though.
I do think that there are other universes, however I think there needs to be much more data collected, and much more thinking done before any definitive answer to this puzzle can begin to emerge. The "belief" in the multiverse hypothesis smacks too much of "religion' for my liking and thus I must keep my thinking on the subject open to be compatible with scientific thinking.
(I vehemently dislike those little similes and iconic thingies)

[volantis]

There are already two known physical Universes, that of normal matter and that of antimatter. Due to the half spin nature of subatomic particles, both of these types of Universes occur in the forward direction of time. According to the Aether Physics Model (described on this site's research section) there are also matter and antimatter existing in the backward time direction. Thus there are four and exactly four different Universes.

Since the photon is exactly the same for matter and antimatter, it could very well be that many of the galaxies we see in deep space are actually made from antimatter.

One could make the argument that since we can see antimatter, then it must exist in our own Universe, and therefore there is only one Universe. But we have to draw a line somewhere as to what constitutes a boundary between our Universe and another Universe. I draw this boundary according to the structure of the subatomic particles, which make up the matter in each Universe. Subatomic particles with left spin, forward time direction (our "normal" matter) constitutes a Universe. Subatomic particles with right hand spin, forward time direction (antimatter) constitutes a different Universe. The two Universes can share the same space-time fabric (Aether), but the two different types of matter cannot coexist together. According to the APM, matter and antimatter are gravitationally repulsive, so an antimatter galaxy will usually steer clear of a normal matter galaxy.

The first question we must answer before asking if there are multiple Universes, is what defines a Universe?

[Infinite Consciousness]

The other universes are superimposed on ours at different frequencies of vibration. We are in them but are not aware of it because our awareness is totally tuned in to the frequencies of thought as the matter of the physical-material universe.

The physical-material universe is the electro-magnetic energy of thought at the frequencies of matter. We cannot think outside the box because the box is made of our thought as matter. In order to think outside the box you have to withdraw your awareness from the outer world to the inside spiritual worlds and tune your awareness to the higher frequencies there.

When you tune in to the higher frequencies you will experience your spirit self in all the other universes which you already exist in. Your Infinite Conscious self or "spirit" is already in all creation but your awareness as the content of your consciousness is only tuned in to the material frequencies of physical matter and that is the only reality you know.

If we don't listen and won't try it for ourselves how will we ever get out of the box (thought as the matter of the physical -material universe) that we ourselves are creating and imprisoning our selves in ? ? ?

[brianm_2u]

It is my firm belief that there are indeed other universes as well as theories of their location. I tend to think out of the box so my theories my not be well received, but here it goes anyway.

We are not aware of them because we are not in their dimension. When I use the word " dimension", I am referring to a scenario akin to a television receiver. We are one Chanel and for the most part unaware of other Chanel's that exist. Our brains, underutilized as they may be, have a long way to climb to the higher rungs of the ladder of awareness.

Brian

[MJA]

Backed up and based on simplicity, there are infinite and equal universes as there are infinite points of equal perception. When one sees difference, one has found the flaw that hold the universe apart. When one has finds equality, one know the truth and unity of all.

MJA

[RascalPuff]

The universe is spiral shaped and constructed with chambers such as those of Nautilus Pompelius Linnae

[Fluent Piffle]

Backed up and based on simplicity, there are infinite and equal universes as there are infinite points of equal perception. When one sees difference, one has found the flaw that hold the universe apart. When one has finds equality, one know the truth and unity of all.

MJA

Makes perfect sense to me, MJA! Each wave-centre is the centre of its sense-able (observable) 'universe'. Space, being infinite, would then amount to infinitely changing 'points' of existence. Effectively, we would observe all things as being 'in motion', which of course we do.


pif.