When will the Theory of Everything be Solved?

[Mikal]

Hi Steve…thought I would get back to you on this.

It seems that Professor Chang is like a rogue scientist who has left conventional science and joined forces with Dr. Michael Salla and others, formulating Exo-politics.

Dr. Salla is an expert in political science, foreign International Relationships and Political World Crisis. He has published some books I may try to secure so I can analyze his claims but I’ll have to find them first. Salla is under a lot of criticism because he has a connect to Ufology—but I can tolerate that connection because I studied for a year with a really excellent Ufologist so I do have a sense that something is not exactly right with thousands of people world-wide sharing the abduction experience. When I couple that with my own experiences I am not so ready to criticize him as I am to first study his work and listen to him.

Its evident they are working on the Genome System but I could not find anything valid as to just exactly what their study is. One gets a strong sense that they are maybe involved in a type of privatized Genome Study but as to securing actual evidence of lab studies I could not find anything valid to assure me of correctness.

One thing is interesting though. Their study has something to do with Psycho-kinetic energy—DNA and the Genome System. Really I do find that interesting and I read some really interesting scholarly studies on this that are on-line.

So I guess for now this is where it’s at!!

Regards Mikal

[SteveA]

That was nice of you to check further into the information. I must admit that when I read the article it appeared to contain too much sensationalism and speculation for me to take it very seriously, though the possibility is still interesting but I'd have no idea how, even if it was the case, that unless the entire structure of DNA was different than anything else on Earth, that just differences in genetics would be representative of something extraterrestrial, and this would seem even more the case for "junk DNA" as the information, as far as I know (which admittedly is not a lot) isn't very critical and can vary a lot due to its lesser influence on traits.

Then again, biology, organic chemistry and genetics aren't my fortes. That's partly the reason I was curious to know if there was some difference in the structure of the DNA beyond genetic differences.

I didn't mean to cause you a lot of work, though I'm certain you were curious yourself and I do appreciate you letting me know what you found (your comments appear to mirror what I had assumed - of course, it's not that these genes could not have extraterrestrial origins. In fact who knows if even most life on Earth arose from elsewhere, but I doubt there'd be much way to differentiate between mutations and extra-terrestrial sources, especially not in "junk DNA", without some examples of what to look for, unless the DNA structure was entirely different - though even then it would seem tough to say it's specifically extra-terrestrial).

Here's something to consider with the direction things appear to be headed with gene modification and cloning etc. We might find the closest thing to alien life right here on Earth. (Ok, sorry for the sensationalism, but it's something else that doesn't appear impossible)

[Mikal]

At this point I have followed so many studies into DNA, I am no longer calling it “Junk DNA” but am now referring to it as Development DNA and I strongly suspect it has something to do with hyper-activity in our 4th dimension biological system and the
evolution of consciousness.

It is the DNA structure that has everyone fascinated by its inherent intelligence. As to DNA having extra-terrestrial characteristics I am privy to some private information but I am not at liberty to speak about that ongoing study. I assure you if I am given permission from this highly involved gentleman—I would most certainly share.


Regards Mikal

[SteveA]

At this point I have followed so many studies into DNA, I am no longer calling it “Junk DNA” but am now referring to it as Development DNA and I strongly suspect it has something to do with hyper-activity in our 4th dimension biological system and the
evolution of consciousness.

Thank you for the reminder. Yes, I agree that DNA likely has structures that correlate with higher dimensional forms and in some ways, "Junk DNA" could be the most misunderstood area of it as these would likely not appear very active in terms of 3-D spacial motions ... it's ironic to consider that the relative slowness and plasticity of organic chemistry could actually arise from much more complex correlations in higher dimensions ... quite an interesting thought. Thank you again, Mikal. That was actually something I'd been thinking about before but forgot ... well who knows. Yes, it's another interesting possibility.

It is the DNA structure that has everyone fascinated by its inherent intelligence. As to DNA having extra-terrestrial characteristics I am privy to some private information but I am not at liberty to speak about that ongoing study. I assure you if I am given permission from this highly involved gentleman—I would most certainly share.

Regards Mikal

That's entirely fine. I enjoy trying to piece things together for myself as well ... I have a hard time digesting second hand information anyway, though those ideas still tend to float around for a while until they find a good spot to settle in

Best wishes in your explorations,
Steve

[KWAOUAR]

http://www.toequest.com/forum/blogs/...ml#comment1254

[jim barlow]

the geat story I think is always provisional besides being biased
according to who's "telling" it. We have the human bias. Even our
gods are simple projections of the human. Some even say the human
is the cemetery of the gods - and vice versa.
So we stay with the human point of view which is somewhat
like as if a pet cat attempted to put his little world together
and had been capable to make a construction in linguistics where everything
from its little world has a place in it and explain everything from the food dish
to the box. This is petty much all we can be talking about.
To me it is worth doing. It is evolutionary and scientific.

Among the imaginary aspects of the "big story" I would put this "holy"
characterisation. What that means though I can't imagine.

[PoPpAScience]

The "Theory of Everything" can only be from the perspective of a Philosopher. The "Theory of Effects" will be very hard for scientists to achieve because of the limits in experimentation, and a lack of "Free" contemplative thought.

The "Theory of Everything" will be in the hands and Minds of each generation of Philosophers, and they must attempt to reduce it to its "Simplest of Simplistic" Ideal. Then all we can hope is that those scientists of "Free Will" like Einstein, can contemplate and improve upon the "Theory of Effects" like "Relativity".

[MJA]

Hey, I have another identical twin!

=
MJA

[David Maes]

I think I found the TOE.

Snow White is here and a few of the dwarfs, Clumsy Hans, Sherlock Holmes, Peter Pan and Pippi Longstocking.
Little Red Riding Hood and Cinderella are here too.
Also Morten the goose, Goofy, Donald and his cousins, Daisy and uncle Scrooge, Chip and Dale.
Also present are Mickey Mouse and Gyro Gearloose, Adam and Eve, Noah, Alice and Winnie the Pooh.

[Spiral Path]

No, the TOE is not a fairy tale, as interesting as all the mentioned characters may be. It's a a solid physics theory - if the expert theoretical physicists were not so hung up on the quasi-religious concept of the Big Bang (BB) and give most of the available funding only to those researchers that agree with them. My universe is a universe of constant change (CC) and operates with a dynamical gravitational system. not the static Newtonian one as we generally presume it to be. Actually, if you read Newton's PRINCIPIA more carefully, you will find that he sensed these dynamics, but could not fully explore them with the primitive tools available during his time. Now, during the age of computers and space exploration, we can explore these dynamics and many researchers have done so. - The concept of the CC universe has been around for at least two and a half thousand years and its simple premise of the constantly changing interaction of everything within the universe can only be understood by open-minded scientists who are not afraid of paradigm shifts.
Spiral Path