Open Universe
Closed Universe
Flat Universe
Other (please comment)
http://www.therationalgod.com
You will understand the universe in sixty days or your money back. Guaranteed.
Similar to a door, if the universe is closed then it can be opened and if it is opened then it can be closed. We are living at the edge of the crack of dawn since what rises must sets and what sets must rises.Originally Posted by Hucknallite
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
It would seem that the universe just "IS" a concept in transit to a complete idea!
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Then it's neither opened nor closed?Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
The universe is absolutely incomprehensible as a whole but could be mathematically described by its parts or components. Science has now reached the point where and when the antimatter components must be found in order for the best of theories to make any sense.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
This question can be answered simply by flipping a fair unbiased coin.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
It slipped through the hole in my pocket into the bottomless pit.
Time independence: [∂E(g)]²=[∂F(a)×∂r(a)]·[∂F(b)×∂r(b)] and Mass independence: ¶a(t)·¶r(t)=c²
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)