Love

[melanie]

Austin, there is no Evolution without experience. How else would an entity improve upon itself.
I do not believe the Universe has feelings.
Feelings are a human experience.

Pure Love is this experience of Evolution. Humans experience this Love through the perspective of the human experience.
Thus the human experience of Love is flawed.

The universe expresses as all manifestation, AS it .. and through it,
it is emotionally responsive which extends to all carbon based compounds and organic structures including animal and plant life.

As each part interacts with other parts, chemicals mingle, feelings arise, with compassion for itself, as everything is interconnected.

It's all beating and vibrating as one heart...at the micro and macro level simultaneously.

Although this is only experienced through the human sensory emotional centers via human perception.(as far as we know)

Just sharing my personal intuitive ideas, that come through to me...

[Mikal]

Austin, there is no Evolution without experience. How else would an entity improve upon itself. I do not believe the Universe has feelings. Feelings are a human experience.

Pure Love is this experience of Evolution. Humans experience this Love through the perspective of the human experience. Thus the human experience of Love is flawed.

Hi Pop...how true your generalizations are!! Based on my own life I would add to it that evolution is to experience a connect with the spiritual which is why it is marked by the experience of pure love. I agree that the Universe would probably not have feelings but I do believe the Universe has awareness...


Mikal

[austintorn@aol.com]

Austin, there is no Evolution without experience. How else would an entity improve upon itself. I do not believe the Universe has feelings. Feelings are a human experience.


Poppa, Is the "entity" the Universe that has universal [not human] experiences that are [not] felt? (Should we say that "feelings" are emotions and that's why the Universe doesn't have any?)

I love how people speak for other humans, which sometimes works in a general way, but I am baffled by those who speak for Universes or "entities" or "Gods". How could someone possibly speak for them? Isn't this really some made up stuff which then is spoken for out of vanity?

[Mikal]

Austie...there is no vanity in the spiritual, there is humility and humbleness. There is the vanity of self-importance and power in religion which is why the world is a mess! Feelings are not emotions, emotions are of a higher nature. The Universe is mental in nature and scientists already are realizing that, so the Universe is capable of awareness, which is why when a sentient state is achieved higher dimensional spiritual beings can approach us and do....


Mikal

[Mikal]

Love bears all pain to a fruitful search to find hope. Love bears itself through all complications until it reaches understanding. Love bears itself through all clashes until it reaches tolerance. Love bears within it a million apologies for within the words "I am sorry" lie the wisdom of being small in the face of being borne to the humbling of your own humility. If you have not found these things...you know not LOVE.....


Peace and Love Mikal

[PoPpAScience]

Austin;

I am talking about the "entity", our Universe, and the "Action" of "Love", that is the experience of Evolution. I am not talking about the imperfect impression, and use of that which is at the core of our Universe by human Beings. There would be no expression of Love in humans, if there was not an "Action" of "Love" at the core of this Universe.

Remember I am talking about an "Action", not thoughts. Thoughts are what create "feelings". I personal do not ignore aspects of this Universe, just because humans manifest them in imperfect ways.

[melanie]

Love is like Motion. Motion is defined by bounded substance moving past another bounded substance. Motion is not a physical entity, but an Action.

Love is the same, it is an non-entity, an Action. It is the Action of experiencing Evolution by our Universe.

I do not see Love as something that is added to the Universe. I see it as something that is, because of an Evolving Universe.

There is no thinking involved by the Universe when it comes to Love, only Action.

Because Love is distinct, no analogy can be used. But, the Action of Love can be felt by the inner Being.

Absolute Perfect Clarity.

[melanie]

Pure Love is this experience of Evolution.

Humans experience this Love through the perspective of the human experience.

Thus the human experience of Love is flawed

Love.

[austintorn@aol.com]

The Universe is mental in nature and scientists already are realizing that

How is this? How are atoms mental?

Also, are not emotions molecular events? (Google neurotransmitter).

[austintorn@aol.com]

the "Action" of "Love", that is the experience of Evolution.

Poppa, I do not comprehend (A), action of love, nor (B), the experience of evolution, nor why A=B. What are the exact definitions of the terms as specifically used here?

Who or what gives the love? Is this the same as the action? Who or what experiences? and how?