Maybe it could be called a knowingness! Whatdo you say!Originally Posted by <<>>
kindregards michael.
Maybe it could be called a knowingness! Whatdo you say!Originally Posted by <<>>
kindregards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
Michael,Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
I am not sure I agree with you. Don't we all know (or believe) we are intelligent? Maybe an ape is intelligent? I once speculated that trees were the ultimate incarnation of us, as motion has not really advanced us as beings and as most (eastern) spiritual beliefs counsel silent meditation, which is all trees do...I no longer believe that intelligence contains knowledge. Knowledge, including knowledge of self and of truth and reality, is dependent on so much more than simply intelligence, don't you think?
The first is only interesting if it is the beginning of something. The first is not interesting if it is the only - Djanet Sears
I agree. Computers, for example, cannot be consciouss nor can they understand. That is why I say they can't have knowingness. Even though they can accumulate information and 'learn' and etz.Originally Posted by mkirkpatrick
You have made an excellent pointOriginally Posted by harmonygirl
H.G. and I tend to agree,there is a difference.
kindest regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
As long as we are resurrecting this thread, I would like to return to AntonioLao's quote from Confucius.
The universe is. It exists for all of us, or you are alone and it exists in your mind. It's existence it systematic - processes repeat, objects last from year to year or moment to moment.
Before "He who knows and knows he knows, his is wise, follow him", there is the foundation that "something can be known". In other words, there is a universe. There is something knowable. This is, literally, the universal set - the set of all things that can be known.
IMO, rather than follow anyone, it would be even better to understand the universe, first and foremost. The universe is, the universe is systematic, the wisdom of the universe is embodied by laws governing these systematic processes, and we must follow the universe because it's laws are omnipotent and omnipresent. Since knowledge exists within the universe and survives because of the laws of the universe, the universe can be said to be ominscient, too.
The scientific method is based upon laws of logic (philosophy) which assist us in gleaning knowledge about universal laws.
What is knowledge???
Knowledge can be nothing other than reflections of the universe in which we exist.
Emotive Energy - JAK's Theory of Brain, Mind, & Emotion:
http://www.theoryofmind.org/
The Origin of Minds - Peggy LaCerra & Roger Bingham
http://www.atonewiththeuniverse.org/
Behavioral Investment Theory - Gregg's Theory of Brain, Mind, & Emotion:
http://psychweb.cisat.jmu.edu/ToKSys...iles/frame.htm
Being able to reflect,to know that you know,that is have a consciousness that knowledge
exists,and then to use this understanding in the most positive way.
regards michael.
Humilty,coupled with boldness,surprises truth to
reveal herself?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)