When moderators modify or remove posts, as they did upon my complaints recently, and may do more of, it is because they deem it as noncondusive to the flow. This could as simple as it being off topic or as intense as it being an insult. They makka da rules, not us.
Being nonreactive, I first draw attention to straying onto the person instead of the idea in case it wasn’t meant as such or to find if it was, then see if one wishes to work it out or not. When those fail, plus further failures of sociability and humor, and I observe several more insults and characterizations following and continuing, then I finally report the post(s), even a whole series if more than just one or several.
This happened a lot more in the olden days, involving at least 14 separate posters and situations, as there were more posters then who labeled anyone with contrary opinion to their topic as 'evil'. Robert pretty much put a stop to this, as well as discussing politics, preaching religion, and the posting of pornographic images (plus more going against the guidelines).
See the 'Norm' thread for a fuller exposition (by some soldiers talking) of the lengths gone to to defend a 'concept of good'. In the extreme, such as in national politics or religion, full scale wars are begotten between the two sides of a 'debate' of so-called sure-thing 'concepts of good' which are usually but arbitrary [flawed] ideologies, many even merely 'made up'. This insight was a product of the 'Root of Evil' thread.


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
